Before and after the "look"

Why does the radioactive ash continue to knock in the heart of Dmitry Kiselev?

So a holiday came to our street - the country is preparing for a “direct line” with the president. Outside the holiday, only the voice of Pavel Zarubin with his ode “Moscow. Kremlin. Putin "rings from the happiness of familiarization with the shrines. But now, in anticipation of the "line", the whole army of Pavlov Zarubin is advanced to the forefront. They murmure cheerfully in the frame about the problems of Russians. The three query leaders demonstrates the enviable mental balance of the electorate: social sphere; Housing and communal services and the fate of dilapidated housing; Health. In the struggle for the nearest bright future of compatriots, volunteers of the All -Russian Popular Front help the president. Valery of Valuysky outlines the front of the work with wide strokes: "One grandmother asked to help her with a wheelchair, restore a cottage there, something else."

The more darling the “straight lines”, the pompous preparations for them. And this is understandable: a strange one, which has no analogues in the world, the ritual will perform for the 18th time. In irony, it was precisely these days of the Surkov, claiming the title of Demiurge of the system, he suddenly gave an interview to the Financial Times. This is the same demiurge who dipped the deep people into sovereign democracy, providing all that exists controlled diversity (I hear a similar Jesuit definition for the first time; so they all together and controlled to Navalny with the traces of the “beginner”).

Surkova is no longer on the surface of the authorities, and the culture created by him, which he is so proud of, is. And her apotheosis, the “direct line” of the president, is also there.

All coincidences are usually not random. Twenty years ago, hope for freedom rolled. In April 2001, the View program closed, the first-born of this freedom (or its illusions), and in December of the same year a new format for communication between a leader with a nation was born. Since then, the nation no longer needs free commentators, one president with his very “direct line” is enough.

I also remembered this causal relationship because Anatoly Lysenko passed away. This piece in every sense man came up with the best of the possible - the View program. The reckless and at the same time romantic youths broke into the houses of Soviet citizens dumbfounded by perestroika, as it seemed, right from the street. YouTube has retained many issues since the first. At that time, it is worth plunging to understand how the uncontrolled (surk) diversity looked like. News programs are perceived as exciting detectives, and congresses of people's deputies of the USSR live-as the best talk shows in the world.

But what's interesting. Parsing from the height of today to molecules and atoms that time, it is clear how the energy of decay is growing in the thick of hopes. Even the legendary “look” was akin to the elements of a rally that cannot last endlessly. After some time, a private television company arose on its basis, which produces successful television programs on an industrial scale, but this was a completely different story. The ten -year anniversary of the “look” now looks like a separate insert novel. The Ostankino invited former famous announcers from the former Ostankin, whom Yakubovich, with breadth that was characteristic of him that evening, called the discoverers of television. The piquancy of the situation was that several private companies, including the species, swallowed the Ostankino, along with the discoverers expelled from it. This awkwardness was smoothed with the help of generous gifts. Viktor Balashov with his velvet timbre left the generous field of miracles on the new black "Volga" ...

Therefore, I was stuck on this issue of the program that it contains a whole collection of stereotypes of recent history, and not only from the spheres of saving and absorption. The very community of former viewers, who were heavy from the cargo of unreasonable ambitions and exorbitant claims, looked strange. The conversation did not stick. They wanted to resolve the main issue of our time - whether the amount of evil in the world has increased after the “look”, but they did not decide.

I saw one thing, but the fundamental difference between how common is the Golden Age of Russian journalism from the present, not at all gold.

Eternal dilemma: what is more expensive for us, the darkness of low truths or a rise of a deception-then the participants in the process were decided differently.

Now - only in favor of "elevating deception." And if before the Mirage had vague outlines, now Kiselev has formulated the essence. She opened Dmitry Konstantinovich after Putin's meeting with Bayden in Geneva, which he interpreted as the victory of Russian weapons. The American president finally realized that in the event of a war, the United States would turn into a radioactive ash. Kiselev restrainedly praised Biden for quick wits. The idea of ​​this itself Pepley has long, since the annexation of Crimea, the road to the master. He voices it with special voluptuousness. Especially now, when Kiselev is convinced: Russia and the United States have agreed on an equal footing.

Dubious valor is to be proud of the possibility of ash. But what if there are no other worthy reasons? Although why not? There is a “direct line”. The good news has just come. TV channels are laid down for the president’s communication with the people for about three hours of airtime. The people rejoice.