Any amendments at your expense

As a result of the "constitutional reform" Dmitry Anatolyevich was allowed to perform small thefts

The parliament by the Stakhanov pace adopts laws that implement amendments to the Constitution. But not at all the amendments that were repeated as extremely important for citizens and with the adoption of which we will immediately heal better. I do not remember a single poster where it would be written "Putin until 2036!" Or "Putin and Medvedev - inviolability forever!" Or "International courts are not a decree!" Or "Government - tin soldiers of the president!" Or "let the president dismiss judges!"

But this is exactly what is being implemented now.

Visually proving what I wrote about back in January-February: it was the strengthening of the president’s power and its extension that was the main thing for Putin.

And everything else was a smoke veil.

And besides, mostly useless: either long ago and so recorded in the laws, or meaningless from a legal point of view.

Remember that you were advertised from each TV and showed on posters on each pillar?

"Annual indexation of pensions!" "Caring for a man of labor!" "The minimum wage is not lower than the subsistence minimum!" "Available and high -quality medicine!" "Protection of motherhood and childhood!" “Preservation of cultural heritage!” ...

And where are the laws that implement these amendments now?

On raising pensions and minimum wage, on increasing the availability of medical care, protecting cultural heritage and supporting science?

There are no them. Instead, laws are exclusively about power. And if about a person of labor, then only about one. Maximum about two.

What have already managed to accept or introduce in the "power" area?

• They changed the law on the Constitutional Court - they reduced the number of judges, gave the president the right to represent judges to guaranteed dismissal (through the obviously obedient council of the Federation), forbade judges to publish and even mention their special opinion.

• They changed the law on the government-they gave the State Duma the right to coordinate deputy prime ministers and ministers, and the president-without any approvals to appoint and remove the “military-diplomatic” block of the government and dismiss the prime minister and members of the government at any time.

• They changed the law on the prosecutor's office - they deprived the regions of the right to coordinate the candidates of prosecutors.

• Allowed not to execute those decisions of international courts that I really do not want.

• They created the State Council to add the "best people of the city."

• They offered to plant five years for a retreat from the current version of the highly approved history of the country.

• They endowed the former presidents of lifelong immunity (and not only during his stay).

• As for “social” amendments, once again “froze” funded pensions and refused to index pensions to working pensioners.

Fifting pensions are part of a future pension, which expenses 6% of citizens' salaries younger than 1967. This part can be sent to non -state pension funds for “investment” and increased.

When the accumulative system was introduced, a lot and ardently told how everyone can become - with the help of the funded system - "a blacksmith of their pension happiness." But for six years now - "freezing." To shut up holes in the budget of the Pension Fund caused by the “Crimean history”, sanctions and the economic crisis. Hundreds of thousands of rubles over the years did not fall into “cumulative” accounts (from where, inter alia, the future pension will be paid) of every Russian citizen.

At the same time, it is the accumulative pension - which is “frozen” - can be inherited after the death of the pensioner, unlike the insurance part of the pension (formed by the insurance benefits of the pensioner), which is not inherited.

And the question is quite reasonable: why do a citizen go to the heirs, and is the state taken by the state deductions?

To index pensions to working pensioners refused under the pretext that they already receive money, and this is unfair. Demagogy: a pension is not a social benefit, but a payment for last work. Which is also paid from the previously paid money by the pensioner himself.

But didn’t they promise us the annual indexation of pensions to the Constitution? They promised. But I immediately warned that it was a deception.

And that's why.

What is now recorded in the Constitution? “Pensions are indexed at least once a year in the manner prescribed by federal law.”

Keywords here are “in the manner prescribed by federal law”.

And such a law has long existed. Federal Law "On Labor Pensions in the Russian Federation". And it even says about annual indexation. But you know how it is written?

And so that (article 17) the indexation coefficient (that is, how much the pension grows) the government determines.

Based on the "level of price growth for the corresponding period."
But “based on the level of price growth,” does not mean “no less than the level of price growth”.

That is, the government is not obliged to index pensions at the same speed as prices are rising.

It can establish the indexation coefficient zero, and this will not formally contradict either the law or the constitution.

“Yabloko”, I note, in its alternative amendments to the Constitution proposed to establish the obligation to index pensions not lower than the inflation level. But these amendments, made to all seven regional parliaments, where there are deputies from Yabloko, were refused to support United Russia.

So no increase in pensions from the adoption of Putin's amendments to the constitution should not.

No matter how much the Kremlin propagandists sang in the ears about this.

Finally, the last.

As already mentioned, the law (authors are the notorious senator Klishas and deputy Krasheninnikov), who implements a constitutional amendment on the lifetime immunity of the ex-president (not about infallibility), has been introduced into the State Duma.

Theoretically, this inviolability can be deprived of it - but exactly according to the same technology as the current president.

Namely: if the State Duma has a charges against him of “state treason or committing a different serious crime”, the Supreme Court will confirm the presence of signs of a crime in his actions, and the Constitutional Court will give a conclusion on compliance with the established procedure for the prosecution.

At the same time, at least two -thirds of the State Duma or senators, respectively, should vote for the extension of the charges (and for deprivation of immunity).

Probably, a doctor of political science is not required to assess the likelihood of such a development of events in today's constitutional structure as an infinitely small value.

But for this, which is noteworthy, the ex-president should be accused of committing a state reception house or other serious crime. That is, for which you can get from 5 years in prison.

The crimes of medium and minor gravity (with the term of punishment up to 5 years in prison), the ex-president can commit completely impunity at least every day and will be unreasonable.

The list of such crimes is very vast: it will be possible, not afraid of anything, not only a trifle in pockets to rub.

Here, the manufacture, storage and sale of drugs, and the abduction of a person, and rape, and the intentional infliction of injury to another person, and the organization of prostitution classes, and the spread of fake information, and the use of violence against a representative of the authorities, and the threat of murder, and falsification of voting, and fraud, and the assignment or embezzlement, and “laundering” of money received by criminal by means of public calls for extremist activity or to violate the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, and public calls to unleash an aggressive war and rehabilitation of Nazism ...

Recall, by the way, if anyone forgot that one ex-president, who is currently spreading, is already extending in Russia: this is Dmitry Medvedev.

And all of the above he can afford without fear.

However, one thing calms: when the country will change in the country, all these guarantees of immunity will immediately turn into cutting paper.

Because yet no former president he wanted to plant helped the laws that he, in power, secured guarantees.