Translated material
The first went
The case of Kansk teenagers anarchists: there is no sentence, but the convict has already appeared
It turns out that in the loud business of three teenagers in Kansk (Krasnoyarsk Territory), the consideration of which was interrupted by the military tribunal until February 1, there is already the first convicted person. The young man - 18 years old turned over last summer. At the time of the act (more precisely, the non -traditional, which the court is considered criminal) he is 16 and he lives a thousand kilometers from Kansk - in Altai. I have never been to Kansk, not a familiar with any of the defendants (he only corresponded with Nikita Uvarov in VK and Telegram), but in the Kansk teenagers it is he who is a key witness.
The court in Kansk is held closed , with an audio recording ban and listeners in the hall. “New”, however, receives detailed records (transcripts) from one of the participants in the court session, and from the next batch of papers it turns out (events are verbally confirmed by other participants in the process) that now, when teenage games and hobbies have not yet been qualified as a crime, the verdict by the military court has not been sentenced, the Altai witness is already punished for “non -coincidence about the crime” (Article 205.6 of the Criminal Code): He was convicted that he knew what the guys in Kansk were doing, but he did not inform the authorities “about the training in order to carry out terrorist activities”. The court of the non -renewal of the native of Altai took place before the military court in Kansk began his work.
That is, the Altai courts (Blagoveshchensky district and then Barnaul, where the appeal was considered), running forward of the steam locomotive, at a distance understood everything about what happened and is happening in Kansk. Probably, the courts are now focusing not on the Constitution, not on a set of laws, but exclusively on Rosfinmonitoring, who simply included adolescents in the list of terrorists, without waiting for anyone and nothing. Can Rosfinmonitoring be wrong?
What is it, if not ignoring the procedure, neglect even by formal logic and meaning of trial? Not a direct evidence of predetermination? If these assumptions are not true, one thing remains - the key witness was deliberately condemned in advance, put on a short leash, so that he later gives “correct testimonies”.
He gave it.
And if Kansky teenagers are justified? What to do with Altai guy then?
Some details of how the case of teenage anarchism in Kansk reached the interregional level. As early as March 12, the fourth department for the investigation of especially important cases of the UK in the Altai Territory opened a case on the grounds of Art. 205.6 (failure to do about a crime): in 2020, a 16-year-old teenager with Altai corresponded in VK and Telegram with 14-year-old Nikita Uvarov from Kansk and, as they believe in the UK, knew that he committed a crime described by Art. 205.3 of the Criminal Code, in connection with which the Altai trail asked Kansk colleagues to interrogate Uvarov about the details of this communication (a copy of the order sent by fax is in the editorial office).
Judging by the interrogation protocols (July 21, 2020 and March 17, 2021), the Altai guy and the data from lawyers went on a deal with the investigation and spoke about Nikita’s intentions to “blow up or burn the police or the FSB”. And accordingly, he became a key witness in the case of the “Anarcho-Communist Bund”.
Nikita Uvarov in interrogations confirmed the fact of correspondence. “But I definitely will not remember the correspondence of any explosions. If she was, then not seriously. I never wanted to blow up the law enforcement agency, and if I put it with such a meaning somewhere, I said so because I wanted to seem older and more confident. ” Nikita emphasizes that the Altai interlocutor first gave other evidence, and then something changed: “I think this is due to the fact that he himself was under a criminal case, depending on the investigation. Moreover, his prosecution is derived from my criminal case. Due to these circumstances, he may be biased, but I do not keep evil on him. ”
Here are examples of their correspondence two weeks before detention in Kansk. Nikita Uvarov - N. , key witness from Altai - A. Spelling and punctuation preserved. Pay attention to exactly who says. Who dreams about what, who is dissuading whom from what and who asks reasonable questions.
N .: “And for what purpose did you [ Molotov’s cocktails ]? Practice? " A .: "I will set fire to the field) in the village of a farmer, there is a local bourgeois, I will do a little losses to him and first made for a test." N. The first rabbits are still sleeping. Share for everyone to find out ” ]. A .: I didn’t even think about them somehow, but it is unlikely that they live in the fields. ” N .: "There can still be all sorts of mice and the like rodents need to be learned more about the bourgeois." A .: Although I am a ruthless creature, but .. really sorry for the hedgehogs for example *** it would be possible to have a technique of which equipment, but along the perimyer of the camera farm, not as seriously as a field, but also a loss, although if a combine is burned, millions over 12, then already 1/4 fields somewhere). ”
N .: "Why didn't you so fond of him?)" A .: “Hue, my dad was 17 years old *** [ injected ] and when Dad started his business, in the same village, he interfered in every possible way. It was not possible to build a business, so I decided to catch us a little. ” N .: "Hmm, how did he interfere?" A .: “Here is such a story of cops, it has a connection, any illegal, more insignificant step, immediately fines of tens of thousands, etc.”. N .: "Well, yes, it looks like a greedy turbulent." A .: "dragged specifically." N .: “And what does he do at all? A.: “Farmer, small, but profitable, work efficiently for it. 5.000 hectares of land, new equipment. But the work is hard, for such a fee. I think so. In the village, Batya always wanted to live, and here ... Now he will go to the city, in the future he can go to another village, this is his element :) ”
N .: "How much salary?" A .: “According to the seasons, in winter, one can say in general NIMER. For the etching of 80,000 per month, and these are taxing substances, they don’t stand, you can’t return your health anymore. ” N. If only everything is correctly adjusted. And I have a plan. Come to the village, prepare Molotovs, leave the village in the steppe, put a bastard, wait for the night. Move towards the base on foot, and there already choose what to burn. Balaklava on his face on his hands gloves and forward so that it was clear that a person was not from the village, he arrived from somewhere to leave. ” N .: “Okeys is sure that there are no hedgehogs there? Anyone there. " A .: “In technology? AEAEAHAH ". N .: "Well, in the fields)." A .: "I want to burn some expensive combine." N .: "Hmm is possible." A .: “Or you can remove the cameras from the air from the air. I have a pneumatic and air by the way. I’ll go openly, on the basis of 1 person, the maximum is on duty. At night, in Balaclava, there is no chance to find out. ” N .: "Have you talked to him earlier?" A .: “Traces on Earth is still, there you can pull shoes without a tread and walks without problems. And I do not know the location of the dogs. I won’t ask Bati, I will begin to get angry, dissuade ... Well, I will dissuade an anarchiz with anarchise for that was born :) To just sit. ” N .: "Hahah, this is yes." A .: “We would have to be eaten by .. to the anarchists, to stir up things more elegant .. And here we have it.”
Such conversations are online. Capitalism in our country (and from the second call) also did not work out, like socialism. The wooden yoke was changed to iron, but there are no other changes, therefore - we want it or not, it is good or bad - the boys will enter into such discussions inevitably, to seek justice, this is a property of youth and a human property, these are typical characters and situations, they are again in demand and inevitable.
Well, further, on June 6 of last year, a few days after this and other similar correspondence, the most young “terrorists” are taken in Kansk in Kansk in Kansk. The criminal prosecution under the article “Participation in the terrorist community” in March was terminated for the absence of all three of the crime in the actions of all three corpus delicti, but there was a charge of “undergoing training in order to carry out terrorist activities”. This article, 205.3, is to the lifelong to adults, and adolescents are shining maximum - up to 10 years. In addition, they are charged with three crimes under Part 2 of Art. 222.1 (storage and wearing of explosives and explosive devices committed by a group of persons by prior conspiracy) and four crimes under Part 2 of Art. 223.1 (the manufacture of explosives and explosive devices is also a group, by conspiracy).
And in March S.G. The Kansk was an order to interrogate Nikita from the Altai SK. And look at the wording: “During the preliminary investigation, it was found that * [ key witness ] in the period from 05/13/2020 to 08/08/2020 [ that is, just at the moment when he entered into correspondence with Nikita and shared his plans to set fire to the field or shoot from pneumatics in the field of the vanity of the vanity of the vanity, possessed a reliable. information that Narov N.A. adheres to the ideology of anarchism and has the goal of changing the state and political system existing in the Russian Federation ”, etc. - The conceivable and inconceivable crimes attributed to Uvarov, which his interlocutor, according to the UK, “reliably” knew about.
And further from the same document, with the preservation of spelling and stylistics of the bodies: “Realizing the negative consequences in the form of the impossibility of adopting measures by authorized authorities aimed at suppressing N.A. Uvarov crimes under Art. 205.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, * [ key witness ] did not report to the authorities. "
Once again (follow your hands): June 6, Kansky guys were detained. After receiving primary information on June 8, the case was opened. And the Altai teenager (based on the text of a separate assignment) all this time - when the Kansk investigators did not know what to sew, which article - already had reliable knowledge that it was 205.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. And - did not report.
How did it turn out that he was already found guilty and condemned for this? He himself told about this - during the court hearing in Kansk, a video conference with the Barnaul garrison military court was organized for the interrogation of the key witness.
From the interrogation of a witness by lawyer Anton Kolosov:
“You said that Uvarov wanted to undermine the police car, and explosives made explosives to undermine the building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, right?” - "Yes." “Did he tell you about his goal?” “No, I didn’t say it.” “Tell me, you explained that he made explosives for sabotage - is this your opinion or did he tell you?” - "I did not say, but in terms of the content of the text I made such a conclusion."
Even from the interrogation - now the state -owned man asks questions in the process: "... what did you understand?" “What does he [ Uvarov ] make for some further sabotage.” “Why couldn't you do a sabotage right away?” Why did you have to send a video to you? " - "Don't know".
The petition of the lawyer Vladimir Vasin, who defends Uvarov, to introduce a copy of the order from the Altai Squc forces to the case, proving that the key witness was “dependent, was under investigation and worked with the FSB officers, which means that his testimony should be skeptical”, the court rejected.