
The authorities once again make us respect ourselves. And again in the usual way - having issued a corresponding resolution . Well, it is not the standard of living in the country to increase the sake of respect for the population, by golly.
To plant respect by decrees is like prohibiting the rain. You can, of course, walk on slush and pretend that rays blinded, but the snot and wet legs from this will not cease to be snot and wet legs.
The adoption of amendments was very excited. For more than 15 years I have been engaged in political journalism, so my Facebook page is a continuous disrespect for power. Therefore, I have several questions of practical property to this law.
The punishment is especially worried - from 30 to 100 thousand rubles for the first disrespect. From one hundred thousand to two hundred thousand rubles per repeated. Or administrative arrest for 15 days. More than two - from 200 thousand to 300 thousand rubles. Or 15 days.
Another incomprehensible moment is what is an indecent form. If I call the governor a corrupt official - is this a decent form? And a vile corrupt official?
Of course, I would prefer arrest. Firstly, there is no money for fines: my salary of the editor does not even do not even up to the officially declared average in the region. Secondly, I have two adolescents at home and periodically want to hide, and on vacation-look at the first point.
At first glance, everything is not so scary with this decree. Here it is, read for yourself:
Distribution in information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet, which expresses in an indecent form, which offends human dignity and social morality, a clear disrespect for society, the state, the official state symbols of the Russian Federation, the Constitution of the Russian Federation or bodies exercising state power in the Russian Federation, with the exception of cases provided for in Article 20.31 of this Code, if these actions do not contain these actions do not contain these actions A criminal act entails the imposition of an administrative fine of thirty thousand to one hundred thousand rubles ...
The wording, of course, is gorgeous: "Distribution ... of information expressing in an indecent form that offends ... a clear disrespect for society." Do not dare to "insult a clear disrespect", otherwise a fine.
Philologists are already mocking. Dmitry Gudkov thinks how to cancel the law.
This disgrace does not surprise me at all. In the Sakhalin Regional Duma, several convocations were the head of the local branch of the LDPR, who, according to the official biography, defended the candidate dissertation on sociology and doctoral in economics. Corresponding Member of the International Academy of Sciences of Information, Information Processes and Technologies, Academician of the International Academy of Informatization. The author of several books. A man made a rapid transition from a shaven-headed character from the 90s to an academician.
The deputy tried very hard to support the image of the professor, at the meetings he tried to quote Churchill. True, for some reason the Whitney called him. Colleagues did not correct him. So he probably did not find out that Whitney Houston and Winston Churchill are two different people.
It is very difficult to respect the power of non-teaching, which even write a google translite as a law on respect for themselves.
Another incomprehensible moment: what is an indecent form. If I call the governor a corrupt official - is this a decent form? And a shameless corrupt official? And vile?
If I will put me for these words for 15 days, I will sit out, and then they will put the governor for corruption already? Will I rely on compensation? A very likely option in the present time. Former Sakhalin Governor Alexander Khoroshavin has already received 13.6 years and now he was again in the dock of the defendants already on new charges.
Here's another question: in the city Duma of Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, according to the Investigative Committee, 18 out of 24 deputies bought their places for bribes in the amount of 5 to 15 million rubles. I can not respect such power? And if I will add something obscene to the situation on my FB page to these deputies?
In fact, the decision is useless. Respect is a mutual thing. It involves justice, equality of rights, attention to the interest of another person, his beliefs.
If the authorities say : “The state did not ask you to give birth,” “Helpers and parasites receive a pension of 8 thousand,” if the government tells how beautifully you can live on a living wage and on the "pasta", it does not dare to demand respect from me.
In my work there was a lot of interviews, unpleasant to the interlocutor, but only once the conversation was interrupted by tantrums. The Minister of Sports, Tourism and Youth Policy, who later grew up to the deputy chairman of the Sakhalin government, Anton Zaitsev, with whose sending on Sakhalin 100 million rubles were just allocated to create a center of technical sports, was determined to speak with slogans, and I molested with boring - where exactly the money would go, how many children would be engaged in when.
The minister began to run around the office and scream at the press secretary, why the issues were not agreed in advance, accused that I was trying to denigrate an excellent business. I did not have time to get to work, and the seizure from the ministry forced to collect an urgent meeting of editors under the chairmanship of the director of the media holding. It’s good that the interview was written in the video.
Yes, let them come out at least a hundred corrections, I will not respect an official who does not respect my journalist’s right to ask any questions, does not respect taxpayers who have the right to know what their money is going on.
And guys, do you seriously think that with amendments to the law will shut up our mouths?
If a person is a fool, corruption, non -teaching, hysteria, we are sure that we will find the opportunity to tell him this.
Lyubov Barabashova - journalist, Sakhalin
The "Opinion" expressed in the heading of the point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial office