Children - weapons of the last day

What is the difference between Yanukovych and Lukashenko

First. The elections in reality were won by Tikhanovskaya.

She won the dry, with a crushing score, judging by the protocols of those weekends where the elections were not falsified or falsified. PEC Minsk 21 - 71.99%, Minsk 37 - 70, 96%, Minsk 70 - 79.54%, Minsk 10 - 65, 25%, etc.

Second. After that, Lukashenko declared himself the winner, the CEC was told that it was 80%for Lukashenko. Thousands of people who went out into the streets were severely beaten, and the dictator dared to say that these, beaten, ruined people with a holiday. And in general-they were drug addicts, and the “sheep” (that is, its competitors) were controlled from abroad.

After that, Tikhanovskaya spent 7 hours (or so) either in the CEC, or where else, came out of there pale, did not say anything intelligible, and the employees of the Belarusian KGB took her to the border with Lithuania. There, in Lithuania, with shaking lips, she recorded an appeal that she could not do otherwise and that the life and health of children above all.

“Many will understand me, many will condemn me, many will hate me,” said Tikhanovskaya. “But you know, God forbid to come across the choice that I faced.” Therefore, people, take care of yourself, please. Not a single life is worth what is happening now. I ... children are the most important thing in our life. ”

This appeal must be seen. Instead of a proud, self -confident woman, a crushed man was a crushed person in front of us, who looked death into his eyes. The only explanation that I have - Tikhanovskaya threatened to take her children.

Everyone laughed that Lukashenko allowed a housewife with two children to the election, without money, without structure, without a party, without a circle of like -minded people, but she outplayed him. Then they laughed at the patriarchal and masculine stereotypes of the Belarusian dictator.

And he had a weapon of the last day against a housewife with children. The last day came - he pressed the button.

“I thought that all this campaign hardened me very much ...” said Tikhanovskaya, “but I remained that weak woman, which was originally.”

Those watches, the countdown of which began after voting, are the most important. And a significant part of this time, Tikhanovskaya spent the employees of the Belarusian KGB in the company.

She did not go to the people who voted for her, and ended up in Lithuania.

Lukashenko remained the president so far.

Let us ask ourselves the question: what would happen if the dictator refused to recognize the results of the elections, and the case happened in some southern hot country, unemployed youth is full, there was nothing to eat, there would be an absolute poverty, and the dictator’s opponents would be a party of fanatics, striving to build a caliphate or communism?

The answer is clear. That same evening, the capital would be blocked by the barricades.

No riot police would stand it, especially since the militants would have been created for a long time, and no secret police could have controled them, as the Iranian Shah police could not control, unfortunately, with supporters of Khomeini.

The revolution would immediately defeat, but the problem would be that the regime that came to power as a result of such a revolution would be much worse than the regime of a secular dictator - including from the point of view of terror, both physical and ideological.

Lukashenko taught everyone a simple lesson. If a dictator in a modern society with a debugged punitive machine is ready for anything to maintain power, and if its car obeys, then this is enough against those who are for the bourgeois human freedom.

Voter support - spit. Support for civilized countries - spit. All that is needed is iron eggs, a copper forehead and riot police. True, there was a chance that riot police would throw shields if hundreds of thousands go out the streets. But-again, for now-alas.

Yanukovych began to shoot at the people, but riot police were frightened and stopped obeying, especially when people began to shoot in response. Lukashenko did not make such a mistake.

And Putin will not.

Oh, something tells me that in the next election the result of Putin will differ a little from the result of Lukashenko.
In all, alas, meanings.