Man in history

This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

Is a person in history an active force or material for an experiment?

I want to start with, apparently, in no way related to the title of the topic - digital technologies and a person.

Today it is often possible to hear - to read - see - the opinion that digital technologies themselves are sufficient to meet all the needs of a person, and of course, a person is even against an ordinary computer, not to mention supercomputers - a weak and dependent creature.

At the same time, the most advanced of the most possible systems is a quantum computer, and in the future - a computer based on a living organism.

Does this scientific activity resemble the work of Professor Preobrazhensky to turn a dog into a person, where in the end he recognized:

“Please explain to me why you need to artificially fabricate spinosis when any woman can give birth to him anywhere. After all, he gave birth in Kholmogory Madame Lomonosov of this famous one. "

Another example: a tree that grows from a seed weighing in a fraction of a gram.

The third example: grass that grows every year in 2-3 months.

And referring to a person in terms of his potential:

This is a supercomputer, which will not succeed in the next 10–20 years, and a biorobot with autonomous energy supply, performance and the ability to perform various actions in various conditions, which is also unattainable for science in the near future.

Thus, the need to create technical simplified analogues of a person is caused not by his potential opportunities, but by the fact that, in fact, he distinguishes him both from animals and biorobots - freedom of will.

At the same time, referring to our, already existing civilization, already existing technical achievements - energy, transport, machine -building - work for the most part not for a person, but for themselves.

That is, simply put, not the car works for a person, but a person for a car.

And bearing in mind the "digital era", it will most likely be the same. At the same time, the most valuable thing is destroyed that a person has and can inherit - the environment.

And referring to the potential power of a person - not comparable with any technical means - why it became possible to make it dependent on these funds?

It seems to me that a sufficient counterweight against one person is only another person.

That is, the dependence of people on technical means is the result of the struggle of people with each other, as a result of which inanimate objects receive power over people, which is understandable - they absolutely do not need.

And here the question is not that any technical achievements are bad or good in themselves, but about the idea that there is value to the original and that there is a derivative value, and the interaction of these values.

And here, from the consideration of the technical characteristics of certain technical means of various kinds and scientific developments in different fields, try to understand what determines the value of a person - the original value or derivative.

Human value is determined by one - the ability to create

Here it seems to me that the value of a person is determined by one - the ability to create.

At the same time, you can again hear - see - read - the opinion - that the ability to create - cannot be provided by the person himself - the conditions that external forces will create - society, the state, the company, etc.

And again the question: so or who is the source of creativity - a person or all these listed communities and organizations?

Here the issue is resolved only through the adoption of the Creator - a person, since all other formations are usually called - hands - individuals acting in history as a person.

Not a single historical science that considers history from various aspects has done without personalities in the historical process. In some schools, everyone else has the name, for example, "masses".

It is assumed that the "masses" are nothing more than the material for the "historical process", deprived of their will and, accordingly, the opportunity to leave at least a tiny imprint in history.

And already connected here with this - the desire to leave a mark in history - the need to have power. Here is such a bunch of history - personality - power.

It seems possible to take this issue in good faith for me personally only through the experiment.

Anonymous story has become my personal business

In this case, it is clear that the object of research here is myself. Despite the fact that I, obviously, an ordinary person, apparently referring to the experiment, we will consider this “historical” figure so far as if possible is unbiased.

You can start here, in principle, with an arbitrarily chosen date of the biography - if the personality is really historical - we will find its traces in history, if the non -sorcerer - between the dates of birth and death, which has not yet come - we will put a dash, and it does not matter what he did there.

From 2003 to 2015, I was engaged in the manufacture of log cabins mainly in the area of ​​the dacha "strawberry mountain". In parallel, I had to create - to come up with - apply - several different technologies directly related to this activity.

In July 2015, I played at Syktyvkar Barkempe-2015, with an idea that I essentially formulated two hours before the performance. Now I call it low -volume and inexhaustible forest use or in another way - “logging from the square” as opposed to the existing one, which I call “logging from the edge”.

I will not go into details here - this is a separate very large topic, as well as the actual production of log houses.

This topic unexpectedly for me was interested in the main editor of the business news in Kirov Oleg Prokhorenko at that time, he made an interview and published this material on 07/26/2015.

Again, having removed my further work on this forest technology aside, I had a question: where did I get this understanding?

Before that, in general, I considered myself the most completely self-sufficient, self-realized and so on. personality, but already in no way connected with the history of my country.

But as a result, mainly the Internet investigation - I found out, and I used to know some facts that I am a descendant of repressed fists - from my father, hence the relationship with two historical figures at once - sequentially Stolypin P. A. and Stalin.

From the mother’s side - through the great -grandfather of Nechaev A.F. The relationship with Zhuravsky A.V. - researcher of the Russian North.

It looks here so far by the ears. Thus, any is a historical person.

We move on. So far, these two figures - Stolypin P.A. and Zhuravsky A.V. - are in no way connected for me. But in the future, I find the material about the participation of A.V. Zhuravsky in the All -Russian Agricultural Exhibition, after which he met with Stolypin P. A. - received the full support and approval of his plans and financing the project for the development of the Pechora Territory.

And here everything turns out. My ancestors, repressed by Stalin, essentially mastered the Pechora Territory - formally - the plan of Zhuravsky A.V., but in relation to people with the exact opposite inhuman essence.

In turn, they became strong peasants thanks to the reforms of Stolypin P.A.

And this is how anonymous story has become my personal affair, which has the most directly related to me.

At the same time, if you add that I lived in Ust-Tsilm in 1975–1977. At 92 Naberezhnaya, in the house of the great -grandfather Nechaev A.F., where the station of Zhuravsky A.V. was located for a while, I also found out then - then the relationship of my personal history and the history of my country becomes obviously inseparable.

Based on this, I can make a subjective and not claiming to be scientific: any and every citizen of our country is a full -fledged participant in the historical process, which affects and can influence the entire history of the country. And this influence directly depends on his conscious or unconscious choice, but in any case, any person bears historical responsibility for his actions or inaction to his ancestors, and to their descendants in the first place.

And in an understandable way, spreading this idea, since events in Russia have an influence on the whole world and there is both immigration and emigration, the personal story of everyone is part of the global history. Once again, I emphasize, the person himself, personally, is not a state, not society, not parents, not friends - he himself. And this is absolute inevitability.

Moreover, no technical achievement of mankind will never be an independent acting power of history. And if - and when it happens - this from my point of view will mean the end of human civilization.

This article was written in 2018.