Discreditation of linguistics

Another non -core specialist offers his services to security forces

The examination in the case of St. Petersburg deputy Shishlov on discrediting the Russian army was carried out by a non-professional. The disserter publishes a complete review of this “research”.

Associate Professor Veronika Abakanova works in the RSPU named after A.I. Herzen. Here it would be possible to put an end to, recalling the outstanding role of the RSPU in domestic dishes - there were a member of the CEC Nikolai Bulaev and the son of Zhirinovsky Igor Lebedev. In total , the employees of the RSPU are involved in 85 cases of plagiarism, dissodelia and other violations of publication ethics.

But everything is much more interesting. Veronika Abakanova is a lawyer. She did not have enough stars from the sky (over 20 years of scientific activity, her Hirsch index in journal publications excluding self -cycling was 3), but her career impresses consistent and solid.

Her dissertation “Forensic characteristics and a general typical program of the study of the event with signs of legalization (laundering) of funds or other property acquired by other persons by criminal means” is not listed in the base of the disserter.

After the defense, she continued to deal with this topic: among hundreds of scientific works published by her, more than 30 are devoted to various aspects of money laundering. According to the manuals, programs and the like published by her, she taught forensics or related subjects, for example, devoted to investigating crimes in the field of economic activity.

Another scientific interest in Abakanova’s associate professor in jurisprudence, judging by the names of her articles, there were venal crimes - that is, the crimes of medical workers committed during professional activities (I do not go into the analysis of her work on this topic on the merits, but simply fix the fact of scientific interest). The associate professor Abakanova and the procedural side of forensics were interested - ensuring evidence, testing the testimony and the like that was reflected in the headings of the articles.

Yes, in the dissertation council D 212.19.14, the scientific secretary of which was Abakanov, five fake dissertations were protected, but most likely this is a coincidence.

And this, in general, the impeccable career of a modest teacher suddenly turns into something strange. Even amazing.

The St. Petersburg Prosecutor's Office needed to justify the administrative protocol for the candidate of physicomatic sciences to deputy Alexander Shishlov for discrediting the Russian army. The reason was his phrases about the refusal to honor Zhirinovsky’s memory: “I believe that the initiative to honor the memory of a politician who has incurred hatred and aggression for many years, pushed to war, is hypocritical and inappropriate ...” - and the phrase that when the St. George’s tape “is folded by the letter Z - does this not defile a folk symbol and does not discredit it?” A request was sent to the RSPU named after Herzen - about the "negative image of the armed forces" and "discrediting."

There are philologists in this university. But for some reason, it was precisely the assistant professor of criminal law (or-only an assistant professor of criminal law?) Agreed to fulfill the wishes of the prosecutor's office.

Especially not wise and not addressing the dictionaries, the lawyer Abakanov gives a philological “analysis” of the meaning of the word “discredit” and immediately repels his analysis to deputy Shishlov. Immediately - about the "negative image" and the "negative assessment." Without details, without arguments-apparently, exclusively by the authority of an expert philologist, infallibly broadcasting ex Cathedra. In passing, the author acts as an expert on the new media, referring to the popularity of the VKontakte network.

As noted in his review of this study (with which you can also get acquainted in the Dissernet library of dubious examinations and reviews of them) candidate of historical sciences Dmitry Dubrovsky, “... the author who has no philological education does not use any methodology. Instead

The entire text of the “analysis” is a two-page free retelling of controversial texts, abounding with stretchs and speculations that are not based on any scientific methodology.

Thus, the subjective conclusion is the conclusion that the doubt about the legitimacy of the use of the St. George’s tape in agitation for “Svo”, which the author of the controversial text defines as “a symbol of popular gratitude and memory in relation to those who defended our life and freedom in the Great Patriotic War”, supposedly “discredits the army”. ”

Dmitry Dubrovsky also indicated in the review that "the expert claims that there is a direct connection between doubt that the St. George tape is appropriate to use in the form of Z, and" trust in the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in order to protect the interests of the Russian Federation and its citizens. " This conclusion is not based on anything other than subjective speculation. ”

So another “scientist without a face” has become more, and in the company of the Lord Kryukova and Tarasov, Mikheev , Korshikov , Belov and Batov, another colleague close in spirit appeared.