
What is the difference between a public wish from the scene from toast at the table? At least by the fact that the protruding from the stage is usually sober and approximately understands what he says. Suppose, the chairman of the City Duma of Kamensk-Uralsky Valery Permyakov, somewhere in a feast, would have risen with a glass in his hand and would wish some of our enemies to die. So for this matter, everything would immediately be drank and bite. No one would clarify who specifically means in mind. They drink from us equally soon and confident - what's “for”, that “against”.
But Valery Ivanovich, even before the New Year's feast, was brought to the stage of the Park Park, where he took the microphone and on duty, as well as sincerely and sincerely congratulated the townspeople on the holiday. He congratulated and finished his speech as follows: “For a pipe company, for the city of Kamensk-Uralsky, for us, dear friends, two short and one with love-gip-gip-ura! Let everyone who goes against us die . ”
Well, why is it so straight, in a party? Or even tougher than in a party. Even in the local branch of United Russia, they winced and appreciated the performance of their nominee Permyakov as excessively emotional. And indeed, it would be more delicate.
It is not necessary to die directly to some opponents to die. You can, for example, wish them to be treated in our clinics and feldsher-obstetric points.
Both kindly, and the same goal is clearly outlined.
In general, the wishes of death, even indirectly, would be better to avoid. The Ural speaker could wish those who are against us, raising the retirement age in their countries. Let them live, but do not rest. At the same time, they would have wished them the increase in products for products that each dollar from the shelves be considered. The housing and communal services there would have let them into them - he would have wished to raise tariffs, and then electricity, gas and a warm current of the Gulf Stream would be turned off for non -payment. You never know how it was possible to make fun of people, so not - without imagination he wished to die. And all this, as it turned out, is due to excessive patriotism. Indeed, in the city administration, the words of Permyakov explained easily and convincingly: "He is just a patriotic and emotional person." Such, they say, sharply continental Ural-patriotism.
With patriotism, everything is in order with us, but at the same time everyone wants to give an example to the restraint of our president, who never calls potential opponents enemies. Only partners. After his performances, even a well -known proverb I want to reinterpret: "You will eat breakfast yourself, share lunch with a friend, and give dinner to the partner."
True, on an international scale there is almost no one to divide lunch. And another saying: “Do not have a hundred rubles, but have a hundred friends” - it sounds quite hopeless. In fact, only one friend remained, who every now and then asks us a hundred rubles.
And the speakers, more responsible than that, Ural, with any opportunity convince us that Russia is in the ring of partners.