We ask the prosecutor

This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

I ask you to bring to me and in my face to all interested residents to the legal assessment of the modern activities of its government.

1. What legislative acts allow the governor I.V. Vasiliev to exercise authority remotely, with permanent residence in Moscow? The facts say that this is to the detriment of the population even in such an aspect as the desired strengthening of the ties of the region with the center: the rating of the Kom fell to 78 out of 85 places.

2. Having not made a worthy contribution to the development of modern Co., the governor does not value his predecessors made by his predecessors. So, he went about the leisure officials from culture and blessed the unreasonable, voluntarist renaming of the most famous museum of local lore into a historical one, illegally and illiterately leading the “local history” to “ethnography”. At the same time, no one asked Kirovchan. Is this legal?

3. The region, like the whole country, is experiencing difficult times. From the authorities are expected to mobilize all forces and means, and not dubious games in renaming. Manipulations with the museum of local lore would require budget funds, the spending of which is now unforgivable. Only the promotion of the "new brand" would cost the regional cultural department, as experience shows, into millions. And this is with the most severe shortage of schools and kindergartens, funds to clean the city from landfills and snow, etc.