Russia is under Ganus

The head of Rusad called for the identification of Russians “with great powers” ​​who replaced the Doping Industry base. It was only heard by New York Times

Only this was not enough - so that the head of the Russada Yuri Ganus would be in the same company with the accomplices of “Inquisitors”, and even added heat to the discussion of new Russian sins associated with the ill -fated database of the Moscow Anti -Doping Laboratory. But this is exactly what happened at the Great International Sports Conference in the American Colorado-Springs, where the revelations of the Russian representative seemed to be even surprised by the journalist Hyo Seppelt, the head of the American anti-doping agency Tigert, the author of the film "Icarus" about Grigory Rodchenko Brian Fogel, and other experienced "Evil".

In Russia, Ganus turned out to be the only one who, from the first messages about the beginning of the investigation of the “laboratory case” about the changes allegedly made to the database by the Russian side, began to beat the alarm sequentially, convicting and accusing the dark forces that prevent sports Russia from embarking on the path of correction and at least partially change the mentality. The statements of the head of Rusad became tougher, while almost no one publicly pulled it out - there was no reaction at all, as if a person screams into the void. In any case, in the reports about the Grand -Grandmother forum “Russia - Sports Power”, the references to a specific problem in Nizhny Novgorod, capable of plunging Russia in the very near future in the gloomy times of adverseness, was brilliantly absent.

And Yuri Alexandrovich Ganus was not childish,

From foggy hints, coming closer and closer to the specifics. The main message of his numerous speeches before entering the forefront in Colorado was that Wada’s claims regarding the integrity of the electronic database, transferred by the Russian side in January of this year, are based on clear conclusions of experts. That frauds were made, including at the end of last year, that is, at the very last moment, before the second visit of the “selection committee”. What they carried out by people who "sold their souls to the devil", but who are these mysterious attackers and who they tried to get out of the blow, can only be assumed.

The conclusion sounded terrible: Russia in the eyes of the world sports community appears as a recidivist with consequences catastrophic for all Russian sports.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Sports, with the help of certain independent experts in the field of information technology, sent a letter to WADA with answers to the 31 -specific issue of changes in the transmitted database posed by the Committee on Compliance with the organization. This was done two days before the expiration of the three -week period, which was given to Vada to the Russian side. It should be noted that the department of Yuri Ganus was involved in either the data transfer process or the preparation of arguments.

Yuri Aleksandrovich, obviously, Va-Bank went solely because he failed to reach the very top. The sharp tone of his numerous statements is also associated with this, which reached a peak in Colorado-Springs and was finally heard-not the reaction to whom the head of Rusada was counting on, but by the New York Times with the newspaper. It was this solid publication that, according to Yuri Ganus, that changes in the database of the Moscow Anti -Doping Laboratory were made in order not to damage the reputations of famous athletes, now holding high posts in state structures or becoming large sports functionaries. Accordingly, only people with very great powers could give access to the printed investigative committee of the Russian Federation. The fact that the seizure by a number of thousands of disappeared or changed files was produced precisely by the Russian side was there no doubt with a newcomer: “Everything has already been proven ... everything there was done systemically and organized.”

Yuri Ganus proposed to receive concrete answers from the Minister of Sports Pavel Kolobkov, to whose department they lead, according to the head of Rusad, a thread of conspiracy against Russian sports. The famous fencer and former deputy Vitaly Mutko very gently replied that "such serious accusations are needed for such serious reasons." If we take the reaction of officials, then the collision turned out to be surprisingly weak - for example, the deputy chairman of the relevant State Duma Committee, the famous coach Valery Gazzaev believes that the Escapades of Ganus are "unprofessional, unethical and non -poatry."

The public, in the person of patriotic representatives, went much further, directly calling Yuri Ganus New Rodchenkov, Russophobe and a traitor.

Of course, it is impossible to arrange an open grass of Ganus due to the fact that this will only prove his case, and a strong trump card will fall into the hands of all ill -wishers. During the year of full work after the restoration of the status, the Ganus agency has gained a stable positive reputation, the uncompromising of the new chapter in the fight against doping could not but impress, he certainly fulfilled the tasks of improving the image of Russia. The fact that Ganus, possibly, was assigned a role in renewal of the facade, and no more, and forced him to “exceed the powers” ​​and climb into their affairs, which are unnamed and consider the work to cleanse Russian sports - naturally, cleansing in their understanding.

Of course, Ganus is trying with all his might to bring his organization out of the blow, in every possible way emphasizing its non-participation in the dark affairs of the new time. But what is the reprehensible in this, if it is precisely on the full functioning of Rusad that not only participation in the Olympiads and in general the presence in the world sports movement, but also the future of all Russian sports? Another thing is that if you have to punish Russia, then the sanctions will begin with Rusad, because it is supposed to, regardless of the fact that there is no guilt behind the agency in a particular case with a “laboratory case” and close. So Yuri Ganus proposed to repent Vada’s blow and even before the verdict was carried out, no matter what it would be, to identify and publicly punish all the guilty in the second, after Sochi, possible grandiose fraud. Well, this was completely enough Yuri Alexandrovich over the edge, since of all the defendants of Sochi, we know only Grigory Rodchenkov, a couple of his subordinates and a couple of quietly dismissed officials of the Ministry of Sports, and by no means customers.

It would be a height of naivety to believe that already in the middle of the week the commission on compliance, headed by Jonathan Taylor, will issue exhaustive recommendations to the executive committee of Vad, and we will receive answers to all questions. Russia, as you know, has its large experts in the field of information technology, and, if they were attracted, the outcome of the cyberspes is far from clear. But in any case, it would be better to deal with your jambs yourself than to bring the matter to the next international scandal. What needs political will, but it is directed in a completely different direction. Not by words (the words are correct), but in fact, even if Yuri Ganus laid the straw, saying that

The "who sold their souls to the devil" attackers "set up not only sport, but also supreme power."

The donkey of the head of Rusada has its own causes and its nature, almost every loud statement allows various interpretations and versions, it does not either agree or simply not admit to knowledge of the true state of things, or naive more than the cunning: “Our sport is worthy of a full -fledged membership in an international sports family, but before we need to remove unacceptable approaches and methods, and persons who have brought it to a dead end and a dead end and a deadline and persons Discredited in the eyes of the world. " What is it, if not the fight against windmills?

However, you can’t argue with the quintessence for today: bypassing the unsightly past, you can lose the future. This thesis does not imply any double interpretations.