
Three years ago, they decided to remove their land for the construction of the Tavrida highway - a four -lane megaproject, which should connect Kerch with Sevastopol. In return, they offered a funny amount - 2.4 million rubles. For that kind of money in the Crimea, the Ablaevs note, you can only buy a collapse without gas, water and with a toilet on the street. The family tried to fight, but in the end she was with nothing.
“It all started three years ago,” recalls Nadia Ablaev. - People came to our yard, said that the road would pass here.
Ablaev in exchange for their house and the site offered an apartment in Feodosia.
“We arrived, and there are bare walls: not finishing, nothing,” Nadia continues. - The house is built of backing materials. We came to watch the apartment, and there are other residents. They thought that we were a commission, began to complain about the poor quality of apartments, that the communications were not connected ...
In 2017, in Feodosia, a scandal surfaced around the houses from emergency housing really flared up. The company KRECH-15, owned by the famous developer to Roman Lukichev, managed not only to save, using the former building materials, but also to sell the apartments twice-the federal budget and shareholders.
As a result, immigrants, who received the keys from the hands of the head of the Ministry of Construction of the Russian Federation, were surprised to learn that someone else would live in their apartments.
Ablaevs refused the apartment in a scandalous house.
“Then we were told to find the house for a replacement,” Nadia continues. - We found here, in greeting. The hostess asked for a house with a plot less than our 3.5 million rubles.

Representatives of the VAD ( Contractor of the construction of the Tavrida highway . - Auth. ) They said that they did not have that kind of money. We traveled around the surrounding villages - everywhere they ask for 2.6-2.8 million rubles for conditions worse than ours. We have gas, water in the house, and there is only a stove on wood and a well on the street. We do not need the coast, we want to live right there, in the steppe Crimea.
The Ablaev house was once also without amenities. It was bought by relatives of the server upon returning from Central Asia, where his parents, the Crimean Tatars, were exiled in 1944. Nadia is also from the family of deported, born and raised in Kazakhstan, in her native to her parents Crimea was able to return only in 1989.
“I worked in watch in a catering in Feodosia, my husband all my life on earnings throughout the Crimea,” the woman says. - They collected a penny, carried out gas in installments, water into the house. The restroom is, however, on the street, but we had already flooded the foundation, we wanted to attach the bathhouse, a warm bathroom.
The woman lists in detail plans to arrange the house, not having time to realize that she is no longer destined to return to it. And also - unconsciously justifies those who appreciated him so cheaply.
“We have a house, though self -fraudulent, but strong,” she says. - Walls - half a meter. We were going to change the windows to the plastic ones. And then the construction began, the heavy cars drove, the piles beat - the roof cracked.
The Ablaevs refused the compensation proposed by him, and then their plot was seized forcibly. But not all, but 22.5 acres of 24.
“When they made a land -road to the highway,” says lawyer Daniil Sobol, who represented a family in the courts, “land builders in a hurry held the border right around the house: one half - on the site for removal, the other - no. Everyone who saw these documents later was surprised how it happened.
The Ablaevs were hooked for this incident: they filed a lawsuit with a claim to be illegal, because under local legislation, a plot for individual household cannot be less than 8 acres. But all that they managed to achieve is another claim for the seizure of the remaining one and a half hundred parts.
During the consideration of the second case, the lawyer petitioned for the appointment of an independent assessment of the house and the land. The judge of the Kirovsky district court, Degtyarev agreed, and even appointed experts from the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Simferopol. Experts estimated 1.5 acres of land with a house of 1.9 million rubles. What amount would come out with the remaining 22.5 acres is not important: the court suddenly refused to introduce the ordered examination to them.
“The judge said so: the representative of the plaintiff, the service of the Roads of Crimea, believes that the site costs 65 thousand rubles, and I agree with his opinion,” says Daniil Sobol.

According to the USRN, the cadastral value of the land seized from the Ablaia lands is just above 100 thousand rubles.
In the same village, the state estimates plots of similar area at 1.3–1.7 million rubles.
On May 14, the bailiffs, despite the regime of self-isolation, introduced in the Crimea due to coronavirus, evicted the Ablaevs from the house. To nowhere. Just outside.
“We arrived and ordered to go out,” says Nadia. - And we have nowhere to go. I tell them, and they: "Though you put it up in front of the house and leave it, we do not care." The door was closed, red ribbon was hanged and left. My bookcase is still on the street. Okay, there is no rain.
Nadia and the server temporarily moved to the neighbors, and the simple belongings were taken to the site to relatives.
Crimean officials have long transferred the money due to the family to the notary.
“There is such a mechanism: if a person does not want or cannot take the debt, it can be transferred to notarial storage so that there are no lawsuits about the illegal use of funds,” Daniil Sobol explains. - Money from such an account can be taken within 10 years.
On the day of eviction, the Ablaevs tried to pick up their funds, but due to the coronavirus epidemic, the notary had a shorter working day, and it was not possible to meet with him.
“I'm afraid even if we take this money, because of quarantine we will not be able to buy a house right away,” the hostess says. - Everything is closed.
While the Ablaevs house stands in its place, but soon the builders of the Taurids will make an embankment in its place and put an even, neat lawn.
And the server and Nadia will continue to defend their rights - this time in the European Court of Human Rights. Their lawsuit has already been adopted, but so far, like other cases from Crimea, has not been considered.
The New Gazeta turned to the press service of the general contractor of the Tavrida highway, the WAD company, with a request to comment on the situation with the eviction of the Ablaev family. However, the WAD explained that the customer was dealing with issues of property relations - the Crimean road service.
It was obliged to provide land for the construction of the road, he was engaged in the payment of compensation. The correspondent of Novaya was not able to get through to the service of roads.
The editorial office sent a request to the organization. We asked to explain who and according to what criteria evaluated the house and land of the Ablaevs, and whether it was possible to provide them with another housing. We will publish the answer upon receipt.
The server and Nadia continue to live with friends.
PS
Updated. Commentary of the Road Service Crimea
“In view of the refusal gr. Ablaev’s server Osmanovich (hereinafter referred to as S.O. Ablaev) in signing an agreement on the seizure of real estate for state needs, on 06/26/2018 the institution filed a lawsuit against the latter, for the forced seizure for the needs of the Russian Federation by terminating property rights to real estate objects, namely: a land plot of 2250 square meters and a residential building - 64.6 square meters. <...>
Ablaev S.O. He filed a counterclaim against the institution on invalidating the division of the land <...> and establishing the amount of redemption value.By the decision of the Kirovsky District Court of November 1, 2019 No. 2-586/2019, the institution’s claims were satisfied, in the oncoming claims of the S.O. It was refused.
The appeal definition of the above decision was left unchanged.
10.03.2020 by the decision of the Kirovsky District Court of the Republic of Crimea, the claims of the Ministry of Property and Land Relations of the Republic of Crimea to Ablaev S.O., namely: namely: namely:
1) on the demand from someone else's illegal possession of real estate: a land plot 2250 sq.m., a building with an area of 64.6 square meters. m, located along the street of the Golden Key, 15 in s. Greeted Kirov district of the Republic of Crimea;
2) eviction without the provision of another dwelling of ABLAEV S.O.
3) the obligation of Ablaeva S.O. Within one month from the date of the decision to release the land and residential building.The decision of the Kirovsky District Court of the Republic of Crimea entered into force on 04/15/2020.
It is worth noting that Ablaev S.O. He did not take advantage of his right to appeals the above decision of the Kirovsky District Court of the Republic of Crimea, thereby agreed with his decision.
Ekaterina Reznikova , especially for "New"