Dangerous ties

In the Serpukhov district, property continues to remove the property from all persons who have ever dealt with Alexander Shestun

On November 8, on the evening of Friday, which is also not entirely usually, the Prosecutor General’s Office announced the discovery of criminally acquired property from the former head of the Serpukhov district for another billion rubles. Like the last time, this is some exaggeration: earlier the Prosecutor General’s Office reported about the seizure of his property for 10 billion rubles, but even formally in the filed and satisfied lawsuated the property was 2.6 billion (according to approximate estimation, not taking into account the time of its acquisition).

On the same day, we contacted the wife of Shestun Julia and his friend Boris Krivodubsky, who is accused with him in one of the two excited cases and is now out of reach of Russian “law enforcement agencies”. Both reported that they learned about the new lawsuit from the interfax’s message: “We would have to read it ourselves.”

Krivodubsky has some guesses, however,. Some time ago, one long and distant acquaintance contacted him, with whom around 2003, before the election of a six, they established a LLC that owned a car sink. Subsequently, Krivodubsky came out of this business, and in October of this year, his former partner decided to rent part of the sink for rent. But in the registration chamber, he was refused to assure the necessary documents, saying that security arrest was imposed on the sink.

The details and reasons for the arrest of the sink, as well as what and whose other property could be arrested, refused to inform the owner.

Attempts by lawyers of the LLC to get an answer to these questions also did not lead to anything: officials and notaries frightened by challenges in the UK categorically refused to do their work.

Nevertheless, lawyers managed to get a list of 27 objects and land plots belonging to various legal and individuals, the good half of which, according to him, Krivodubsky had never heard anything. The prosecutor’s office says, meanwhile, “800 objects”, among which there can be both business objects and areas bought and bought by different people in different years, as well as houses built on them.

These owners can now only sympathize with how we condolen those who have comprehended a natural disaster. The consideration of the last claim (about “10 billion”) in Krasnogorsk (not by jurisdiction) and the Moscow Regional Court showed that the acquaintance or some intersection with Shestun (and now Krivodubsky, who had never held any posts in the region), is “Stigma”, and no one will listen to the arguments of conscientious acquirers.

In parallel, the refusal to determine the Constitutional Court, received by the defense of Colonel Zakharchenko in a similar case of deprivation of property, was interpreted in some media as a “tracing paper” of the property “case of a sixstone”. This is not entirely accurate: the statements of the relatives of Shestun, as well as strangers to him, deprived of the property as a result of the case of “10 billion”, really entered the Constitutional Court, but they were filed on other grounds: first of all, on the fact that many objects acquired before the Shestun became the head of the district. There are no response from the Constitutional Court of these statements yet. In addition, even in the case of Zakharchenko, it was only about refusing to consider the complaint in connection with its unacceptability. It is wrong to say that the Constitutional Court has already formed its position on this issue.