The authors of the bill on the prevention of domestic violence are threatened by reprisal by mail and in social networks

The developers of the bill on domestic violence turned into power structures due to incoming threats addressed to them. According to the co -author of the bill, State Duma deputy Oksana Pushkina, she receives threats in social networks and e -mail herself, lawyer Alexei Parshin, who defends the Khachaturian sisters, lawyer Marie Davtyan and the creator of the mutual assistance network for women #Tyneodna Alena Popova.

"In fact, all people who participated in this bill as co -authors come in social networks," said Pushkina RBC . She noted that letters against the bill were also massively received by many deputies and members of the Federation Council. The Duma Committee on Education and Science even conducted an unofficial investigation in connection with the newsletter.

“It turned out that the“ authors ”of letters do not know what is being said at all, they did not send such letters to the State Duma and did not understand how their email addresses were among the attackers. Either the phone numbers indicated in the letters do not belong to anyone, that is, they were invented,” said Pushkin RIA Novosti .

Lawyer Parshin said that threats were coming to his family. Marie Davtyan emphasized that we are talking about a real threat to people's lives. “First of all, Oksana Pushkina is threatened, an incredible number of cruel letters come to her, and she goes through all the borders. Alexei Parshina also goes to the bill and the Khachaturian sisters. I get the least, but the threats go about the reprisal, write about how they will physically understand us,” said the lawyer of the Echo Moscow radio station.

Davtyan noted that the forums write "terrible things" about hypothetical ways of reprisals against the authors of the bill on domestic violence. “We have long said that people who act very actively, and very aggressively against this law, are primarily the authors of the violence, which we are going to fight against,” Davtyan said. She added that the initiators of the bill do not want to, “in order for someone to plant for words,” but law enforcement agencies must find out how real the threats are.

Oksana Pushkina believes that a “well -organized and financial campaign” unfolded against the bill, similar to the protests around the film by Alexei Matilda, Matilda. The discussion of the initiative in the State Duma in October was almost disrupted by the “same people” who protested because of Matilda. Before the building of the Federation Council, the participants of the discussion were greeted with cries and insults.

Previously, the Matilda’s “forty forty -forty movement” declared the “All -Russian resistance campaign” by the Law on domestic violence and launched a petition with a demand to exclude Oksana Pushkin from the State Duma Committee, as well as demand aparts to the Archpriest Dimitry Smirnov.

Pushkin called for the excommunication of the clergyman from the church after he at a meeting with the pupils of the orphanage said that he had "gave the mowing" to the boy to wean him from the mat. The Russian Orthodox Church suggested that the Archpriest was joking. Pushkin suggested conducting a check against Smirnov, who regularly allows herself controversial public statements.

The forty -forty -forty coordinator Andrei Kormukhin told the Echo of Moscow that the movement has nothing to do with threats to Pushkina and her colleagues. “If the threat to consider the request for the leadership of the State Duma to deprive Pushkin of her position - the deputy chairman of the family committee, then this is hardly a threat. This is the demand of Russian citizens in relation to the body called the people's body,” Kormukhin explained.

"When Oksana Pushkin, a person who has a sufficiently distant attitude towards Orthodoxy, begins to behave in a hamian in relation to the priests of the Russian Orthodox Church, we believe that this is unworthy of the title of deputy chairman of the family affairs committee that she now occupies. Moreover, I, as the father of a large family, who lived with his wife 25 years old, I consider that a person who has actually ruined four marriages is the deputy chairman of the committee State Duma, ”Kormukhin added.

In mid -October 182, regional Orthodox and parental organizations in an open letter called on President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin to prevent the adoption of the law on the prevention of domestic violence, saying that he is "frankly destructive".

"The bill, which is the product of the radical anti -family ideology of feminism, etc." Gender ideology ", will become an instrument of the radical and violent change in the foundations of Russian society, the destruction of our traditional family and moral values." The authors of the letter emphasized that among human rights defenders who support the bill are organizations that defend the “interests of homosexuals and lesbians” and “radical feminist structures”, as well as “foreign agents”.

The data that more than 80% of the crimes against children is committed precisely in families , the authors of the letter were called a lie. In their opinion, the bill violates the constitutional rights of Russians to the "inviolability of private life and home, private property, to freedom of movement, the right of parents to raise children", and is also aimed at "discrimination of men and the destruction of the family."

In particular, the indignation of opponents of the initiative caused a proposal for "protective prescriptions" in the interests of the victims of domestic violence. The point is that a family member accused by households of aggression may limit contacts with the victim of violence, prohibit its search and persecution. Defenders of "traditional values" are afraid that in this way "the wife’s desire to make peace with his wife can turn into a prison."