The irreparable happened

Supporters of the theory of Western conspiracy against Russia also decided to change the constitution

On Wednesday, February 19, a team in the center of Moscow gathered in the “President-Hotel” to save the world from the future “Ecumenical Flood”. In the Gzhel Hall - a small room trimmed with wood and examples of Russian folk art - a little more than one and a half dozen people who presented a new ideological construct “Russia - the new Noah's Ark of mankind” fit. It is this ideology, from the point of view of the audience, should be entered into the constitution as the main one, and the clause that ideology is prohibited should be thrown out as quickly as possible, since the universal disaster on the threshold.

To the beautiful Ararat of the future, humanity was proposed to lead political scientists, Orthodox publicists, psychologists and one ex-worker of the DPR Foreign Ministry. All of them were gathered by supporters of the idea that the participants in the concept of the “Noah's Ark” “are ready to propose and consider the possibilities of saving the planet and ways to overcome the civilizational crisis in various fields.” Naturally, the crisis should be overcome from the "positions of Russia, for the peoples of which, primarily the Russian people, is characterized by worldly responsiveness." Two participants in the semi-divided Dream-Sim-psychologist Yuri Gromyko and a member of the “Party of Case” Yuri Krupnov-even wrote a book on this subject: in it they openly admit that they “play” the “game” way as Noah and his sons, but quite seriously treat the ideas of catastrophe and the construction of the ark. ”

The essence of the ideology that needs to be introduced as dominant into the constitution, but which will save the world, it is difficult to describe in short: it is a crazy vinaigrette from philosophy, history, religion and political science mixed in completely arbitrary proportions. But if you reduce the 200-page operation guide to five theses, you will turn out the following:

• We got into the gap between times. If we do not determine what time to go to, we may never go there. Existence in timelessness is already a flood of meaningless events that we cannot process and self -predict;

• Russian Noah's Ark is a Russian project. Russians need a big Russian business. Putin completed the transition from comprador capitalism to national, but that is why Russia was in the civilizational blockade. It was worth Putin to demonstrate the independence of Russia in the Munich speech, as the civilizational clash rolled in the growing;

• The task of the enemies of Russia (among them, of course, the Anglo-Saxon transatlantic) is to destroy the country by transforming the rebellious anthropology of Russian civilization into biorobots. But a Russian person does not believe that super -complex machines can calculate the unpredictable human action;

• The flood is a flood of dollars, and an ark is a focus of civilization of the future (and a model is a model of the manager of the future). A person in Russia-Kovcheg should avoid any robotization and mechanism, should be aware of the methods of action on it of any medications and devices. It is not necessary to slide into the archaic, but it is necessary to set the task of constant reproduction of the human in a person - that is, what is already conscious of a world -wide planetary person;

• In a situation of impending disaster, it is useless to calm the population with indexing pensions. It is necessary to overcome the deadliness and apathy in society and finally build an ark on which the Russians will rule (but not like the West, but better).

If you did not understand anything, then one of the two: either you will not be taken to the ark, or you are not “born in Yekaterinburg” - in the same place as the idea of ​​a new flood. The idea to organize a “strategic session” in Moscow was born after a forum in the Urals, which also discussed the concept of a new ideology, explained Ivan Pyshchinsky, director of the Universal competencies of the URFU, a business trainer and candidate of philosophical sciences.

According to him, the response from people whom “no one drove to the forum” is amazing: “There was a queue to the microphone” - which means that this topic is relevant for a wide variety of segments of the population. “This response allowed us to talk about this [concept] here, at the President’s hotel, along with our experts,” Tyschinsky explained, adding that the forum participants in Yekaterinburg are still writing to him and are ready to make their proposals to the concept.

Apparently, soulless people live in Moscow: only a couple of journalists came to the meeting of the Arking “Stratkom”.

One of the authors of the concept of the ark Yuri Gromyko (he is also the author of the book “Rashinz’s self -determination” in the global world ”) explained that the concept set forth in the book was based on the work of Sergei Pisarev, the“ Orthodox Man and the Entrepreneur ”, the head of the Russian Entrepreneur Foundation, which 10 years ago tried to formulate a“ value platform, which is very important. ” “Russian entrepreneur” is friends with the vice speaker of the State Duma Irina Yarova: on her website in the “Our Partners” section, it is said that “the main types of activity of the fund are expert analytical activities, media projects, the creation of film, video and animation products, book publishing,“ folk diplomacy ”(establishing dialogue and cultural elites of foreign countries).” According to Gromyko, one of the decisions of the Yekaterinburg part of the forum is to achieve the cessation of the deprivation of the Russian state of the ideological platform and cancel part 2 of Article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

Another co -author of the book, Yuri Krupnov (in his arsenal there is also the authorship of the Enterian Orc Book on the Fifth World War), noted that he was cautiously looking at all the last constitutional initiatives, about which he “said literally an hour after the President’s message“ Komsomolskaya Pravda ”.” “From my point of view, this is a very dangerous experiment, and the only way that this experiment does not end with another disaster of a geopolitical scale,” a powerful ideology to the constitutional process, ”Krupnov said anxiously.

On the discussion about the need to change the constitution, the former representative of the DPR Foreign Ministry in Moscow, Daria Mitina, suddenly appeared. By her own admission, she “did not quite understand, as whom she was invited,” but noted that he is a “purely ideological” person, representing a certain “segment of our ideological spectrum”. Her speech came true that she is wary of attempts to touch the 13th and 14th articles of the Constitution, so the microphone quickly moved to other "professionals of their business, who are configured to transform and love and respect Russia."

The Orthodox publicist Vitaly Averyanov said that on the website of the Izborsky Club, chaired by writer Alexander Prokhanov, editor -in -chief of the newspaper “Tomorrow”, the other day published the collective labor “Russian Ark. Alternative strategy of world development. ” He noted that the origins of the second “ark” were the same, but they did not manage to release this book last year due to the preparation of a certain “creed of the Russian dream”. However, according to Averyanov, such a radical version is unlikely to be accepted, although it was written in the same channel with the materials of Krupnov and Gromyko. “I would like to object to those who say that this is irrelevant. If you look at all this from a political technological and sociological point of view, then there are not many signs indicating the need of a new ideological document. However, we have an information of a closed nature, which says that the ideology in such a wording - Russia as Noah's Ark - is today considered by the top of the political elite as an important trend, ”Averyanov shared Insider.

Actually, this is the main fork and at the same time the main catch of supporters of the ark: they have knowledge, and then what? Trying to promote the concept through the same referendum as proposed by a working group to change the constitution, now or act kuluarno? Perhaps this would be discussed further, but the hall was paid only for two hours, and after the end of the discussion, the participants - including those who read the newspaper in parallel or studied the properties of air filters in their laptop - quickly got up and left. “I hope it was not quite boring,” Yuri Krupnov had finally expressed hope.

Anastasia Torop, Vyacheslav Polovinko, "New"

A sharp desire to rule

What other non -standard ideas for amendments to the Constitution are suggested by those who wish to participate in the modernization of the basic law of the country.

1. & nbsping a faith in God
Patriarch Kirill proposed to include a mention of God in the preamble of the Constitution: “Let's pray, work so that God be mentioned in our main law. Because most Russian citizens believe in God, ”said Cyril.

Author: Patriarch Kirill, Vitaly Milonov spoke with the same initiative.

The reaction of the working group: the amendment was supported by Senator Andrei Klishas, ​​but Pavel Krasheninnikov, the head of the State Duma Committee on State Building and Legislation, did not support. “God, if he is in his soul, then he is, regardless of whether he will be registered in the text of the law or not,” Krasheninnikov said.

2. & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp amendment on the special role of the Russian people
“We must write that the Russian people are a state -forming people. In our country, different nations live for many centuries. But not one of these peoples, although participated in the creation, strengthening of our state, all the peoples served selflessly and heroically, but only the Russians have the instinct of creating a state, ”said Dimitri Smirnov, the head of the Patriarchal Commission on Family Affairs.

Authors: Archpriest Dimitri Smirnov and (separately) head of the Communist Party Gennady Zyuganov.

The reaction of the working group: no.

3. Amendment on Russians in the Constitution

“I propose to introduce the following wording to the beginning of the preamble of the Constitution of the Russian Federation instead of the previous wording:“ We, Russians, who, in alliance with other fraternal peoples, rallied into the multinational people of the Russian Federation, connected by a common fate on their land. ”

Author: State Duma deputy Konstantin Zatulin.

The author’s commentary for “new”: - [I decided to separately distinguish in the Russian Constitution], because other peoples stand out in the constitution in the name of those national republics, in the constitutional acts of which there is a certain idea of ​​these peoples as the title nations that gave an impulse, the name of a particular national republic. In the context of the national-state structure of Russia, the subjectivity of the national Russian people should be reflected in the Constitution. At the same time, I am not going to question the facts of multinationality, the gradual formation of the multinational people. I do not throw these words from the constitution. But the Russian people, as a people, the most numerous and played the main role in the formation of the Russian Federation and Russia, as such should be mentioned in the constitution.

The reaction of the working group: no, but on February 19, the same Pavel Krasheninnikov stated that it was not worth touching the preamble of the Constitution.

4. & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp marriage amendment
The Constitution offered to fix the norm that marriage is an alliance between a man and a woman. “This is a practical norm that will allow Russia in the future not to take into account the decisions of international organizations that concern the consolidation of special rights behind minorities, for LGBT. And only the presence of this norm in the Constitution, and not in the Family Code, precisely in the main law of the country, will allow us to the future, for many years to save the traditional family and the possibility of marriage for a man and a woman, ”explained the author of the initiative Peter Tolstoy.

The authors of the idea: Deputy Head of the World Russian People's Cathedral Konstantin Malofeev, as well as the Vice Speaker of the State Duma Peter Tolstoy.

The reaction of the working group: Andrei Klishas supported the amendment, and Vladimir Putin later spoke approvingly.

5. & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp amendments to abortion & nbsp
The preamble of the Constitution proposed to fix the "child’s right to special protection and care, including proper legal protection, both before and after birth."

The author of the idea: State Duma deputy Vitaly Milonov.

The author’s commentary for the “new”: in the Constitution I want to establish a moral declaration more likely that Russia recognizes human rights from the moment of its biological conception. This is what science is talking about now, medicine, is that a person’s life begins from his very first days. At first it occurs in the womb, then - outside, but the human life does not change from this. You cannot deny the presence of a person [until the moment of birth].

The reaction of the working group: no.

6. & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp amendment
The Constitution was proposed to include the provision on the inadmissibility of interference in the affairs of Russia.

Author: Member of the working group Yaroslav Nilov.

The author’s commentary for the “new”: developing the idea that we are part of the world community, and developing article 79, I proposed supplementing Article 79 or introducing a new article 79.1. Emphasizing that this amendment is ideological in nature, I proposed a number of formulations. For example, measures can be taken in the country to strengthen peace and security, to maintain peace and security, to ensure peaceful coexistence of peoples, to protect universal values ​​and to prevent intervention in internal affairs. These are declarative norms that record the goals and objectives that the Russian state and its citizens define for themselves as priority. This norm will work in the same way as others work, similar and content similar norms, and will be a guide for the development of industry legislation, which is now developing.

The reaction of the working group: co -chair of the working group, Talia Khabrieva, noted that the legal structure can still be discussed, but "now the time has come to place accents in this area."

7. & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp & nbsp amendment to the country
The Constitution was proposed to introduce the national motto of the country to be developed. Among the proposed options of the author of the initiative: “The people are the winner”, “The first in space”, “Glory, our Fatherland is free!”, “God, state, nation, family”.

The author of the idea: Member of the Public Chamber Sultan Khamzaev.

The author’s commentary for the “new”: “It was important for me to open a discussion so that we would discuss not only whether we should enter a loaf of bread or a loaf of sausage into the Constitution - that for people. We must discuss factors that are important from the point of view of a great, global, emotional, educational nature for the state.

It's just that this is a good offer: when we are talking about raising children, about raising youth, there should be a slogan for them. I myself thought for a long time how it should be. He must unite everyone, and not make additional disputes. Personally, the slogan “The First in Cosmos” is pretty to me: it is good because it is historically justified. The first satellite in space is ours, the first person in space is ours, the first person in outer space is ours, our first woman in space is ours. Perhaps some technologies have now gone a little further in some countries, but the fact remains. ”

The reaction of the working group: no.

Prepared by Daria Kozlova, "New"