The court did not prohibit candidate for the Murmansk City Council Violetta Grudina from leaving the house in the case of violating quarantine

The Oktyabrsky District Court of Murmansk did not choose a preventive measure in the case of quarantine violation (Article 236 of the Criminal Code) for the former head of Navalny’s headquarters, Violetta Grudina, who was nominated to the city parliament. about this The activist spoke in her Telegram channel.

The Interior Ministry investigator asked to prohibit the oppositionist from leaving the house, except for two walks, and from using the Internet. After the court decision, as Grudina clarified , he took her undertaking not to leave the place and took her home for a search.

the case against her on The Ministry of Internal Affairs announced July 9. According to investigators, Grudina, knowing about her positive coronavirus test, left the house and “had contact with an unknown number of people.” SeverPost's law enforcement source claimed that at that time she was distributing leaflets as part of her campaign.

Grudina told Mediazona that she had not left the apartment since June 19 after she felt symptoms of infection; The test she took a week later was positive. According to her, she counted the period of self-isolation from the first date and went outside for the first time more than two weeks later - on July 5. The test she took on July 11 was negative.

Despite this, the court ordered her forced hospitalization a few days later; a representative of Rospotrebnadzor said in court that she falsified the results of the new test. On July 26, Grudina went on a hunger strike due to the refusal of hospital staff to hand over her documents to the election commission.

This morning she was detained leaving the hospital. The activist said that she felt bad after the arrest. She was taken to another hospital, but they did not admit her to inpatient treatment, although the indicators, according to her, were “bad.”

In early June, Navalny’s “social movement headquarters” were also recognized by the court as extremist organizations. Their representatives appealed the decision.