
Yesterday's Russian Guard Alexander says little. Until recently, he rejoiced at the receipt of lieutenant stars and planned his career in law enforcement agencies, and today he only frowned and prefers not to remember this. The stumbling block was the judicial dispute of his family with the administration of Yekaterinburg. As soon as the young man joined in defense of his rights to his family in Yekaterinburg, who went to his family in Yekaterinburg, in the Russian Guard he was directly told that he could replenish the ranks of the unemployed if he continues to sue with the authorities.
And then the winter rallies of protest began, to participate in the acceleration of which Alexander had no desire. And he put a statement about his own.
Private courtyard on Korkinskaya, 9. A small wooden house, warm, inhabited. Behind the house is a large garden, in the center is a 70-year-old cedar. For the family - not just a tree, it is a memory, a living story.

“Our house was bought by our house in the middle of the last century,” said Tatyana Sign, Alexander’s mother. - Her husband, a priest, was shot in Stalin's times. After several years in exile, she returned and bought half of this house. My parents brought me here at six months of age. My childhood passed here, my children grew up here. This is our generic nest, which once became an obstacle for the commercial plans of one developer.
Cedar is the only thing that remains in memory of Aunt Nina, the daughter of a repressed priest. Like her mother, she spent many years in camps for many years. A seedling was brought from the Siberian link. Nina has been gone for a long time, but there is a cedar.

After the death of the grandmother, the house was four masters.
Three are family members a sign, but one corner belonged to a stranger. This has become a weak link.
As soon as next to the private sector, the Ephesus developer decided to build another skyscraper, all residents of the small quarter Korkinskaya -Miassskaya have various kinds of problems. In the House of Signs, the developer bought a “quarter”, issued it to the wife of the company owner and began to destroy the house from the inside, more precisely, from one corner. There is a trash here today.
“I don't want to leave the house,” says Alexander. -Why should we give the land when someone wanted to earn on this site? The developer is fighting with us and with neighbors with all available means. There were nine houses on a small street, three burned immediately after the owners refused to sell them at a low cost. I myself helped my neighbors extinguish a fire ... This is what to do after all their property burned down? Agreed to leave even with little money. I installed video surveillance, and the fires stopped.
According to local residents, the developer told them in direct text: you will not leave with this money (500 thousand rubles per hundredth), get less. Representatives of Ephesus LLC promised that all obstinate land would simply be removed for municipal needs. Very little time passed, and the administration plans suddenly appeared a road - exactly through the sections of the disagreement. At the same time, it was not in the general plan of the city’s development. If you look at the developer’s website, then in the photo of the planned housing complex posted there, it is clear: the territory of private residential buildings is needed only for car parking near the high -rise.
“For two years now we have been convicted of maintaining our right to land,” continues Alexander, a representative of the fourth generation of the family of signs living on Korkinskaya, 9. “The map shows that the alleged road affects only a small part of our garden.” Why take away the whole plot with a house from us? The courts make decisions in favor of the city administration acting in the interests of the developer. At one of the meetings, the representative of the developer Vavilov, completely not embarrassed by the fact that the protocol was being conducted, said that on her call the review of the regional Ministry of Construction will be changed. Which happened.
“It is difficult for the developer and officials to understand that a person does not want to sell his property, and it's not about money here,” Tatyana Sign is connected to the conversation. - I never asked Ephesus money, I defend my right of private property. Today, we are forcibly buying land for cheap, and tomorrow, like 100 years ago, they will be taken for free, like my ancestors - enemies of the people.
The land of Alexander Zaikov adjoins the site of signs. His house is almost not visible due to earthen dumps and mountains of construction debris. Only the top of the roof is visible-the one-story house was in the foundation of the pit created by the developer, and once rose on the river bank.
“We fished here since childhood, swimming on a boat,” recalls Alexander Zaikov. - They took water from the spring, and now the spring was filled with clay. The column with water was also removed. In winter, the snow can still be drowned, and so you have to go for a kilometer for water with a canister on a wheelbarrow. There are no roads now either - everyone has been overwhelmed. In winter, I clear the snow, in the off -season I spread stones and earth. Otherwise, do not pass.

Alexander, although he is trying to be an optimist and even joke, but the question interferes: if something happens to his mother, and she will get here for 80, how will an ambulance get here?
“I don’t understand why the developer was allowed to fill up the shore like that,” Zaykov is indignant, showing photos of 20 years ago, where it is clearly visible: where the mountains of clay and construction waste today, the river had previously flowed. - We are already tired of writing in the instance. Some unsubscriptions. And in general, why build a skyscraper on the shore? The water is close here. I see that it is constantly being pumped out from under the building under construction. The pump works almost around the clock. And people settled - what will happen?
The company "Ephesus" to the journalist "New" explained that the pumping technology is standard. When people settled, the water will accumulate less.

“The condition of the Iset River in this part of the city has yet to be appreciated,” says Anna Baltina, organizer of the initiative group “Parks and Squares of Yekaterinburg”. - Even if the shore is swampy and overgrown, to pile the earth there - to violate the environmental zone.
According to Baltina, the development of the water -fire zone is also a violation. In addition to the residential sector on the opposite shore - an industrial enterprise. Falling asleep, the developer can change the floodplain of the river.
“What will happen to the Lower Isetsky Pond is not clear,” says Anna. -We see how the Lower-Iset pond is being built today in a completely barbaric way, and no one even makes predictions than all this will turn out.
In the environmental prosecutor's office of the Sverdlovsk region, Novaya Gazeta did not answer questions about the situation with Iset. The Nizhne-Ob Basin Water Administration explained that “the right to use the river in the area of Korkinskaya, Miassskaya, Shcherbakova in Yekaterinburg for the construction of bridges, underwater crossings, pipelines and other linear facilities, if such construction and reconstruction were associated with a change in the bottom and shores of surface water bodies, were not provided.” The department transmitted information about the possible pollution of the Iset River to the Sverdlovsk Rosprirodnadzor.
The representative of Ephesus claims that the company conscientiously complies with all laws, including environmental protection. For all the claims, the company spokesman Yaroslav Kulikov sees only Tatyana's machinations.
“The only“ trump card ”that Tatyana’s sign remained is to blame the company's company“ Ephesus ”of violating environmental legislation, which also has no reason,” the press secretary is sure.

This story gave rise to many disputes among Yekaterinburgers. Some with barely hidden envy are outraged by the arrogance of private traders, requiring serious compensation for their “couple of hundred parts and rotten”. Others regret families who love their land and do not want to leave it only because the developer found a Piglet closer to public communications.
“You understand, this is part of the general plan for the development of Yekaterinburg,” the press secretary of Ephesus explains to me. - There will still be no private development in the city. It should look beautiful and updated.
Why developers reluctantly take up remote territories, there is no intelligible answer.
The family of signs went through many court litigations in an attempt to defend their right to private property. At one of the meetings, the judge repeatedly asked the representative of the administration of Yekaterinburg: “If your road passes through the edge of the garden of the signs, why do you need the entire site?” Officials repeated all the time: we need it all ... why? There is no answer to this question.
“The road in this territory is not provided for by the General Plan of the city,” explains Roman Kachanov, a family lawyer. - But the court does not pay attention to this, based not on the law, but on the expediency. Yes, the situation formally contradicts the law, but its change will do more harm. The court, unfortunately, sided with the developer.

According to the lawyer, the mechanism is this: if a person does not want to sell his plot, the land is assigned to municipal needs, and in fact is given to developers. Which, in fact, is the same private person as Tatyana Sign.
“We have an equality principle,” Roman Kachanov continues. -Developers, if they want the land, must somehow negotiate with the owners, and not use the administrative resource. In such issues, corruption schemes are visible. In fact, the road is a passage to a multi -storey building that is building a commercial structure. In court, the expert said that the road is considered local, what does municipal needs have to do with it?
Tatyana the sign does not pretend to be any land except her own, and the developer claims to be her land.
And immediately the administration and the court begin to act exclusively in the interests of the Ephesus.
As a result, the developer, with the assistance of the administration, forcibly bought their house with the site from the owners. Anastasia Belousova, the wife of the general director of Ephesus, received more than two million, in whose name a fourth part of the house and 5 acres of land was bought. 6.5 million paid Maria a sign, younger sister of Tatyana, the mistress of 1/4 of the house and 5 acres of land. Of course, a family of four (by decision of the court had to pay 2 million rubles.) They wanted to pay less, but her husband Mikhail promised to make an act of self -immolation before the regional government to come to desperation with endless litigation. Then they urgently gathered a meeting in the Ministry of Construction and agreed with Maria a sign on a more or less acceptable amount of ransom.

“We perfectly understand that for a smaller amount of a family of four it is difficult to buy housing in Yekaterinburg,” the representative of the developer philosophically remarks. By the way, a small one -room apartment (22 sq. M) in a skyscraper, which is built by Ephesus a few meters from the site of the signs, costs 2.3 million rubles. And this is at the stage of incomplete construction.
Tatyana's money was forcibly paid - almost four million for half the house and 900 square meters. m of the land. Despite the fact that all bank accounts were closed, the developer somehow managed to find a credit account, which Tatyana used many years ago and considered it closed in connection with the repayment of the loan. The money was transferred to him. She plans to return them to the developer. Half a million was sent to the daughters of Tatyana, whose 200 square meters did not. m of the land.
“Tatyana the sign demanded a hundred million rubles from the developer,” the Ephesus press secretary told the “new” correspondent. True, there is no evidence of this requirement distributed in the press. Neither written nor oral.
Having lost in local courts, Tatyana the Sign expects to achieve justice in the Supreme Court of Russia. If her arguments do not hear there, in the European Court of Human Rights.