Protest: look and something

Polemic between Parkhomenko and Bogomolov against the background of "revolutionary foam from Balashikha"

I have a favorite character - Alexey Zhuravlev. The long -term deputy of the State Duma, the chairman of the Rodina party, at the source of which Dmitry Rogozin personally stood, has superhuman hard work. Despite such responsible positions, he goes to the TV every day, as in a slaughter. It flows from the channel to the channel, from the program to the program, carries the electorate of truth from morning to evening with a loud, turning into a screaming voice. All topics are available to Zhuravlev, up to the weather.

He gives an exhaustive answer to questions about the abnormal Moscow summer: this “Washington Regional Committee” tries a new climate weapon in Russia.

I am almost ready to agree with such a fresh version. Especially if it is applied not so much to the weather as to the public atmosphere. Exceptionally enemy machinations can explain the transformation of hope into longing. The protests turned into a long series, where the picture is more important than the essence. On the TV - the most favorable law enforcement officers, who, according to the authoritative thought of Tina Kandelaki, are treating violent Protestants almost tenderly. On the Web are the same guards who beat women with their feet in the stomach and breaking their legs with a random person on a morning run. Tighting and cruelty are the main product on both sides of the barricades. True, one side appropriated the right to plant another for without any reason, but these are the features of the chosen historical path.

Rains were blurred by passions in Moscow elections, overshadowed by the topic of straightened civil dignity. Both guardians and liberals fell into a stupor.

The guards continue to stomp in the studios, drowning on the tonsils in Zelensky. On the forefront, no one goes on vacation. The flock cannot be left for a moment without shepherds. Otherwise, how to find out the revelations of Mikhail Delyagin on the themes of the Malaysian Boeing, shot down by Kolomoisky? Inside the frozen, it seemed that for centuries the magmas occur some fermentation. The composition of the speakers is changing. That favorite of propaganda was Platoshkin, but suddenly he disappeared. It was taken by a certain Araik Stepanyan, who has the gift to instantly switch from screaming to a squeal (it seems that these are the main parameters of casting). So far, only Zhuravlev is unshakable. Sometimes fate throws a gift to vocalized people in the form of Olga Buzova.

The Instagram star, who was in the ranking of Putin with her 16 million subscribers, licked a plate on the same Instagram with a tongue. I, they say, the blockade, explained Olga, used to do so.

The sovereign anger did not know the boundaries. All federal channels united in the fight against Buzova. The Holy family of Skabeevs called her to the carpet of the 60 minutes program demanding to immediately apologize. Buzova apologized, but the anger did not get down. Appeals to the prosecutor's office followed to close her Instagram.

The liberals continue to properly walk around the boulevards. In his free time, time is arranged (first “rain”, then “Echo of Moscow”) on YouTube a debate on the topic “View of the protest”. They don’t shout here, as on TV, this is a plus. Here they glance not so much on protest as on each other - this is a minus. This is exactly what happened in the dialogue of Sergei Parkhomenko with Konstantin Bogomolov.

The conversation itself, woven from the web of common places, is absolutely uninteresting. Another thing is interesting - the hidden motives of self -justification. Parkhomenko is easier, he did not change himself and did not change himself. Bogomolov is more complicated. He alternated the beliefs as theaters, for which he was rewarded precisely theater (on Malaya Bronnaya). Nevertheless, the interlocutors, bypassing all other definitions, are people of one worldview. I believe that from my thesis of the time of the marshmalls of the marshmallow and today, despite the bright feeling for Sobyanin, I will not refuse: "Free people cannot breathe in the air of lack of freedom, they have no gills."

The more disgusting the degree of Solovyevchina in these debates. In the camp of Russian freethinkers and more than two centuries ago, disputes flowed violently.

To what was the non -contained person Belinsky, including in the polemic with Granovsky, but to the abomination of the trunk question - who was “on the sunset” - he could not sink even in a terrible dream.

Fortunately, they did not have Facebook on which the charges continued. No one remembered political response, about permanent administrative punishments, about the student as a new force, dormant for the last hundred years. Driveki threw Ksenia Sobchak into the fire, seemingly the bride of Bogomolova, who called the protest of "revolutionary foam from Balashikha." And the groom himself distinguished himself well. He began to report to Parkhomenko for working at the American Institute of Kennan. The plot is closed. Bogomolov transformed into Zhuravlev with his immortal "Washington regional committee."

In different political camps, the exhaustion of forms is felt. Tynyanov called such a time (in relation to literature). It seems that the gap is our main time. However, there is good news. The Petersburg acting governor Alexander Beglov instructed to install the birdhouses in all parks of the city. He wants "so that the birds can visit these parks so that it is also convenient for them." General humanists have not yet been transferred in the Fatherland.