The father of the raped girl increasingly recalls the film "Voroshilovsky shooter." Five years have passed, accused - free

Lena was fifteen, when four of her peers were brutally abused her (at the request of her parents, all the names and surnames of family members were changed - ed.). It would not be difficult to investigate this serious crime - the suspects not only did not hide, they publicly boasted perfect. Frank photos and videos of their “exploits” were posted on social networks, publicly advised the girl to use contraceptives just in case. The screenshots of these materials were brought to investigators of the Scholkovo city by the victim's parents. The investigation nevertheless took three years, from August 2013 to August 2016.

Actually, they, as a rule, are immediately detained in the commission of such crimes and only then carry out investigative actions. In this case, they did not take anyone under arrest.

At the end of 2016, the Schelkovo City Court began to be considered, the trial went until June 2017. Bottom line: despite the fact that the prosecutor asked three defendants for 7 and one 6 years in prison, the court sentenced everyone to conditional punishment.

On July 3, 2018, the Moscow Regional Court abolished the sentence against three young accused and sent the case for a new consideration to the same Schelkovo court (the sentence was left unchanged with respect to the fourth accused).

The new judicial consideration began in September 2018, and 19 of the appointed twenty -five court hearings did not take place ... The court, in fact, does not go. The reasons are different: one of the defendants has a session and he is preparing for the exam, the other has a lawyer, then another defender went on vacation - and so on.

The sixth year has been going on since the crime. Lena’s father increasingly recalls the film “Voroshilovsky shooter”, where grandfather performed by actor Mikhail Ulyanov buys a gun and shoots “major” - rapists of his granddaughter. Lena's father says:

“You can’t even imagine what I would do to them when everything happened! But he overpowered himself, told himself that the lynching was not a way out, the law and justice on our side. In the end, we have been living in hell for five and a half years. We see neither the law nor justice. ”

Minus orgy

Life is sometimes more monstrous than even terrible film. In the "Voroshilovsky arrow" the girl was lured into the apartment of unfamiliar guys. The girl from life went to meet with friends, whom she met on vacation in the Turkish recreation camp “Long Beach”. Returning from Turkey, the guys got a chat with the name of the same name, shared the news, did not want to part. One of them, E., in the correspondence suggested gathering at his house in Shchelkovo - a free apartment, no one will be at home at night.

“ This happened on August 10, 2013,” says the girl’s mother. - Lena told me that today a meeting with the guys from the camp. In this camp, she rested for two summer in a row, and always everything was fine. I allowed. At about 9 pm, Lena called with a request to allow her to stay with the company for the night. She said that everyone remains, go far - they are in Shchelkovo. I did not even understand that we were talking about the city of Shchelkovo, I thought that in the area of ​​the Shchelkovskaya metro station. But she said: "Call me back in 10 minutes." She began to consult with her daughter Olya, the older sister of Lena, between the girls was a very trusting relationship.

“Olya convinced: we need to allow - we all went together, and they will come together, it’s scary to go to the girl in the evening in the evening. And I allowed her with the condition that SMS and photo were sent. ”

In the materials of the criminal case, 24 volumes. Witnesses, and the accused also practically tell the same thing, only in different words: they arrived by train in Schelkovo in the evening, waited for E., who invited everyone. When he came, we went to the store, bought chips, several bottles of vodka and wine. Everyone was 15-16 years old, E. - 14, but they sold it. The apartment is two -room, at first sat at the table in the kitchen - 7 people, three girls and four guys. Lena drank a glass of vodka for a dispute and immediately, literally before her eyes, began to get drunk. She went into the room with difficulty and literally collapsed onto the bed. One left or someone spent-here the testimonies vary. Some claim that she lost consciousness, others - that she fell asleep so that it was impossible to wake up.

Around the girl, who was in a helpless state, a disgusting orgy unfolded. At first, the guys were still hiding: at the closed door of the room, someone stood “on a stirrup”, then, when someone left there, he was replaced by the “duty officer”. Then someone had already begun to boast before the company what he did with helpless Lena. The girls also entered the room several times, saw it undressed, on the floor lay an open pack of condoms. They dressed, tried to wake up. It did not work. And so several times: they dressed, left, returned - Lena was undermined again. She did not wake up.

Somewhere at midnight, part of the company went out to meet a friend E., with whom no one but him is familiar. This friend, A., also, according to witnesses, several times went into the room with sleeping Lena and was there for quite some time. The same thing is said about the accused K., whom one of the girls saw in the shorts lying in the same shorts next to naked Lena, the other witnesses and the accused in their testimony say that they saw how he was on duty at the door. He dragged her several times in his arms into the bathroom, supposedly to bring her senses and wash off the drawings that someone painted on her body with a felt-tip pen.

The apogee of this wild meeting of “Friends” was the general gathering at the girl’s bed. E. called everyone and, as the witnesses recalled, everyone called “with such an intonation, as if something funny was happening or should happen. And everyone followed him. Lena was naked, lay on her stomach, coins were thrust into her. ” Almost all the witnesses, and the accused themselves say that such an idea belonged to K. together with him, this was done by the fourth accused - Ch., And he eventually turned out to be the only one who pleaded guilty.

Everyone was filmed on the phones and immediately laid it on the network. One of the witnesses later said to the investigator: "I felt disgusted, and I went out."

But none of the guys tried to stop the villain, which in the Criminal Code has the name: "Sexual violent acts regarding a minor." Only one of the girls cried out: "I will call the police now." But everything lasted at least twenty minutes. They dragged Lena into the bathroom, locked themselves with her, then returned to the room again, and again someone stood on the stirrup. The court said that "violent actions and rape were repeated in nature and lasted until the morning."

When Lena woke up, she remembered everything only until she drank vodka. She was told that they dragged her several times to the bathroom to wash. And the unsuspecting girl asked for forgiveness from "friends" for the chores delivered.

Security code

They began to tell the truth to Lena in the train. She did not understand for a long time that all this was seriously, could not believe, because they talked about howling, laughing, interrupting each other. Then they showed photos and videos that were broadcast on the network from 23 hours. Lena fell into a stupor. Silent.

“The husband was on a business trip, all evening and night I waited for SMS from Lena, called her many times - the phone did not answer,” Mom says. - The eldest daughter comforted: "These are teenagers, there is probably loud music, she does not hear calls." Lena answered only at 10 in the morning, said that she was going to Moscow, but at home she would be later, you need to stop by a friend. Later it turned out that she met with her friend, who gave her money for contraceptives, “friends” in the train urgently advised them to drink.

The girl appeared at home in the evening, slipped into her room. Mom and sisters answered all the questions of her stomach, and was poisoned. Lena categorically refused to call the doctor. She left the room as needed only if she believed that no one sees her. None of the households could tie a conversation: neither sister, nor mother, nor already returning father.

This went on ten days - ten days of complete self -isolation, pain, fear, shame, feelings - photos and videos were also watched on the network and strangers who climbed into her personal messages with dirty issues.

What should loved ones do if the girl told everything right away? Hug and repeat like a mantra many times in a row: “You are not to blame for anything. What happened to you is very difficult to survive, but you are not to blame for anything! Together we can handle it. ” It is like artificial respiration, it is necessary to say to the victims of violence - as psychologists say. Otherwise, a person can seriously suffer.

And Lena fell ill, she revealed a "mixed alarming, depressive disorder, anxious-phobic disorders." And in the conclusion of a forensic complex psychological and psychiatric examination, which was presented in court, it is said that this disease is regarded as severe harm caused by human health, and is located, quoted, “in a direct causal relationship with the offenses committed in relation to it, as well as the subsequent rally of the events of the offenses (discussion on social networks, correspondence with the accused, demonstration of demonstration. Photos) ".

Close learned about what happened on the tenth day, more precisely, on the tenth night. Olya's older sister saw her sister's unclosed tablet, she understood everything and ran to her parents. The very next morning, without hesitation, they went to the investigative organs with screenshots of photo and video materials and greasy correspondence. In the correspondence there was such a fragment. Lena asks: "Didn't I resist at all?" K.:

“You were a vegetable ... you were fucked specifically ... to a gynecologist and pregnancy tests. And contraceptive ... postinor is called, gun. ”

To the question: “Why do I advise me to do a pregnancy test? Are they ...? " - one of the witnesses answers: "A friend of E. was with condoms, but E. - xs ( unknown. - Approx. Ed. )."

- E. was the only one of the company who traveled to the Turkish camp just like Lena for two years in a row. That is, he knew her the longest, ”says mother. - And he was the first to rape. When the examinations have already begun, it turned out that he had the same infectious disease that appeared after that night and Lena. Shortly before that terrible night, she underwent a complete medical audit, she did not have such a disease.

Parents in the police department said that a criminal case could be instituted only at the place where the crime was committed. We went to the Schelkovo division of the IC of the Russian Federation. The case was opened. The investigator by the name of the Drumber conducted an inspection of the crime scene, but did not even seize the mattress on which the rape took place. Although at his disposal there was already a correspondence from the social network, in which

The next morning after the crime, E. writes: "I can’t wash the mattress."

“For three years, the investigation actually saboted the investigation,” says Alexander Koshkin, lawyer of the fund for supporting crimes, who appealed to the editorial office with this infinite history. - Think about the mattress - the main thing - was seized only a year after what happened! The investigation was not ensured by timely seizure and research and other evidence, which allowed the accused to get rid of them, including echoing correspondence on social networks (it was preserved with witnesses), get rid of phones and other devices that all this action were removed, to “discuss” their testimonies with witnesses and ask them not to tell the truth about the events of that night. Since the defendants were not detained, they took only a recognizance not to leave them from them, they got the opportunity to influence witnesses and get rid of evidence.

- In November 2013, the new investigator Kravtsov began to business. He endlessly demanded that we bring Lena to him, ”says the girl’s father. - And she was already unbearable to tell in the second round, and we explained this.

“And then the investigator took and sent a letter to the school: we need a repeated characteristic of Lena in the rape case. And the whole school found out about it. ”

- ( continues ) The characteristic in the case already had, for which he needed the second - there is no answer to this question. We began to complain about the investigator, the prosecutor’s office recognized our complaint justified, in December he was selected and transferred to the regional investigator Kutsenko. And we believed that now everything would go differently. But…

“But in the end I had to complain about him,” Lena’s mother picks up the conversation. - It is a pity, we later realized that we needed to write down all the conversations with them on the recorder. Kutsenko told me approximately the following: “I understand everything, but I have to agree with the accused. Otherwise, you know, your daughter can turn from the victim into the accused. You must come with your daughter today. And you don't need a lawyer. ” That is, here is a direct threat. He was removed from the case too, a new one was appointed: the investigator for especially important cases of the Main Directorate of the UK in the Moscow region of Strekach. As it became known, on February 14, 2014, he began to demand from one of the witnesses so that she urgently convinces Lena to come to him without parents and a lawyer - to pick up a statement, because in the case, they say, there is no evidence. And as if he added that Lena does not believe: "She is spinning, like in a frying pan." When the witness came to our house and handed these words, Lena burst into tears, jumped up and, flying a bullet, was on the balcony.

“There was an older sister in the apartment, who ran out for screams, and they mainly held the sobbing Lena. Then they were afraid to leave her alone, on duty both day and night. ”

-Later it turned out that the protocol of interrogation of the girl-seeker disappeared from the case along with the protocol of interrogation of another important witness. The very first and, probably closest to reality, the accused, ”says lawyer Alexander Koshkin, also disappeared. - In the materials of the criminal case there were only links to these documents. A few months later, when the case was already listened to in court, in relation to investigators who conducted the investigation, as well as their leaders, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation opened a criminal case under part 1. Art. 293 of the Criminal Code ("negligence"). Almost all six sheets of the decision to initiate criminal proceedings are the transfer of violations of criminal procedure legislation. But, alas, the decision to institute criminal proceedings was later canceled by the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation. None of the investigators were even brought to disciplinary liability.

Lena’s parents had the impression that all investigators, and later the judge of the Shchelkovo city court, Olga Bibikov, treated the victim of the girl as the accused, and the accused as relatives who are in danger. The “soul” was especially strong for them for the accused K.-he was given punishment so creatively that they even turned a strong sports guy into a disabled person of the 2nd group. This subsequently, when checking, the disability was removed, which gives reason to assume - it was bought to avoid punishment.

The feeling is that the accused, if they are not only left for serious crimes, but also selflessly protect those who must prove guilt, know some kind of security code.

I tried to talk with the accused, called lawyer E. Natalya Kopnina. She refused to interview and the request to give the contacts of other lawyers the accused and their clients replied that the decision was made collegial: no interview would give any interview.

“We have no right to claim that the money was paid, but we can’t find any other explanation,” says Lena's mother. - They simply bought our first lawyer. K. family is quite wealthy, they have a business, a private house, the defendant comes to court in an expensive car. The lawyer who defended him in the First Court was a leader among everyone else.

“For what reason the investigation allowed many evidence of the prosecution to disappear, it is difficult to say corruption or disorder,” says Ekaterina Roy, lawyer of the victim. - Do the defendants have wealthy family? I can judge by the lawyers of the defendants, who are not that stars, but quite expensive and strong procedural opponents. At the court of first instance, they formed serious protection. My colleague and I did not participate there, there were other lawyers, and we started after the court’s sentence, wrote an appeal and now we are already participating in the new court. But we carefully understood the circumstances and see that a lot of work was done in the last court to combine the position of all lawyers of the defendants. If at first they were scattered, and each defendant gave testimonies that expose others, to the maximum gaining themselves, then subsequently everything changed.

«Чувствовалось, что был выработан общий план, по которому никто никого не изобличал, никто не виноват, и непонятно вообще, что происходило и происходило ли».

— ( продолжает ) Ну, и еще они пытались перенести акцент на моральный облик жертвы, заказали экспертизу ее переписки с друзьями, которую девочка вела еще до страшного события. И пришли к выводам, что якобы ее образ жизни вызывал критику. Но, во-первых, это абсолютно не так. А во-вторых, даже если бы так было, это никого не освобождает от ответственности. Но на суде прозвучало какое-то непонятное заключение некоего ООО «Бюро независимой экспертизы «Версия».

Психология — наука о душе, психологи-эксперты не могли не представлять, что происходит и что они делают. Тем более что представитель бюро «Версия» психолог Старостин выступал на одном из судебных заседаний.

Как профессионал мог себе позволить составить заключение о моральном облике несовершеннолетней жертвы изнасилования?

Не видя девочки, не зная ее, основываясь только на выдернутых из контекста отдельных фразах переписки в соцсети. Бюро заказали, оплатили — оно и выполнило. Именно что «оно».

« У тебя денег не хватит с нами судиться»

Первый суд проходил под смешки подсудимых и со скорой, увозившей папу жертвы с гипертоническим кризом и сердечным приступом. Судья Ольга Бибикова, по словам родителей Лены, демонстрировала враждебность потерпевшей стороне.

— Я однажды не выдержала, встала и спросила: «Почему вы так внимательно относитесь ко всем просьбам стороны обвиняемых и совсем не слышите нас? — рассказывает мама. — Судья скривилась и обратилась ко мне на «ты»: «Ты давай лучше дочь свою в суд приводи». Она все время этого требовала, несмотря на то что в суде уже выступила врач-психиатр Центра имени Сербского и сообщила, что в настоящее время состояние Лены не позволяет ей участвовать в суде, поскольку любое напоминание о случившемся может повлечь ухудшение ее здоровья. Судья тогда выкрикнула: «Ну, это не вы, а я буду решать, быть ей в суде или нет».

Приговор, который был вынесен судьей Ольгой Бибиковой, стоит процитировать, так как были факты, дать оценку которым она была просто вынуждена. Например, по поводу инфекции, которой страдал хозяин квартиры и которая позже была обнаружена у Лены. И по поводу свидетельских показаний одной из девочек, которая видела обвиняемого А. практически в момент изнасилования.

ФРАГМЕНТЫ ПРИГОВОРА

1) «Не может, безусловно, свидетельствовать о совершении обвиняемым 1 полового сношения с потерпевшей и наличия у них урогенитальной микроплазменной инфекции, поскольку не предоставляется возможным определить путь (а именно половым путем или нет) и давность заражения указанной инфекцией».

2) «Показания свидетеля обвинения также не могут достоверно свидетельствовать о совершении обвиняемым полового сношения с потерпевшей, поскольку из ее показаний (свидетеля), данных в судебном заседании, следует, что сама она не видела совершения полового акта обвиняемым 2 с потерпевшей, а лишь предположила, что обвиняемый 2 совершает половой акт, исходя из того, что, заглянув в комнату, увидела обвиняемого 2, находящегося сверху потерпевшей и совершающего поступательные движения».

Комментировать нечего, но важно сказать, что судья нашла еще и обстоятельство, смягчающее наказание: «возмещение одним из подсудимых причиненного вреда». Речь идет об А., который незадолго до приговора отправил потерпевшей 30 тысяч рублей. Лена не пошла их получать, и деньги, должно быть, благополучно вернулись отправителю.

Но посчитать 30 тысяч рублей за причинение тяжкого вреда здоровью смягчающим обстоятельством — это, конечно, почти то же самое, что и не считать свидетельством изнасилования «находящегося сверху потерпевшей и совершающего поступательные движения» обвиняемого.

Наказания за изнасилование не получил никто, всем четверым было предъявлено обвинение за насильственные действия сексуального характера, совершенные в отношении несовершеннолетней с причинением вреда здоровью. И даже по этой, тоже тяжелой, статье они получили невероятно мягкое наказание — 4 года условно.

В приговоре это объясняется так.

ФРАГМЕНТ ПРИГОВОРА

«Суд принимает во внимание, что с момента совершения преступления 11.08.2013 прошло уже более трех лет, в течение которых подсудимые проявили себя с положительной стороны, продолжили обучение, занятия спортом, положительно характеризуются, к административной и уголовной ответственности не привлекались, что свидетельствует о том, что подсудимые осознали содеянное, встали на путь исправления, в связи с чем суд приходит к убеждению, что их исправление возможно без реального отбывания наказания».

Но что могли они «осознать», если трое из обвиняемых так своей вины и не признали?

То есть бездействие следователей, затянувших на три года «расследование» преступления, дало возможность судье оставить всех на свободе, чтобы могли продолжить учебу?

Затравленная, уничтоженная ими девочка тоже нашла в себе силы поступить в престижный вуз, но учиться там не смогла — по состоянию здоровья.

— Лена недавно поступила в другой вуз, снова учится, но… Она не верит в правосудие. А мы верили, столько написали разных бумаг, добились апелляции. Знаете, когда мы только обратились в следственные органы, мне на мобильный телефон поступил анонимный звонок, мужской голос отчетливо произнес: «У тебя денег не хватит с нами судиться», — говорит отец. — И я теперь думаю, он прав был. Мы с женой уже не вывозим ситуацию — ни финансово, ни психологически. У нас на адвокатов ушло за пять с половиной лет около четырех миллионов рублей. Я, как все это случилось, забросил свой бизнес. Жена все чаще обращается за помощью к психиатрам.

«Знаете, как сейчас все происходит? Мы собираемся на судебное заседание, все подтверждено, нам говорят: приезжайте. Мы едем в этот ставший уже нам ненавистным город Щелково. А нам опять, например, говорят: знаете, адвокат одного из подсудимых еще не доехал, приходите к двум, заседание переносится».

— ( продолжает ) Мы приходим к двум, выясняется, что не доехавший адвокат вообще находится в другом городе. Заседание переносится. Суд как бы идет. Но он не идет. Правосудия мы не видим уже шестой год.

Согласно статистике, в России лишь 10–16 % жертв изнасилования обращаются в полицию. И очевидно — почему.