Whose executioner is it heard?

Among the "Renchers of Katyn" appeared a Russian state body

In May 2020, activists of the Tver Nod and the leadership of the Tver Medical University, located in the building of the former regional NKVD, dismantled two memorial boards from its walls - in memory of the Soviet victims of the Stalinist terror and in memory of its Polish victims. The New Gazeta wrote several times about vandalism in Tver, but the region’s leadership was completely cold and never even responded to them.

The Memorial challenged this arbitrariness in court, the process is not yet completed.

But in one of the documents of the administration of the Tver region “Katynsky execution”, as well as executions in Tver (Kalinin) and Kharkov executioners from the NKVD, was certified as “supposedly held”, despite the fact that Russia, as you know, has long recognized the responsibility of the USSR for this crime and repeatedly apologized to the Poles. But the official Russian stateganese first joined the “Katyn denial” - a small but passionate group of vocal people, eagerly “exposing” the Soviet mark in this tragedy and growing a German trace. From a historical point of view, all of their “argumentation” is thoroughly dismantled and refuted, including hits such as “The tokens of the Kuligovsky and Malovean” or “Beria’s writing machines”.

But all God's dew begs. And the events of recent months manifest a completely new quality. On November 16–18, under the auspices of the Russian Military Historical Society, the negators gathered for the between the landscape in Ostashkov (they conceived the Nilo-Great Deserts on the territory of the male monastery, but the monks were not allowed to themselves).

The official website of the RVIO said that “with the goal of an objective and comprehensive discussion of this topic, professional historians, political scientists, public and political figures from Moscow, St. Petersburg, Tver, Smolensk, and Volgograd were invited to participate in the conference. According to the video, Professor Grover Ferr (USA) and Malgozhaat Kulbachevskaya-Figat (Polish Republic) spoke in front of the conference participants. Among the participants, the State Duma deputy Alexei Chepa was noted-the one that proposed to transfer the UN out of New York and legally prohibit the Russians to participate in the draws of American Green Cart.

It was not called the between the landscape: “A scientific and practical conference on the topic of Russian-Polish relations, in particular, complex issues of history, including the issue of the fate of the Polish prisoners of war contained in 1939–1941. In Soviet camps. "

From the press release of the RVIO
“The conference participants note that the politicized and tendential approach to the coverage of the so -called Katyn case over the decades does not meet the principles of objectivity and historicism. This approach should be considered as one of the areas of the general information and propaganda campaign to entrust the USSR for the emergence and unleashing of the Second World War.

Unreasonable political assessments issued on behalf of the leaders of our country in the 1989-1990s, and the statement of the State Duma of the FS of the Russian Federation of November 26, 2010 still remain a factor holding back an impartial scientific study of the events of 1939-1941, including issues about the fate of Polish citizens in the Soviet Union. ”

That is, it is proposed to disavow the entire Katyn historiography, like the Katyn history, and to return not even in 1989, but in 1946 and re-play Katyn, exceeding it to the Germans, which failed in the Nuremberg process!

TPRR, arrived! ..

The “basic” participants in this conference publish their “work” for years, from the book to the book, rewriting what for some reason they consider “facts”, respectfully referring to each other. They are refuted, documents are given, no one, except for this company, does not cause doubts - including those signed by Stalin, Beria, members of the Politburo, who have been stored in the “special folders” of secret party archives for decades. Tom has been published in which executed Poles and their executioners are called namely. The investigation was carried out by the main military prosecutor’s office, (then still alive) witnesses were interviewed. There are video recordings of interrogations, say, the former head of the Kalinin Directorate of the NKVD Tokarev and dozens of his cipherograms sent from the scene of executions: “Fulfilled 293 ...”, “Fulfilled 164 ...”

In the early 2000s, the case was closed-"in connection with the death of the perpetrators." Some of the documents were transferred to Poland, some remained classified.

Why will the “neglects” not get acquainted with at least “open” pages of this case?

There, perhaps, they would find an explanation of who and why for decades in offices on the Old Square (in their opinion) secretly engaged in meaningless falsification of hundreds of documents in the calculation that after half a century it would be possible to denigrate the holy people - from the Secretary General of Stalin to the executioner of Blokhin? But how could they, these agents of the victim of Hitlerism, as a result, inflated both the gullible Gorbachev and no less gullible Yeltsin, and even about horror! - Putin and Medvedev, forcing them to apologize for their predecessors accused of monstrous crimes?

However, God is with them, with these stars of the negative sky. They - with all their passionarity - can be regretted. Clio - Muse is not shy.

But why are they so stubbornly supported by the leaders of the RVIO, who are not tired of hitting themselves in the chest and swear in their fidelity to “historical truth”? Among the functionaries of the society are unmeasured diverse bosses, including governors, ministers, presidential assistants - and all of them suddenly discovered in themselves and for themselves “love for paternal coffins” and the vein of a home historian.

So is it not better for them to put their lobbying potentials to all and get from the state and from law enforcement agencies that their archives are revealed in order to feed future books and discussions in real professional forums? Or at least insisting on the resumption of the criminal “Katyn” case, all the more on the Investigative Committee, a whole structure has been created, specially designed to identify and punish Nazi criminals from the war (the most, you see, time), and it would do this.

And maybe the state is enough to keep the executioners and victims of the executioners in a dispute, stop protecting them, palack, peace and feelings?

And is it time to finally return the boards leading with vandals-trinkets to their usual places, namely and punish those who dismantled them?

But so far, frank falsification of history is recognized as the struggle for the only true history of the country, which is still exhausting from the ongoing provocations of its many enemies.