Khuls of meaning

Why Maria Zakharova abandoned the debate with Alexei Navalny

Nothing is valued in the era of coronavirus as public scandals. The abundance of infected, reports from the fronts, calculation of beds, production on an industrial scale of prohibitions and threats causes moderate interest of the consumer. But it is worth opening the eyes of Zuleikha on his own life; Sobchak - on crabs; Todorenko - on family violence; Utkin - on Solovyov, how the coveted hype flares up.

A special place in the husk of a modern context belongs to the mysterious non -insurer of Maria Zakharova with Alexei Navalny. The plot unfolds right now, before our eyes, and worthy of a separate description. Zakharova gave an interview to Mikhail Zygarya. Navalny found that the representative of the Foreign Ministry, which promotes class inequality, would disgrace both the country and the Foreign Ministry. Zakharova called Navalny a “coward” and offered him a direct conversation. The latter agreed to the conversation, although he did not deny himself the pleasure of christening the lady with an “information service staff”.

In the first round, these high relations ended with an agreement on the debate. The moderators called Alexei Pivovarov. In less than a day, the second round struck. Zakharova started, was offended by the format, the machinations of Navalny, and refused her own venture herself.

Why is this story interesting? Only one - total reversing of meaning.

The limited space of the place provokes the limited thought. What exactly wanted to say Zakharov in an interview with Zygarya? What did Zygar want to ask the representative of the Foreign Ministry? How did Navalny from a viscous empty dialogue attended Maria's contempt for the common people? None of the fatal triangle gave himself the work to prepare for a conversation. The venerable scourge looked like a newcomer in the interview genre. The multi -experienced Zakharova got lost in the abundance of subordinate clauses. The only thing that was possible was to show an example of “vulgar government materialism”, which the poet Tyutchev once wrote about her colleague in the workshop. Passionar Navalny habitually exposed representatives of the bloody regime.

So, the dialogue of the authorities with the opposition did not happen again. Either Sergey Lavrov forbade Zakharova’s communication with the “marginal”, then she herself came to her senses, changed her mind. The reasons, by and large, are not so important. The Russian government is monologue by definition, free, carried in the AP Dialogue does not suit it. Nevertheless, the story came out instructive. The image of the status leader of the Midovsky Department will remain in our hearts for a long time. The complete absence of logic in words and actions, hysteria on the air of the Echo of Moscow, a convulsive attempt to at least somehow hold a rapidly disappearing face-all this is impressive.

It is one thing to regularly shine at Solovyov, who, with delight, is ready to kiss her in the shoulder, and a completely different thing is to communicate with Navalny, who certainly is not ready for adoration. The thirst for Hyp this time failed Zakharov. In a normal country, after such incidents, it is customary to resign. But he will not leave, he will continue to cheat, dance “Kalinka”, write songs for Valeria. Nothing threatens her career, including Chubais's reasonable proposal. He has long been saying that it is time to change Zakharov for Buzova - both are singing, dancing, composing, only Olga, unlike Mary, are millions of fans.

Small time takes the interstitial people to the forefront. Information noise becomes the form of the existence of protein matter. This scandal has not yet ended, but the path has already been cleared for the next. Norkin with his enlightened studios enthusiastically discusses Alexei Venediktov, who grabbed the knees of the girls a hundred years ago. The Russian BBC service published a large (excellent) article about it. The authors devoted several lines to the “knees”, but this is more than enough for courageous commentators. Life continues.