The area of ​​shame

RSPP will continue to fight the “last address” signs (11x19 cm) in court

Executive Vice-President of the Trade Union of billionaires (RSPP), professor of the Higher School of Economics Dmitry Kuzmin published a written text in a popular newspaper of blood. Under the heading “Conveyor” of the last address, you must stop! ” If you miss the time, the professor in a popular newspaper writes with pain, our cities will turn into cemeteries. Whether a joke - already more than a thousand signs (each - the size of a postcard) hangs along the walls of our houses; A little more left; Only in the 37-38th years, at the peak of great terror, 681,692 people were destroyed (according to official figures) ...

By the way, I will say

The best way would be - not to shoot fellow citizens at all, and the descendants would not have to live in such a cemetery under any conditions.

But the area of ​​one plate is 11x19 cm, 0.021 square meters. If they roll Moscow with them, it will turn out about 18 009 square meters. Red Square - for comparison - only 24,750 squares. Also a little, in essence, will also remain for parades.

You can not worry, Mr. Kuzmin. Live calmly.

He signed under his text simply: “The grandson of the executed red officer”, without other titles. Are you hiding! It turns out that the vice president of Kuzmin has been worth the death for two years and, under various pretexts, does not give permission to install four (0.08 square meters in total) the tablets on the wall of the house belonging to the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs. The initiator of the "Last address" Sergey Parkhomenko emotionally told about this on the live air of the Echo of Moscow.

But he did not connect Kuzmin with the author of the note in the Moscow Komsomolets.

That is, the RSPP had a fabulous opportunity-to remain silent; Not everyone found out who and with what arguments defends our right to live thoughtlessly and unconsciously.

Only you can not get into the mud if such a marvelous opportunity suddenly opened!

And the RSPP filed a lawsuit against the Echo of Moskvy on the radio station, demanding to protect his honor, dignity and business reputation.

What do the gentlemen see the billionaire an attempt on their business reputation, honor and dignity?

I studied the statement of claim with all possible attentiveness. Links to laws, regulatory documents ... eight pages! And not a line - what, in fact, is about, even the very surname Parkhomenko is not. They would write: “Echo of Moscow” spreads false information, slanders that we are trying to bury the memory of the victims of Stalinism, rewritten history, justify repressions ...

No!

In general, they ask for half a million rubles of reimbursement and another 6 thousand legal costs, and they recall about “honor and dignity” only at the very end, in a naming order. I will not enter into legal thickets, ahead of the court, which is the arguments of the defense. But the fact that the leaders of the RSSP seem to have completely lost the ability to evaluate their words and actions, I think, I think, is worth it.

And, so to speak, on the procedural issue.

Once I did not say friends-in general, I was closely familiar with Yegor Timurovich Gaidar. I understand that not everyone is now approved for this now, but I'm now talking about something else. So, Gaidar told me, as in December 1992 he was fired from the government, and no Yeltsin defended him. He returns home, of course, upset, and somewhere around 12 in the morning a friend and a colleague come, Deputy Prime Minister. We went to the kitchen, drank, and tells Yegor a friend and a comrade -in -arms (who remained in the government): "I have long wanted to tell you that you are wrong ..."

Found the time and place!

So far, in the Bureau of the RSPP, except that Anatoly Borisovich Chubais showed adequacy. He wrote a letter to his President Shokhin. “Given that this dispute has already grown out of private correspondence to a public conflict affecting the reputation of both the RSPP, and each of us, I believe that the position of the Union on this issue must be discussed and determined at the next meeting of the Bureau of the Board of the RSPP. Moreover, I consider it fundamentally important and correct issues of this level of intensity and resonance without fail to consider at the Bureau of Board before applying to the court on behalf of the Union.

I inform you that while the discussions of this issue have not happened, I cannot take a position in support of the appeal of the RSPP to the court. ”