
Russian politicians and propagandists in the week were interrupted by joyful hooting about the victory in Afghanistan of a friendly, but still terrorist and prohibited Taliban in the country. Now the heavyweights of the propaganda front are gradually returning to the main Zhupel of last week: the terrible “Kyrgyz” and “Kazakh nationalists”. After the beating of a 9-year-old child on Issyk-Kul, propaganda found a similar story in Kazakhstan: there a boy in the yard was broken by an older teenager. This is served like this: "The Russian kid was called to wave, would not go - they soaked it." However, there is no evidence at all that they fought with the boy because of his nationality, however, the leading “Live Solovyov” focuses on the fact that the Kazakhs became “courageous”, because nationalists walk along the streets and demand from all apologies for the use of the Russian language aloud.
It would seem that from almost nothing interstate conflict with the participation of high -ranking politicians of the three states was supposed to come to naught. In Kyrgyzstan, a man who threw a calculator at a girl who speaks in Russian was sent to a pre -trial detention center, even despite the reluctance of the victim herself to inflate a interethnic fire. The Kazakhstan blogger Kuatu Akhmetov, who laid out the videos not very popular by the standards of the Kazakh segment of YouTube with “language patrols”, closed the entrance to Russia for 50 years. Even the First Deputy Administration of the President of Kazakhstan, Dauren Abaev, openly substituted for a blow, mentioning the “cave nationalism”: not only did this expression of Vladimir Putin, but, without leaving Polotona, actually called all the Kazakhs linguistic radicals. Everything so that only the northern neighbor calms down.

But go. The same Akhmetova in her telegram channel actually advertised Margarita Simonyan, posting the addresses of all his accounts in social networks. On the air of the same Solovyov, a hint was that it was time to introduce repressions against “Kazakh labor migrants” (apparently, by the type of expulsion of Georgians in 2006). Claims also appeared to Uzbekistan, where the local journalist demanded that Elena Babenko speak Uzbek in the walls of the parliament (despite the fact that the significance of the Russian language in the republic, unlike Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, is significantly lower).
The last word in the war against the rebellious Kazakhs is the “law against Russophobes”, which was prepared by United Russia. Everything was dumped into it: from humiliation on a national basis to the desecration of military graves (well, insulting veterans, of course).
Now, if someone in the world, and especially in the post-Soviet countries, will try to even say a word against the Russian people-they will not let him into Russia anymore.
Apparently, the law will work in the opposite direction: those who offend the Russian world and the Russian spirit within the country will be sent. The propagandist Soloviev was already resurrected, imagining how, for example, the comedian Idrak Mirzalizade was sent out of the country for his unsuccessful joke. Considering that even without this law, almost a hundred thousand people were banned from the beginning of 2021 only from the beginning of 2021, one can imagine what scope for work is opened for employees with a stamp “denied” the border. It can simply be reminded that “Russophobes” are now called those who consider Ivan the Terrible cruel, and even the singer Manizh was accused of “Russophobia” for being sings about a “Russian woman”. Eh, if the Russian dream came true - to ban everyone and at the same time send - what life would have come then!
Obvious thought number one - “these are games before the elections” - and the obvious thought number two - “friends - all, enemies - law” - are clear. Russian ideologists urgently needed a new enemy, since the old ones-Ukraine and the USA-somehow ceased to excite. And in the case of Central Asia, you can always play the scene "We fed them, sewed them, and they draw Figwams to us." So, by the way, it takes place: for example, on “Constantinople”, not by night to be mentioned, “experts” say that everything in Central Asia was made by Russia's hands in Soviet times, and if Russia disappears from the region, the country is waiting for “desolation”.

The only problem is that if you stand for a moment in place of the conditional ideological block with the “nightingales” under his arm (would not forget to wash after that!), Their own concept “Protect Russians around the world” flies into tartarars. In the same Kazakhstan, the vast majority of Russian-speaking people can still get any services in government agencies and in private structures, communicating in Russian. The tossing of logs to the furnace of interethnic ignition from Russia only adds political points to those who consider the total dominance of the Kazakh language (and not the crowding out of the Russian, as they would definitely say in television talk shows) their political platform. Not to mention the fact that, raising in absolute cases with radicals, who do not even look like heroes in Kazakhstan, Russian ideologists only work on the embittering of the moderate part of the Kazakhs in relation to the moderate part of Russians in Kazakhstan. The question "What the hell are you going to us at all?" Sounds these days in the republic in both languages.
This question is simple to answer this question: the Russian authorities want to look if not a collector of land, then the collector of people and the defender of all Russian people.
Keywords here - “wants to look”, in reality she does not even need it close.
It is much easier and more familiar to show that the enemies got very close, now they are even among friends - which means that you need to rally around the current regime. We will not give you offense! No blogger will never tell you anything in Kazakh, because he will not enter here, and you will not leave there.
If Russia really wanted to do something to attract Russian people from other countries to the historical homeland, it could, perhaps, could engage in the preparation of the normal return mechanism. In the same Kazakhstan, the Oralmans return system (ethnic Kazakhs, returning, as a rule, from China), is established at a relatively good level. In Russia, there is a program for the resettlement of compatriots that works through a stump-column, despite all the titanic efforts of migration management in the Ministry of Internal Affairs: on it, a person only should not bow to Russia already for the fact that she had a favor and accepted it to her. You can also try to get documents on the principle of “native speaker”, which can potentially become an easier road to the treasured “Russian world”. But the country needs declarations, not people. Therefore, those who want their homeland at the call of the soul and blood, the desire to return can fall away when they demand that he translate the certificate of marriage from Russian into Russian or oblige him to indicate in the certificate after passing the PCR test the name and surname only in Russian letters (Latin in documents is apparently also a hidden sign of Russophobe).
It can truly insult a Russian man on this globe, but stronger than the stupidity of his own bosses, he will hardly insult him.