
On the eve of the birthday of Mikhail Efremov on November 10, power made him a gift. I sent from the Moscow pre-trial detention center “Water”, where he wanted to stay, to Belgorod.
However, he himself assumed it. And preparing.
At this time, we corresponded with him.
That is, they used the Electronic Service of the FSIN. Which works as a Swiss watch.
I wrote:
Dear Mikhail Olegovich!
The editors of Novaya Gazeta asks you to discuss your current situation in the context of Russian literature - from “Notes from the Dead House” to Kolyma Stories Shalamov, from Dostoevsky to Andrei Platonov. Does this abstract experience help in prison?
And also we have a few simple questions.
What helps to hold on?
Do you remember any texts?
Are there any creative plans for the near future?
How do you see the future?
And in general - how does it live?Your friends and well -wishers, but they can’t count them in the wild, want to know about you not from the yellow press, but from reliable sources.
Strength to you and health.
The system answered.
Hello!
You created a letter No. 7018911. In order to be delivered to the SIZO-5 Vodnik, you need to pay 110 rubles. ... unpaid letters are not delivered.
Further, how to do it. And in red: “Upon receipt of payment, the letter will be automatically redirected by the censor of the institution of the SIZO-5 Vodnik. You will receive a message by e-mail indicating the status of your letter-delivered, did not go to censorship, departed, not listed, released, delayed with delivery.
If you ordered the answer, the answer will be received by your e-mail in the form of a scanned copy of the manuscript letter of your addressee A4 on one side.
The parameters of your letter:
Institution of pre-trial detention center-5 "Vodnik"
Letter number 7018911
Created on October 30, 2020
Recipient: Efremov Mikhail Olegovich 1963
Sender: Tokareva Marina
Signs 645
"The response to the letter" was ordered "
I quickly received the answer. First again from the system.
Letter 7018911 received the censors of the institution of the SIZO-5 Vodnik for processing on October 30, 2020
The check can take up to 3 (three) business days. Censors' letters are delivered only on business days.
Expect notifications of the status of a letter from the censors of the institution.
Letters statuses:
-Setd by the addressee,
-The censorship did not pass,
-Adrestat is not listed for this institution,
-Adrestis left for another institution,
-Adrestat is released.Attention (green font) when using the FSIN card, your letter will be sent to the censors for verification automatically and immediately without the participation of the operator. With regular correspondence, the card significantly accelerates the process of correspondence delivery.
The card can be ordered by the link here.
I ordered the card. The rumors of vague and muddy came to the wild from behind the grate. Either the feasts in the cell, then the prisoners from the household block is allegedly against the fact that Efremov is left in the “vodnik” - as if the tasks are difficult, he will not cope, they will have to work for him.
My correspondence with the system continued. She, the system, was polite in the third phase of the passage of my text. And even, I would say, teaching.
The administration of the Institution of the SIZO-5 Vodnik informs you that the letter 7018911 passed the censorship and was awarded to the addressee on October 31, 2020. If you ordered an answer, then expect it to enter your e-mail.
Mikhail Olegovich answered quickly. And the Federal Penitentiary Service again flashed with good manners:
Hello!
The administration of the Institution of the SIZO-5 Vodnik informs you that an answer has been received to the letter. The letter is in the appendix to this e-mail in .jpeg format
The processing of the letter is completed.
Thank you
I will not quote literally. Because immediately after the phrase “Thank you for writing”, Efremov asks not to publish his answer entirely. He says that he will answer my questions in the next letter, but for this you need to write again to be given a leaflet again to answer.
Because in the camera it is like this: one letter is one piece of paper. With a letter number, kuar code, the names of the sender and recipient, and the line “answer only on one side”.
By that time, about Efremov and his “new life” what garbage was not applied on the network and on the screens. Haters, Haipozhors, liar pissing against the background of a prisoner in a pre -trial detention center as soon as they could and as they were given. They knew that they would not allow anyone to publicly protect.
That is why from everything that Mikhail Olegovich writes in the first letter, three of his own evidence seem significant.
The first - he did not order any goose with apples into the camera.
The second is that the other s/c against his work in the “vodnik” is a lie.
Third and most importantly, he is going to make a Russian prison theater in the local club.
In response on November 1, I, in particular, wrote:
Mikhail Olegovich, understand: people are important for people first -hand (mouth), that is, your own words, and not interpretations with a yellow tint. What is actually happening with a large Russian artist in the current circumstances of time and place. Moreover, such a grandiose story as a Russian prison theater has been conceived - more about this.
The system, slightly slowed down, responded, knowing that the letter 7025794 passed censorship and was awarded to the addressee on November 4, 2020 and recalling: “The response time is completely dependent on your addressee. The answer may not pass censorship. ”
Mikhail Efremov’s answer was censored. Here he is.
Dear Marina!
I am still in full condition. The verdict of the court of appeal cannot reach a pre -trial detention center. And I do not know where I will serve his sentence. Maybe in the SIZO-5 hotal detachment, closer to the club, or maybe they are transferred somewhere in Belgorod (where Kokorin and Mamaev were sitting). And there I will have to get acquainted with the authorities again and convince him of the humanity of the idea of the Russian prison Theater. One of the members of the PMC Melnikov is my ally in the creation of such a theater and as he says, writes a petition to the FSIN. As they decide, it will be so. Well, the “Big Russian Artist” (this, of course, wrote a definition, awkwardly even) read the book “Milkman” by Anna Burns, laureate of Boker, the book “Librarian” (also a booker, but Russian) and the book of Alexei Fedyarov “The Sitting Man”. Between reading these books for the rest of the head, Pikul and Stephen King are well going on. But in general, I have not yet developed some kind of reading system. That's when I understand where I will sit, then I will do it. What else? Even earlier, one -act plays, the characters of the men (women are here to play the western). With respect. EFR.

This letter came the day before sending to a correctional colony. In our clanging iron correspondence with the captive of the Federal Service for the Penetration Service, the poorly distinguishable the quiet voice of human suffering. In the current hem of the media reality, Efremov is still an info-breeder, target, the one on whom one instruction is valid is to crucify. But in life, even so tragically changed, he remains a great artist.
Now Mikhail Efremov is already on quarantine in the Belgorod pre -trial detention center.
In the Belgorod region, from five colonies, only IK-4 in the city of Alekseevka is intended for the first convicted men. In his case, for 7.5 years. The same where the players "served". It has a thousand people. There is a club and the auditorium. For parole, you will have to master the prison profession. For some reason, I think: he will choose to bake bread.
We were not really familiar with him. Critical assessments when his actor “Contemporary” sometimes disappointed, if not offended. But - like many people of circles, environment and hinterlands - I sympathize with him with all my heart. And I hope he will get a Russian prison theater, and a reading system, and to save himself.
He wants, he will write more. The answer completely depends on our addressee.