In the city of Pokrov, Vladimir Region, Konstantin Kotov, convicted under the “Dadin” article of repeated violation of the rules of participation in the action (Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code), was reprimanded in correctional colony No. 2. Eldar Garoz, lawyer of the Public Verdict Foundation, announced this on his Facebook page.
reports The formal reason for the reprimand was the action of another prisoner: during a walk, he gave Kotov his gloves so that he would not freeze. Both convicts received a reprimand for this.
“And to Kotov’s demand to be given the opportunity to contact lawyer Maria Eismont so that she could represent his interests at the disciplinary commission, the head of the colony replied that this was “illegal.” All this is being done specifically so that other convicts are afraid to communicate with Kotov for fear of receiving punishment, and he becomes an outcast,” writes Garoz.
because of Lawyer Maria Eismont on her Facebook page that she plans to appeal Kotov’s reprimand. The lawyer also announced her readiness to appeal the reprimand of the second prisoner if he agrees. According to Eismont, the convict who handed over the gloves was already about to be released (parole).
Maria Eismont noted that she was on parole. On January 21, she visited her client and posted on Facebook that a FSIN employee was writing another report against Kotov: the convict allegedly did not say hello to him.
On January 23, she told - civil activist Konstantin Kotov on September 5 to four years in prison under the “Dada” article (Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code) for participation in, near the FSB building, in support of Ivan Golunov and after the rally for fair elections on August 10, as well as a call to leave independent candidates to the Moscow City Duma were not allowed to enter Trubnaya Square before the elections. sentenced because of the rally in support of Azat Miftakhov, the rally “In Defense of the New Generation”, a walk due to - Appeal against the verdict of Konstantin Kotov by 14 lawyers. An agreement was concluded with each of them for the amount of 212 rubles 10 kopecks. The Moscow City Court upheld the verdict. submitted without changes