Little flying Chernobyl

About the accident of a "liquid reactive installation with an isotopic power source" and kleptocracy

On August 8, a rocket exploded at the Arkhangelsk training ground, near Arkhangelsk. After this explosion in Severodvinsk, a short -term surge of radiation was recorded. People died.

At first we were informed that the exploding rocket is an anti -ship's “Zircon”. On Zircon there is a scramble (hypersonic direct-flowing air-reactive engine). From the explosion of the scrumge of radiation, there are exactly the same as from the explosion of the steam boiler. It is difficult to imagine five Rosatom employees present at the tests of the ship.

The observed clinical picture corresponds to only one type of weapon, which the president spoke of in March 2018, namely, the SSC-X-9 complex, it is also the Bureurestnik missile with a direct-flow nuclear engine. And it was the satellite shooting of such a launch unit that the Americans published.

It seems that she exploded.

If this is so, then this means that the internal parts of the nuclear reactor - or, apparently, circulating the liquid in it - ended up on the outside or on the stand, as well as the insides of the Chernobyl reactor by the explosion were scattered throughout the station.

Finally, on Saturday, Rosatom said that the accident “occurred during the work related to engineering and technical support *of the isotopic power sources on the liquid motor installation” *. Interesting, I didn’t even lie Rosatom. The nuclear installation of the "Petrel" can be described that way.

What is a nuclear rocket? It is very simple, in theory. You have a nuclear reactor, through this nuclear reactor you drive the air, it heats up and throws out of the nozzle, the reactive jet is obtained - the rocket flies.

This concept was very popular in 1950. Among the Soviet military, but it did not reach production. Why? It is also very simple. If you pass the working body-that is, the air-through the active zone of the reactor (through the "isotopic power sources, in the terminology of the press release of the Rosatom), it is clear that

The air that flies out of the nozzle contains a giant amount of radioactive elements.

It is still difficult to say whether the rocket will fall on the adversary, but while it flies over the territory of its own country, it will like everything. This is such a flying Chernobyl.

Naturally, the next engineering idea is to isolate the active zone. It is then that the word "liquid" appears in the installation. Between the working body - air and the active zone, you put, very roughly speaking, a radiator in which the liquid that heats the air circulates. So you do it, I quote Rosatom’s press release, “liquid motor installation with isotopic power sources”. This is such a pseudonym for a flying nuclear reactor.

When Putin shows pictures to the Federal Assembly, this is a rocket with a nuclear engine. And when it exploded, this is a liquid installation with isotopic sources.

But the flying nuclear reactor, even if you isolate the active area from the working body with the “liquid medium”, remains a small flying Chernobyl.

Two questions arise: and if the rocket is flying in the wrong place? And if she explodes at the start? In any case, we will talk about a regular explosion, not nuclear. But at the same time, the wreckage, which will be scattered over a more or less large territory, will be fragments of a nuclear reactor.

Again. By making a rocket with a direct -flow nuclear engine - you make a planned Chernobyl. You have no other option. If you launched it, she will someday fall to the ground. In connection with the well -known law of Newton.

Theoretically, the rocket should hit the enemy or a conditional target at the training ground. And if it explodes at the start or deviates from the trajectory?

The USSR did not make a missile with a nuclear motor installation not because there were not enough brains, but because the concept of flying Chernobyl was too dangerous.

Moreover, almost all those computer shooters that were demonstrated by the Federal Assembly are exactly the same obviously unrealized concepts.

The Soviet military machine gave rise to many unsuccessful projects that could not be implemented due to its military meaninglessness. All these projects, however, were super -secret. The Kremlin takes out these dangerous projects from Naftalin and pretends them for the latest achievements of the Russian military kleptocracy.

Of course, we still cannot say with one hundred percent confidence what happened in Nonox, but, apparently, this is he is a “petrel”. Thank God that this seemed to be not so much a full -fledged explosion as, most likely, a leak of radioactive fluid, which did not lead to a catastrophic emission of radiation. It is impossible to draw final conclusions: as with the Chernobyl tragedy - the authorities lie.

In general, an extensive military program that threatened with adversaries is not impressive. The dock, which sank, when trying to get from him the "Admiral Kuznetsov", the burned "horser", a fire in military warehouses in Siberia, "Petrel" -

We threaten not yet Pindos, but Arkhangelsk with Achinsky.

It turns out to be more reliable than building a high -tech weapon with batons of demonstrators. Kleptocracy and high technologies are incompatible.