"He made a scandal that led to the accumulation of citizens." What is written in the protocol of David Frenkel, who was broken by a hand on the polling station

Mediazon gives excerpts from the police protocol drawn up against the correspondent of David Frenkel after the police officer Denis Dmitriev broke his hand in the polling station in St. Petersburg. Doctors found in Frenkel a closed fracture of the middle third of the right shoulder bone with a displacement of fragments; The Investigative Committee began a preliminary investigation on the day of the attack, but the results have not yet been reported. After the start of the audit, employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs drew up three protocols on administrative offenses on Frenkel at once.

Disobedience to the order of a police officer

Part 1 of Article 19.3 Code of Administrative Offenses.

June 30, 2020 at 15 hours 00 minutes at the address: the city of St. Petersburg, the embankment of the Fontanka River, house 22 citizen Frenkel David Aleksandrovich, who is an accredited representative of the media in the manner established by the Russian CEC, <...> carried out the election commission of the PEC No. 2191 of the powers established by the election legislation, which resulted in violation of the established legislation on the legislation of about The election of the procedure for the work of the election commission No. 2191 and the interference of the participants in the all -Russian vote on the issue of approval of the changes to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, while the actions of a citizen Frenkel did not contain a criminal act.

While in the PEC No. 2191, Frenkel provoked a conflict situation in an incorrect defiant form, demanded an answer from the observers present to their knowledge of regulatory acts on all-Russian voting on the approval of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, was loudly indignant at the need to register in the registration journal, <...> carried out a video in the voting room at the place, intended to fill out the ballots, as well as at the place of work of the commission with other documents, which posed a threat of maintaining the confidentiality of the personal data that they contained.

Thus, by his actions, citizen Frenkel D. A. made a scandal, which led to the accumulation of citizens in the PEC No. 2191, which led to a violation of the social distance between citizens, as well as interference to the participation of voters in voting, since the access of participants to the place of issuance of the ballots was difficult.

The chairman of the PEC V. Yu. Landyshko <...> have repeatedly made comments on the inadmissibility of interference in the election commission of powers, <...> which Frenkel D. A. ignored and continued to intervene in the Election Election No. 2191 powers.

Upon trying <...> to deliver a citizen of Frenkel D.A. from the polling station No. 2191 to the 78th department of the police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Central District of St. Petersburg, citizen Frenkel also prevented the performance of the police officer to protect public order and ensure public security, namely, he refused to leave the premises of the PEC No. 2191, and hesitated with his feet, grabbed the walls, resisted, repelled the police officers.

The protocol on interfering in the work of the election commission (Article 5.69 of the Code of Administrative Offenses) literally repeats the protocol on disobedience to the order of a police officer. Also, a protocol was drawn up on Frenkel under part 1 of Article 20.6.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses on violation of the rules of conduct in an “high readiness regime”.