
For "no “War!” Vinty is hard. It is curious, will they winger for “yes to the world!”?
In general, for some time it is already extremely clear: there is no difference what you wrote there, even if nothing-just a clean sheet-will still vinte.
And here I generally cease to understand anything-if the task is to winger people, is it not easier not to tie this procedure at all to any reason, but simply to winger preventively?
After all, the goal is to intimidate, right? What is the point of producing and trying to pretend that this is not so?
But nothing will frighten nothing more than simple planned detention!
Just install some kind of coefficient tied to the population ... For example, 10 thousand people are twisting to a city every day. In a millionaire-a honeycomb. In Moscow, a thousand. Ordinary passers -by. After all, we will not deny that everyone does not have, no, and the seditious thoughts of disagreement with something run, and after the detention the Golden rule of Zhelov comes into force: there is no punishment without guilt.
At least, such a system will introduce certain clarity, the population will be afraid of the desired condition, and the work of all services will normalize and will not be chaotic and unpredictable, everyone will calm down-everyone will know that every day the sun rises and a certain number of people.
There are no risks - fear will be in abundance, but more order. When you need to throw the population again ... Well, there, to raise the retirement age, arrange the amendments, arrange the war - we increase the coefficient by 10 times and we’ll twist a week according to the increased norm, and after that we declare the people, we’ll come up with - in the week of Vincelov they will already have time to understand and get used to the fact that the new decree will be tough and the courage to transfer the news is worthy and patient.
Some advantages, in short, in the planned Windolov. It remains the deputy to find who will introduce the bill.
Vyacheslav Chernov - entrepreneur, Tashtagol
The "Opinion" expressed in the heading of the point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial office