Dein Kampf

People who are passionate about various kinds of struggle are usually sure that the whole world around is fighting. Either on their side, or against them. And they consider any word regarding the object of “struggle” as a gesture of support or the attack of the enemy.

So Semyon Slepakov fell into the disaster, who did not suspect that there were serious reasons for thousands of goals why the satire could become inappropriate at someone’s address.

It is impossible to argue with fighters. In addition, they are usually not real fighters, but imaginary. They go to work, do household chores, relax with friends and relatives, but choose a platform like Facebook for barricades and they vigilantly monitor manifestations such as “their/alien”.

Yavlinsky was even worse. He got sick of explaining his completely sound position of the hopeless darkness of the haters, including educated, famous, critically thinking. No one wants to read Yavlinsky’s articles and think about his words - the majority was content with quotes given by television propaganda, which they have not been looking for many years.

Actually, both Slepakov and Yavlinsky have long been in a public field, they should get used to the recklessness of the crowd and therefore they are not sorry. More complicated by random loners that find themselves in the center of local scandals. It is not true that it is forbidden to talk about politics with the mention of a sacred surname by new morality, ethics and new hunwebins who did not expect from - from the beautiful future of our country, fenced from doubtful wire.

You can’t now just in his social network where a person is used to talking about cats or motorcycles and has some kind of audience, take and write about political doubts. They will come right there and give everything - mainly in Mordas. Often - from both sides. Both problems at work can arise, and preoccupied with an imaginary, or even real struggle, friends/Frends will raise a laugh. Or on a stake.

It seems to fighters and “fighters” that they are in war, they almost convinced themselves of this. They do not understand the detachment or ironicity of civilians - one cannot be neutral when war. This syndrome happened among my peers who returned from the "hot spots" in the 90s. They just had an entrusted war around, they go for two days on the train-and everything is different, friends walk with girls, drink beer and do not really perceive you seriously.

Now “real violent” and real convinced are extremely few. It is better not to argue for most of them - not because they are evil - as a rule, these people really risk a lot, and far from always for their own skin.

The rest is worse. If you are expensive for your opinion and also understand that “a topic that does not allow jokes is a frivolous topic,” get ready to keep the defense. This side of the street is most dangerous at the shelling.

Original