
On July's twenty -fifth in the village of Sivovo in the Pskov region, Galina Paskevich’s home dog, nicknamed Pyt, killed a neighbor passing by the site. The shock of sharpening in the open mouth of the dog.
Evidence of an eyewitness
Galina
- I heard the barking of my dogs. I went out onto the porch of the house. I saw Sergey Viktorovich Tereshchenkov passing by my fence, who was nicknamed the village in the village, he is a fisherman and an alcoholic. I greeted him. The float called my dog: "Come here!"
The PIF knew him and trusted him, ran to the fence, not suspecting anything. I thought the float wanted to treat him, and asked the dog to not give anything.
To which he replied: "Necessary, Galya!" And he hit the sharpening in the open mouth of my dog.
Sharpowing interrupted the pifu artery. Twenty -five minutes the dog fought in agony. The PIF died of blood loss, the heart stopped. This was confirmed by the veterinarian, who later conducted the examination. The neighbors came running to the cries of Galina, they said that Tereshchenkov walked around the village and boasted that he had stabbed the dog and would be so with everyone.
The arrived police detained him. He explained his act by hatred for Galina and her dogs, and killed the pey, because he believes that he was biting his cat. On the basis of this explanation, the district authorized person of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation “Nevelsky” Semenkov Alexei Alexandrovich refused to initiate a criminal case. Since he did not find a crime under Article 245 of the Criminal Code (cruelty to the animal that entailed his death or injury, committed in order to cause an animal pain or suffering) and also did not find hooligan actions provided for in the 213rd Article of the Criminal Code.
That is, the murder was committed out of a sense of revenge Galina Paskevich, and not out of the desire to cause suffering from an animal, so it is not a cruel circulation.
In a private conversation with Galina, the precinct Semenkov A.A. He gave a more believable explanation: “In excitement or refusal of excitement, investigators consult with the local prosecutor's office. If the prosecutor’s office says to initiate the case, then we are initiating, and if he says not to be initiated, then we refuse. ”
On August sixth, Galina filed a complaint with the very nevelsky inter -district prosecutor's office. The complaint was returned, the consideration took less than a day, there was no corpus delicti, there was no cruel appeal. Deputy Prosecutor Vera Vitalievna Zhuravleva is known to the zoostaters of the Pskov region with his cynical and cruel attitude to animals. She regularly refuses to check on complaints about cruelty against animals,
And he considers the shooting of homeless dogs in the region a "hygienic act."
The New Gazeta sent a request to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation "Nevelsky" and the Nevelsky Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office in order to clarify the grounds for refusing to institute criminal proceedings. She also turned to the Pskov Regional Prosecutor's Office with a request to check the legitimacy of the actions of the district Semenkov A.A. and deputy prosecutor Zhuravleva V.V. At the time of publication of the text, we did not receive answers to requests.