
In Karelia, more than 20 local residents filed a lawsuit against the governor Arthur Parfenchikov due to the introduction of the self-isolation regime. The plaintiffs believe that the head of the region by his decree could violate the right to freedom of movement and labor. This was written by the site "7x7" with reference to one of the applicants - lawyer Anastasia Anushin.
According to her, Parfenchikov, by his decree, “actually introduced a state of emergency on the territory of the Republic of Karelia” and thereby “deprived an indefinite circle of persons, including administrative so -sauters, the right to freedom of movement and the right to work guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.”
The plaintiffs are sure that Parfenchikov had no authority to introduce prohibitions. Only the president has such a right and only in the case of emergency regime in the country.
Wed VKontakte Wed in classmates Wed on TwitterAt the end of April in St. Petersburg, local residents filed a similar lawsuit against the regional government. One of the applicants, lawyer Maxim Olenichev told the correspondent of the Sever. Real website that the government cannot limit citizens, despite the need to introduce prohibitions.
- With the threat of emergencies, the authorities have no duties to support either business or citizens. Those social payments that the government provides are simply their initiative, but citizens do not have any way to demand compensation for losses, because many people have lost their jobs, the business incurred losses and some companies are generally closing, ”said Olenichev earlier.
In the Russian regions, due to Pandemia of Coronavirus, a regime of increased readiness was introduced. In some cities, the self -isolation mode is introduced, which is required for people over 65 years old. The emergency regime in the north-west was introduced in the village in the Murmansk region due to a large number of coronavirus