Maniac drinks cognac and chooses Sobchak

The film about the "Skopinsky maniac" caused the indignation of the audience

The devil knows where this stupid saying with a primitive rhyme came from - “maniac/cognac”. But the rhyme is now the triple: "Sobchak/maniac/cognac." The maniac drinks in front of the camera ... Well, not cognac, but beer, enjoying the taste forgotten in 17 years, and the sealing of a storm that is sitting opposite the woman (“There are only men in the zone. You will see a woman - the mood rises”). The woman, she is Ksenia Sobchak, as if specifically for the delight of the gaze of her “hero”, put on a free blue cardigan with a neckline nowhere, from time to time, falling from the shoulder and exposing a flirty strap from a bra.

A maniac, he is Mokhov, who had been holding two young captives in a pierce of two years for almost four years, is clearly flattered by the lady's visit. He generally rejoices at the attention of the media, admits that he is all “according to the high”.

The “lady” revels in his own steepness: she is the first who managed to penetrate the house to the maniac and take an interview. Perhaps the first were the employees of one of the federal television channels, who seemed to take him to shoot in Moscow directly from the colony. But even they either disdain, or were afraid to issue their “exclusive” on the air. And Ksenia Sobchak is not squeamish and not fearful. In addition, I am sure that everyone in her place would not miss such a unique chance. And the maniac chose Sobchak.

“This is our right as journalists - to explore the boundaries of good and evil,” she says with Paphos.

Good, however, remains outside the “research”, and evil reveals itself in the guise of such a mild stump. Reflection and self -digging is unknown to him, and the interviewer speaks with him not as a villain, but as with a provincial grandfather, who is not averse to recalling the past.

Mokhov describes the history of his wild crime with nostalgic sadness: “The girls were good, polite. New Year, March 8, they celebrated together - they set the table. They are pleased too. One of them, Katya, fell in love, I still love ... I am not sexually preoccupied and not a pervert. I am like everyone else. "

Sobchak, in order not to inadvertently angry the maniac, does not argue and replace the concepts with the same ease, calling the violence “sex”, the rapist is simply loving: “Mokhova ruined his love of love.” An independent expert psychologist comments in the same spirit: "This is not sexual concern for him, but life, love."

To match the interviewer and the expert - the investigator who led the case of the "Skopinsky maniac." He recalls with a strange smile various sickening details. He considers him not a maniac, but a moron. He goes home to Mokhov and communicates, like a good old friend after a long separation: "17 years old, and passed as one day." He, the investigator, talks about the first day of the work of the opera. He came to the department in a snow -white shirt, and sent to the station toilet, where the children, looking into the “point”, saw a human hand. While he pulled the body out of the toilet and washed out - he himself was so packed up in sewage. I had to forget about white shirts. Such work.

The journalist, according to Sobchak, is also such a job, and therefore stenching miasms emanating from the object of “research”, as well as immersion in a stench abyss, is not afraid of it. Spectators, according to her representation, also love this, even though for a look and turn their nose.

And do not deceive yourself. We are all a little Mokhov. Each of us is in our own way!

Director Konstantin Bogomolov (the husband of Ksenia Sobchak), protecting her from attacks in social networks (they write different cleanlies, they say, “you cannot show a maniac as a person, you cannot give him glory and fame, humanizing nonhumans”), and this picture causes ... the fact that the maniac appears here one of us. An ordinary grandfather ... He is ordinary to nausea ... And the one who broadcasts about disgust is not so much squeamish as he is cowardly. ”

Ksenia Sobchak herself in response to the indignation of the audience publishes a small video. On it, a successful interviewer, turning his back to the camera, whims at the back of the music. That is, as it were, he says: go to w ... and put your indignation there.

The director of the film about the maniac, Sergei Yerzhenkov, also accuses of the hypocrisy and hypocrisy of those who "pricks, but stubbornly eats a cactus." Type - we are not the first, we did not have the latter removed the maniac, but it was Sobchak who caused indignation. Because - Sobchak!

He is right. They are not the first. The tradition of losing a nightmare and ugly (not research, namely, relishing) originates on a large TV, where maniacs have long been elevated to the rank of “heroes of our time”. “The bloodthirsty serial killer, who for many years kept the entire Voronezh region for many years, was released and today in our studio will meet with relatives of the victims,” the viewer was bred on one of the usual current shows of the NTV channel. And if only for one. And only on NTV.

Well, Ksenia Sobchak is the flesh from the flesh of this “box”, in which its “best” qualities were in demand: non-reproachment, the absence of any ethical barriers and the desire for glory at all costs.

It is ridiculous that now at the same NTV in the talk show “Place of meeting” they arrange a discussion on the topic of whether it is possible to interview with maniacs, and Sobchak and her team are reproached with immorality.

It is not ridiculous that the mud, which has long been familiar to TV, brought Sobchak to YouTube, which many consider to be a healthy alternative to a traditional television, although it does not change the ether. Multistress! Detailed reconstructions of the murder of the father of the sisters of the Khachaturian and the brutal murder with the dismemberment of the body of the lover Professor Sokolov in the program of the First Channel "Dok.Tol" was demonstrated by Ksenia Sobchak, for which there are neither forbidden topics. The fact that such techniques are an additional test for the victims, their families and, in general for the faint of heart, - neither she, who are responsible for the broadcast of broadcasters, worries. All of them are generally sure that demand gives birth to a proposal, and not vice versa.

A few hours after the film about the maniac was published on the YouTube channel “Caution: Sobchak” and fell into “Trend No. 1”, director Yerzhenkov in the FB proudly wrote: “That's the answer to the question why you need to shoot such films.”

And the maniac drinks cognac. He is also not in the lining. Firstly, I received some kind of money for the shooting, and secondly-a glory that will help him to establish personal life. To the question of Sobchak, where he is going to look for women, smuts smugly: "There are such women who are exciting that a maniac." It is much worse that this excites not only women. At least, the “Skopinsky maniac” planned the crime after he saw on TV the predecessor, who was the first to imprisoned the victim in the dungeon. Here you have the answer to the question why you do not need to make such films. One of the answers.