
The first channel unexpectedly for everyone broke his own grid and put on the air the documentary “Sobchak’s case”, dedicating the show by the 20th anniversary of the death of the first St. Petersburg mayor. In principle, this happens on TV: one of the greats goes into another world, and channels urgently make changes to their program. As you know, a person is mortal, and sometimes suddenly mortal, that’s the trick. However, the departure date of Anatoly Sobchak has been unchanged for two decades. And program planning on the TV channels is long -term - there are even special people who track future memorable dates to illuminate them on time on their air. The film “Sobchak’s Case” was not shot today or even yesterday, but two years ago. Then he went out, and nothing prevented the program services from planning and putting it on the air without hacking the grid.
Although no. Something interfered. For example, a catastrophic timing for current television (for more than two hours). The maximum that television channels go to in the rarest cases is to divide such a movie into several parts and show two or three days in a row under the heading “Cinema NOT ALL” in a deaf at night.
In general, whatever one may say, and this action seems unprecedented. And at least two explanations. The author of the idea and co -author of the script of the film is Ksenia Sobchak, who since last week again found refuge on the coveted first channel. Now she is at least three times a week, leads the Doc Tok program, declared to her by the revolution in the current genre of talk shows. The “revolution” is in fact not much different from the formats of the formats of Malakhov-Borisov, but it seems that Ksenia or the leadership of the channel confuses this. Sobchak was clearly issued a carte blanche, and that is why the show of an “informal” film about his father turned out to be possible.
The second is the main thing: participation in the film of Vladimir Putin, who back in September 2017 gave Ksenia Sobchak a great interview, after which he, according to rumors, blessed her to participate in the presidential election. To revitalize, so to speak, a pre -demanded dull campaign, into which she brought some “zest”, having even managed to attract other gullible liberals to her side.
In the film, the purpose of which, according to Ksenia Sobchak, to tell the whole truth about his father, can be traced all the way Anatoly Sobchak in power-starting from the first congress of people's deputies in 1989 and ending with care in 2000. And all this time next to the deputy, then the mayor, and then the disgraced politician, was his faithful student, assistant and associate of Volodya Putin, with whom, according to the wife of the Sobchak’s wife Lyudmila Narisova, her husband was comfortable and reliable. Others betrayed, slandered, poisoned. Putin - never!
In the film, he, in fact, is the main and positive hero. He is next to the boss during the coup. He categorically refuses to play in the same team with a competitor and opponent of Sobchak Vladimir Yakovlev - noble and ideas about honor do not allow. He saves his sick teacher, exposing the real danger of himself and his career barely going uphill. After Yeltsin’s retirement, he inspires the political outcast to Sobchak’s hope for the best future: “Wow, my Vova is president!” He finally interrupts his election tour to take his deceased teacher on the last journey.
Against this blessed background of the declaration of Anatoly Sobchak on the main principles of a democratic state - the protection of human rights, equal rights of man and the state - seem beautiful, but not realized in practice the ideas of the intellectual in power. "Would Sobchak go to the square in 2011?" - asks the protagonist Ksenia Sobchak. “He would not do anything that could harm the head of state,” Vladimir Putin answers with confidence.
Well, the timeliness of the extracurricular show of the film on the first channel confirmed Putin’s visit to St. Petersburg on the day of the 20th anniversary of the death of Sobchak, which, of course, was told by all the news. I cut it several hours in my tense graphics to remember the teacher.
Andrei Kolesnikov, Putin’s favorite journalist and his faithful chronicler (author of the books “from the first person”, “I saw Putin”, etc.), gave an interview to Yuri Dudu this week. And, most likely, I regretted it more than once. A shark of a pen and a master of words came - a bewildered and crushed after the "children's" questions of a young colleague left. The spectacle turned out to be a miserable. In attempts, the innocence of observing, and the location of the first person does not lose more eccal, bakal and mumbled, which answered direct questions of the ruthless, as never before, Dudya, who called the guest a “gentle propagandist” and extremely this definition of a vulnerable.

Judging by the interview, Kolesnikov both in Putin and in the current structure of the state, almost everything suits. Well, Vladimir Vladimirovich has (he, without noticing it, calls Putin exclusively by name-patronymic) his weaknesses: he loves to play hockey, even if it is “gangling”, sometimes diving for amphoras, but how not to dive, if someone carefully laid the bottom, wanting to give the president pleasure. But the main thing is that living people over the past 20 years under Putin has become better. Dud is amazed: “Do you really think so? Are you in other cities? " Kolesnikov, of course, happens. Together with Putin. Therefore, he sees life exclusively from the window of the bus transporting journalists of the presidential pool. And from this window, life looks much better than it was before. And "in my native Semobratov, the Yaroslavl region, it has become much better, I tell you exactly."
On the website of the TASS news agency, a large -scale project “20 questions to Vladimir Putin” started - exactly the number of years that he is in power. The famous interviewer Andrei Vandenko recorded 3.5 hours a video with the president, dividing them into 20 short series, which will be posted on the digital platforms of the agency 3-4 per week, until March 26. Announced topics - from the resignation of the government and changes in the Constitution to the affairs of Golunov, Serebrennikov, summer protests in Moscow and personal losses. The situation is informal. The interlocutor for Putin is new and, in contrast to Solovyov and Mikhalkov, who are in the loyal Rage, is not similar to a flatterer and a lysolee, although the president is not used to acute and unwinded issues and not a fact that it will be frank. It is amazing that this multi -part interview is not intended for a traditional TV. The first series has already been posted. "How are you doing?" - asks at the very beginning Vandenko. "Honestly?" - Putin responds. “Honestly,” the journalist confirms. "Very good!" -the president answers with a satisfied smile ... But the men do not know.