Johnson's prophet

Britain Prime Minister drove the parliament for additional holidays - so as not to interfere

The new British Prime Minister Boris Johnson began his duties. He made the first foreign tour to Europe, starting with Germany, drove to France, participated in the G-7 summit and returned to London empty-handed. He did not manage to move the Europeans to revise the agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, signed with Teresa May 10 months ago.

European leaders politely but extremely clearly stated that there would be no changes. The Irish “Bestop” - a regime that guarantees the absence of a hard border between the Republic of Ireland and British Northern Ireland in the case of Brexit, will not be canceled. In addition, if Britain, as Johnson argues, will decide to “save” on the compensation, leaving the community without a transaction, and will not pay the European Union debts and compensation in the amount of 39 billion euros for Brexit, as the European Commissioner for Economics and Finance Pierre Muscovable said, in this case, there are no talk about future relations with the EU at all.

Unable to cope with the Europeans, Johnson decided to deal with the British parliament.

He asked the Queen of Great Britain Elizabeth II to consent to the suspension of the work of the parliament for 4.5-5 weeks (from September 9-12 to October 14).

Korolev signed the petition of her prime minister.

Protective (from lat. Prorogatio - extension; English prorogation) - a British mechanism, for many decades a technical, which stops the session of the parliament. All laws in the development process are canceled. The “reboot” usually occurs annually, sometimes before universal elections, and takes several days: from three, as, for example, in 2010, up to twenty in 2014. The work of the parliament is resumed by the queen’s speech about the tasks for a new session prepared by the current prime minister.

Johnson said that an unprecedented “propagation” is needed because his government is preparing and going to present a new ambitious sword program. However, reality immediately surfaced to the surface - Johnson's supporters, of course, talked. The conservative “telegraph” wrote that this decision is no more, no less, “Johnson's Falkland War”. That is, the battle in which a crushing victory over the “enemy” (obviously opposition in parliament), necessary for conducting a large -scale reform program, described the newspaper as “the greatest political adventure in the latest history” will be won.

The recognition of the Minister of Defense of Britain Ben Wallace, who, on the sidelines of the meeting in Helsinki, explained the real reason for the suspension of the work of the House of Commons on the sidelines of the meeting of the House of Commons on the sidelines of the meeting. “The Minister of Defense was caught that the real reason for the closure of the parliament” - with such a heading, the Mirror's left tabloid was released. “The parliament was very good in saying what he did not want. It was terrible to say what he wanted. This is reality, ”Wallace explained to a colleague. “So, in the end, any leader must, well, you know, try.”

He developed his thought:

“Our system is the“ winner receives everything ”system. If you win the parliamentary majority, you control everything, you control the schedule.

There is no written separation, so ... in general, you command all this. And we suddenly found ourselves without a majority and coalition, and this is not easy for our system. ”

The BBC managed to accidentally record this conversation on the television camera. The certificate will be attached to the lawsuit, the initiators of court examinations promised.

Naturally, the opposition, rapidly united against the non -contractual Brexit and Johnson himself, immediately announced an attack on parliamentary democracy and the constitutional coup.

The parliament voted three times against an agreement with Brussels in its current form, at the same time categorically opposing the non -contractual Brexit. Parliamentarians are sure that such a way out of the EU will cause serious damage to the British economy - the UK will lose unhindered access to the European market, prices will rise, an economic recession will begin. The country will tolerate a serious diplomatic defeat. Therefore, most opposition deputies of parliament and even many representatives of the Johnson party do not want to leave the EU without an agreement and emphasize in a joint statement that the prime minister does not have a mandate.

At the beginning of the week, the opposition - the Labor, the Scottish National Party, the liberal democrats, the “green”, “Plady Kimru” Wales, independent of the “Change Great Britain” group - agreed on the general plan for stopping the process of the non -contractual Brexit.

Legislative work was put forward in the first place to make the prime minister ask the EU to extend the negotiation window under Article 50 (an article by the Lisbon Treaty on the possibility of leaving the EU), as well as prohibit the Brexit without an agreement with the EU. The question of expressing mistrust of the conservatives to the government (and most importantly - disputes about the candidate for the role of the temporary prime minister in the Government of National Consent in case of success of voting on distrust) was decided to postpone it for extreme cases.

In response, a day after the opposition agreement on the unification, the messengers took the queen's petition for the prophetic, which she traditionally signed. For 67 years, Elizabeth II strictly adhered to the rule not to engage in politics. However, she hoped that the government had the mind in response and respect not to involve her in making conflicting decisions. Boris Johnson, the 14th Prime Minister of Great Britain, nevertheless, pulled the queen “into a controversial decision,” the BBC believes.

The speaker of the parliament John Bercow called the current prophetment "constitutional outrage."

The “whip” of the government in the upper house George Young resigned in protest, claiming that this step risks "undermining the fundamental role of parliament."

According to the status conservative, the former Minister of Pensions and Labor, and then the Justice of David GOK, the prophetic brought to the ranks of the opposition "many new brave conservatives who are freed from the restrictions of the government who are ready and want to vote against their leader next week."

And what about the people? According to an authoritative hundred -band, 47 percent of citizens consider the closure of parliament to be “unacceptable”, 27 percent “acceptable” (26 percent could not evaluate the event). On August 28, massive spontaneous protests against Johnson’s decision were held on the streets of London, Manchester, Edinburgh and a number of other cities. In London, where the most people gathered, demonstrators at the parliament building chanted “Stop the package” and waved the flags of the European Union. The pound of sterling fell significantly after the news of the news. The FTSE 250 index, which evaluates companies focused on the British economy, also began to decline.

The struggle has begun. The group of 75 parliamentarians seeks the adoption of a judicial ban on suspension of parliament in the Scottish court, the hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 3. The Court of Northern Ireland will consider a similar request on the next Friday. Investment banker Gina Miller with the same star team of lawyers who in 2017 in the Supreme Court proved that the 2016 referendum is advisory in nature, filed a lawsuit against the Supreme Court against the closure of parliament for political purposes. John Meijor, Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1990-1997 confirmed this previously promise to act in defense of parliament rights and testify in court.

Legislators will return from vacation on September 3. If the proposition will still take place, they will have 6 or 9 days before and just two weeks after the parliament’s work is suspended to prevent the country from leaving the EU without an agreement. Deputies study the opportunity to hold meetings on Friday, Saturday and Sunday until the alleged violent break.

The BBC reports that most likely a law prohibiting him without a contract will be introduced again. In this way, at one time, the opposition forced the previous Prime Minister Teresa May to ask for a delay from the EU.

The case may come to an attempt to shift the Johnson government by voting a vote of mistrust.

A fundamental issue is the candidate for the temporary position of the Prime Minister of the Government of National Unity. However, even the respectable bourgeois British British Times in the editorial article, sharing the fears about the leader of the Left Marxist Korbin, emphasizes that today the “main priority should be the protection of British democracy”.

They say that sleeping bags for night meetings and voting are already waiting for deputies of the British parliament.

The historical meeting will open on September 3 on Tuesday at 14.30 in Greenwich.