On April 4, 2019, Olga Skabeeva invited Poroshenko and Zelensky to hold their debate. “Petro Oleksiyovich and Volodimir Oleksandrovich, I responsibly declare that I, Olga Skabeeva, am ready to conduct your pre-election sparring,” an employee of the main state television channel Rossiya-1 said in her blog and assured that she guarantees objectivity and impartiality, and the fee for the conducted The debate undertakes to be transferred to the International Monetary Fund "to pay off the external debt of Ukraine."
Skabeeva and her colleagues liked this trolling so much that a 4-minute story was dedicated to him in the Vesti program on the Russia-24 channel and a rather large fragment in Andrei Malakhov's program on the Russia-1 channel. “Who, if not me,” Skabeeva grimaced and promised to learn to speak Ukrainian in two weeks ...
Through the mockery and ridicule of the inhabitants of Russian television, one can clearly see the envy of the Ukrainians, who have real elections with competition, intrigue and unpredictable results. That is, with everything that is called political life. Unlike the cemetery into which Russian politics has become over the 20 years of Putinism. Suffice it to recall last year's special operation, when Skabeeva's senior colleague Vladimir Solovyov, without hiding his disgust and contempt, led what they called "debates" on the Russia-1 channel.
Today, the presidential elections in Ukraine are the main topic of Russian television. Impotents and old maids lustfully peep through the crack at how others live life to the fullest. Television critics, that is, those who “watch the observers,” are arguing about who the Russian television is campaigning for, trying to conclude on this basis which of the two applicants who made it to the second round is the Kremlin’s candidate.
Most often, Vladimir Zelensky is called in this capacity. Indeed, in the Russian media, only bad and very bad things are said about Petro Poroshenko, there are much fewer nasty things about Zelensky, more often they are neutral, and sometimes they just praise him. Here is a summary of one of the videos on the YouTube channel, created by the creative duet of actors Porechenkov and Okhlobystin:
Porechenkov: Well, if he wins...
Okhlobystin: We owe him.
Glory to Ukraine!
Crimea is ours!
Everything is ours!
Both in chorus: For Zelensky!!!
In social networks, this video walks, accompanied by comments: “Crimeanists Porechenkov and Okhlobystin are campaigning for Zelensky. Ukrainians, think for whom to vote!”.
The version about the clinical idiocy of the organizers of the information war against Ukraine seems to be insufficiently substantiated. This campaign "in support" of Zelensky, which involves open enemies of Ukraine, is more like a game to lower his rating
Those who believe that this product is campaigning for Zelensky, apparently, have such a picture. Meeting with First Deputy Head of the Russian Presidential Administration Alexei Gromov. All heads of federal TV channels and other information services are present. The question on the agenda is how to push Zelensky to the presidency of Ukraine. And then it dawns on someone, maybe Dobrodeev or Ernst: let's order a campaign video for Zelensky Porechenkova, who became famous for scribbling from a machine gun in the direction of Ukraine and the citizen of the DPR Okhlobystin. Both in Ukraine have long been on the "black lists". And then Aleksey Alekseevich Gromov joyfully slaps the author of the idea on the shoulder and shouts: “It’s great!” He orders to urgently pay for the order.
The version about the clinical idiocy of the organizers of the information war against Ukraine seems to be insufficiently substantiated. This campaign "in support" of Zelensky, which involves open enemies of Ukraine, is more like a game to lower his rating. Approximately with such goals and in such logic, a fake action “Gays for Yavlinsky” was organized on Russian TV. It was back in those days when the Kremlin was seriously afraid of Grigory Alekseevich and hit him with all the main guns ...
This time, of all the main guns, the Kremlin is hitting Zelensky. The most popular Saturday entertainment talk show by Andrey Malakhov "Hi, Andrey!" on Rossiya-1 on 04/06/2019 turned into a 2-hour campaign video for Zelensky. To campaign for the leader of the presidential race in Ukraine, Andrei Malakhov’s studio brought together those whom many in Ukraine, most likely the majority, consider indirectly guilty of the occupation of Crimea and the murder of 13,000 citizens of Ukraine.
All these people, most of whom are banned from entering Ukraine, talk about their friendly ties with Zelensky, praise him as an actor and person, and explain what a good president he will be for Ukraine
The following people praised Zelensky.
Oleksandr Khinshtein, State Duma deputy: “I am sure that for many Ukrainians voting for Zelensky is a victory for sanity.”
Alexander Yakovlev, Komsomolskaya Pravda employee: “Zelensky is an amazing politician!”
Sergei Lavrov, head of the Russian Foreign Ministry. He was not present at the studio, but Malakhov said that Lavrov "really appreciates Zelensky's work."
Otar Kushanashvili: “I would vote immediately!” (for Zelensky. - I.Ya.). “Poroshenko is a cynical clown! This is a multiplayer! Zelensky comes to power and calls his two corefans: Saakashvili and Kushanashvili. And the country fell apart! Prior to this, Kushanashvili, who even in the Russian TV community has a reputation as a scoundrel, tells how he worked with Zelensky for 5 years and lived at his house for six months ...
All these people, most of whom are banned from entering Ukraine, talk about their friendly ties with Zelensky, praise him as an actor and person, and explain what a good president he would be for Ukraine. Aleksey Gromov, Oleg Dobrodeev, Konstantin Ernst and all this information elite are, of course, not Spinoza. But not stupid either. Ukraine has just demonstrated the value of public support for Russia. Yuri Boyko received it in the form of communication with Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow on the eve of the first round. As a result - 11% of the votes. The upper limit of such support, according to sociologists, is about 15%. It is clear that electoral "arithmetic" is not reduced to simple addition and subtraction. But it is obvious that with 30 percent of Zelensky in the first round, public support for the side that has 11 percent and at the same time is perceived extremely negatively by everyone else is a game to lower the result of Zelensky.
The question remains, why would the Kremlin and its information services fuel the leader of the presidential race in Ukraine. To answer this question, you need to understand what the inhabitants of the Kremlin and Russian TV want from Ukraine. They want Ukraine to have – what? These goals have been repeatedly voiced on Russian TV programs by those who speak loudly what the Kremlin thinks. Kurginyans, Solovyovs and other Bagdasarovs constantly say that an explosion is about to happen in Ukraine, then there will be a big Chaos, and then a Split. As a result, there will be no Ukraine. Half will go to Russia, the rest will be divided by Poland and Hungary. How likely is such an option given such a crushing victory for Zelensky, which can happen if the result of the first round is proportionally reproduced in the second? That is, if there is something like 65:33 in favor of Zelensky? With such a consolidation of the nation, there is no need to talk about a split. A possible split is the victory of any candidate with a minimal advantage. Then you can arrange provocations, through your agents or with the help of "useful idiots" yell about fraud, play on the "non-recognition of the elections", and if possible, sprinkle the Ukrainian land with a lot of blood ... Even if it doesn't come out to chop off another piece of foreign territory, Ukraine it will be bad, which means, from the point of view of the inhabitants of the Kremlin and their TV, they should be fine. Because, apart from zero-sum games, they don’t know how to play anything else ...
Photo: news.rambler.ru