The expulsion of Litvinovich from the pre -trial detention center

PMCs turn into an imitation of human rights activities

An attempt to achieve the exclusion of Moscow from her composition Marina Litvinovich will be an attempt to get an act that voted for this, after which it will be impossible to restore their reputation, as well as the reputation of the institute of the PMC itself, in the eyes of human rights defenders will be impossible. The final decision should be made by the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, but the issue, apparently, has been agreed with it in advance.

There is a sequel
Former prisoners of the center in Sakharovo opened a petition against the exclusion of Marina Litvinovich from the PMC. Support!

The Law on the PMC was adopted in 2008, in another era, and secured a number of powers for their members, the main of which consists in unhindered access to closed places of forced content, subordinate to the Federal Penitentiary Service and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, as well as the possibilities of asking questions related to their rights, those who are contained there. Regional PMCs are a unique institution of civil society, which is still somewhere performing real functions of public control over the work of state repressive structures, although the degree of activity of the PMC in different regions is very different.

According to the Law on the PMC, their composition is approved by the Council of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. The PMC of the first compositions worked very actively, the general public became known the systemic problems of places of imprisonment, which not only the FSIN could not like.

Gradually, former law enforcement officers and persons close to them began to be included in the PMC, scandals associated with the use of the rights of PMC members for selfish purposes,

And the human rights activists had less and less a chance of getting into their composition. In particular, during the latest rotations, such active participants as Andrei Babushkin and Zoya Svetova did not get to the Moscow PMC, but Yana Teplitskaya and Ekaterina Kosarevskaya, who were the same, which analyzed the practice of torture, including the “network” (prohibited in the Russian Federation), were not included in the PMC of St. Petersburg.

The mechanism of the formation of the PMC in the Council of the Public Chamber is opaque. The Moscow PMC of the last convocation was formally headed by the head of the Good Technology Foundation and entrepreneur Georgy Volkov, the leader of the informal association of private security enterprises Dmitry Galochkin played an important role in it, and Nikolai Zuev made a statement on the exclusion of Litvinovich. All three in human rights circles are not widely used.

Litvinovich, who became a member of the PMC in 2019, goes to places of compulsory maintenance of Moscow as a job, she talked about the conditions for their maintenance and needs of the eight hundred prisoners of the Sakharov special receiver sent there after the January unauthorized shares. Among the 22 members of the commission who voted for depriving her mandate (at seven against), there are simply no people who perform a comparable volume of work, but

Such activity, apparently, set up the “leadership” against Litvinovich and a number of other members of the PMC.

In 2021, this was already the second unscheduled meeting of the PMC members in the Zum - Eve Merkacheva, which covers his work in MK, was presented on the first claim, and Lyubov Volkova, who allegedly offended colleagues from the Tver region with a message about the poor conditions of the content of Alexander Shestun. Litvinovich also made a remark that she handed over to the family of one of the prisoners his request to contact a specific lawyer.

On March 5, the “Comrade Court” also analyzed the behavior not only of Litvinovich, but took into account that she already had a “comment with the entry”. Zuev saw either in her interview with “rain”, or in her message on Facebook about visiting Lyubov Sobol in IvS on Petrovka in December 2020 “Violation of the Secrets of the Investigation”: according to Sobol Litvinovich, she said that in her case of “penetration into the dwelling” the alleged participant in the special operation against Navalny Sobol interrogated at night and she had seized shoes and seized her shoes and seized her shoes and seized her shoes. Protective mask.

The investigator in the case of Sobol The issue of violating Litvinovich of the secrets of the investigation was not posed, the subscription about the non -disclosure of the data of the preliminary investigation was not taken from her. The shoes, in which sable, “penetrated”, is “a secret”, the violation of which can put this case in jeopardy. Article 14 of the Law on the PMC regulating the procedure for terminating the powers of their members does not contain such a basis as “violation of the mystery of the investigation”.

The mechanism of emasculation of the meaning of the work of externally democratic institutions through a quiet replacement of their personnel was developed by the current government at all levels -

Through this, the parliament and courts, as well as the Public Chamber, however originally created as a Simulakr, have long passed. The expulsion of Marina Litvinovich from the PMC will deprive those who are legally and illegally in places of imprisonment.

So in the same is the meaning of “internal policy”.