Prochrevsky telegram channels published an interview with Marianne Vysoshemier-one of the heroines of a report from a fired maternity hospital in Mariupol

Her words are presented as a confirmation of the version of the Russian authorities (but this is very doubtful)

In Russian telegram channels, a seven-minute video interview with Marianna Vysoshemier appeared. This is one of the women who was in the maternity hospital of Mariupol during the shelling on March 9, she became the heroine of the resonant reporting of the Associated Press. The video, as Mediazona drew attention , in particular, published by PMC Media and other channels that support the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In these publications, the words of the Vysoshemierskaya are presented as a confirmation of the version of the Russian authorities that the maternity hospital allegedly “hit the Armed Forces of Ukraine” (Armed Forces) and “Ukrainian militants”. At the same time, the girl herself does not actually claim this - at least in the published videos.

It is unclear from the video when, where, and under what circumstances, people who interviewed, talked with the Vischera. In the frame, the girl sits on the couch, leaning against the pillow, against the background of the beige wall. The recording has several mounting speakers.

Vysoshemierskaya said that before the war she lived in Makeevka (Donetsk region of Ukraine, since 2014 this city has been controlled by a self-proclaimed DPR), and after marriage, in 2020, she moved to Mariupol. According to her, on March 6, 2022, she and her husband came to the “third maternity hospital”, “because there was nowhere else to go”: the “second maternity hospital” did not accept the patients, and “the first”, according to the Vischemer, “occupied the military”; She did not specify which military are talking about. Earlier, the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, noted the Mariupol, noted the Mariupol maternity hospital, noted the Mediazona (at the same time, Russia at first claimed that it was the Russian maternity hospital and the Russian troops were shelled - although in reality the blows were inflicted on the maternity hospital No. 3; then the propaganda proposed that the foal of the maternity hospital was a production).

Husbands of women in labor and pregnant women, a blogger said, “lived in the basement” of the hospital. They prepared women with food in the field kitchen in the yard. “Military,” said the Vesmmiere, did not help the maternity hospital; Once, they, according to her, came and took the food, explaining that they did not eat anything for five days.

Marianna Vysoshemier (hereinafter it purifies - comments "Medusa"):

When an explosion occurred, everything was calm, it was March 9 ... ( installation gluing. ) There were no shots, we calmly slept at night ( the airlines for the maternity hospital happened during the day ). And then March 9. ( Gluing. ) We sat discussing Malyuk packages , that’s what was inside, and we heard the shell thundered. Then I personally threw up the blanket instinctively, and [we] heard the second shell. ( Gluing. ) I [that is, in me] partially hit the glass, a little cut my nose, under the lip and above. But it was insignificant ...

( Gluing. ) Already the second explosion thundered, we ... ( gluing. ) We went out, we were evacuated to the basement. ( Gluing. ) Then we began to discuss whether the air raid was ... ( gluing. ) We said that there was no air raid. That is, our opinion was confirmed that we did not hear. They ( who are unclear ) did not hear either. They said that it flew a shell.

According to the girl, there were “two explosions” that day (that the maternity hospital was injured from two aircraft shows was told by the Ukrainian authorities of Mariupol and journalists who were nearby). After them-within five to ten minutes-the "military" came and announced the evacuation. Vesmmoire was the last. At some point, the Vysoshemirskaya noticed the “military man in the helmet”, who had “something fluffy” in her hands-she realized that he was “taking off” (reporters also wear armor and helmets; sometimes they almost do not differ from those for the military). Vesmmiere asked him to stop, because "I did not want to glow anywhere."

Later, the girl ran into a man who shot her, once again - “on the ground floor” of the maternity hospital (at first she calls him “the military in the helmet”, and then says “the same reporter”). Then he, according to her, began to shoot her again:

Already the guys ( which are not specified ) this time began to say that do not take off. He began to ignore. They repeated him again, and he left. ( Gluing. ) My husband seemed to look at them better, because they ( apparently, journalists ) came the next day. He said: "Associated Press." (It is known that the journalist Mstislav Chernov was shot in the hospital in the maternity hospital; the pictures and stories of Chernov and photographer Evgeny the youngster became the most important evidence of the siege of Mariupol; they have never been refuted by anyone - however, Russian propaganda insists that the episode with the maternity hospital does not correspond to reality, giving conflicting versions; to other pictures and evidence Do not pay attention.

Then the Vysoshemiersky concludes that the journalists “appeared right away” after the wake of the maternity hospital. The blogger denies the version that Russian propagandists distributed that she was depicted in all the pictures and videos from the maternity hospital: “They said that I was lying on a couch with a blanket, in another clothes ... It wasn’t me, it was a girl who died ... It wasn’t me, they didn’t change my clothes, they didn’t make me up.” (The day after the shelling of the maternity hospital in Mariupol, March 10, the Russian Gazeta State News published “The next fake of the West: the woman shot in the Mariupol maternity hospital turned out to be a fashion model in makeup”; it said that the beauty blogger Marianne “played the roles of several births” in the “staged shooting from the hospital”.)

After that, the Vysoshcheirskaya again talks about journalists, who, she believes, were near the hospital “12 minutes later” after the explosions. “We saw smoke rising over the maternity hospital. When we ended up there, rescuers still pulled out bloodied pregnant women out of ruins, ”Chernov told about it (for several days before the wiggings, they shot what was happening in the hospitals of Mariupol).

Later, says the Vysoshemir, it was again visited by journalists and asked to tell about what had happened. However, she did not find her interview, where she says that “there was no air raid” on the network.

Immediately after the interview, Vsuchemierskaya spoke about the shelling of the hospital on Instagram. She is unhappy that her photo was used without permission

On the evening of April 1, Marianna Vysoshemierskaya published several storiz on Instagram, where she commented on what happened in Mariupol. In one video, they were collected by Varlamov News telegram channel.

In general, she repeated everything she said in an interview - but more harmoniously. Vesmmiyrskaya again emphasized that "there was definitely no air raid." At the same time, she noted that it was not clear how the shelling of the hospital took place.

She explained that pregnant women and women in labor were on the first and second floors, as well as in the basement, where everyone was evacuated “after the incident” (apparently, after the first impact on the maternity hospital). From the basement, according to her, women began to leave “literally five minutes later”, and she spent there “another thirty minutes” there.

After the evacuation, the girl went outside and asked the Ukrainian policemen to be held in the ward - for things. According to Vysoshemier, she refused the journalist Associated Press to shoot.

I did not give any consent in the photo and publication. That is, they published all this on their own initiative of their own ... March 11 [two days after the shelling of the maternity hospital] they [Associated Press journalists] came and asked me for an interview. To which I replied that I was apolitical and I do not want to give any interview. They said: "We are also apolitical, but we published your photo on the Internet, and an information attack began ..."

Therefore, based on the current situation in which they picked me up, because I did not give any consent to the publication of my photos - I had to comment, because this situation was considered fake, that there was nobody in the hospital. I commented that there were women in labor and pregnant women in the hospital ... They also asked if there was an air raid. I replied that no one heard the air raid. That is, the blows of the blows, and there were no accompanying sounds either before or after these blows.

Apparently, this information did not quite suit them. They cut it out ( how does she know about it, it is unknown; in an interview, Vysoshcherskaya says that she did not find this interview on the network ). That is, they cut absolutely everything, except that - when it happened and that we were in the hospital. No one else took any interview, no comments, nothing. And because of such inaction, such a confusion turned out. ( AP on March 12 released a note of youngsters and Chernov that the Vyshemirian gave birth to a daughter. In which there are her fresh pictures. )

Vesmmiere also explained why she had not got in touch before (apparently with instagram subscribers; the last post in her account dates from February 28). According to her, where she was until recently, there was no electricity and the Internet. Where exactly she was, the girl did not report. “And when we were already evacuated, there was no network either. There wasn’t even a call there at all, ”said Vesmmiere, without specifying where she was now. Whether she managed to leave Mariupol is not exactly known.

The journalist, who called the author of the interview, issued reports from Novorossia and Syria, and also covered the Reginums case in Belarus

Russian military commissar Kristina Melnikova said that it was she and her unnamed colleague talked with the Vyshemir. Melnikova promised to publish a full version of the video soon.

Facebook Melnikova states that the journalist worked in the Prochrevsky publication of REGNUM, and now she is a correspondent of another Prochrevsky media - Eadaily agency. The latter’s website says that Melnikova studied at a political scientist and political journalist at the Ryazan State University and the Moscow State Humanitarian University - and after the start of the war in the Donbass, she took up military journalism. In the Profile Melnikova, Eadaily reports that she is the author of "numerous front -line reports from Novorossia, as well as a number of materials from Syria."

Among the high -profile problems that Kristina Melnikova wrote about, the trial of pro -Russian publicists in Belarus can be distinguished, where she turned out to be the only correspondent from Russia, as well as the cases of militias sentenced to deportation, who, as a result of timely information lighting and attracting attention of society, were able to avoid issuing to Ukraine and legalize in Russia.

Judging by the telegram channel of the journalist, she also collaborates with the Prochrevsky media Shot. Among other things, Melnikova took off the plot of a family of refugees from Mariupol for this publication.

Updated . On the evening of April 2, a complete 24-minute version of the interview was published on the Yetyub channel of the blogger Denis Seleznev. Kristina Melnikova specified that Seleznev asked questions, and she shot it on the video. In the full version, the Vesmmiere says that during the attack on the maternity hospital there was no “aircraft”, and also admits that the destruction of the drama theater in Mariupol could be a provocation. At the end of the conversation, the Vescherarian asks the President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky “somehow to agree” and “look for some compromises” in order to achieve the end of the war. From a full video, it is still not clear where and when it was recorded and where the woman is now.