
For a search to Olesa, the security forces came with a sledgehammer. On December 26, early in the morning in the apartment, where a 19-year-old student lived with her husband, police broke and laid Krivtsova with her husband on the floor. One of the police officers, as the girl later told reporters, allegedly stated that "Sledgehammer - Hello from the PMC" Wagner "." And the photo from the soldiers of the apartment, the girls, soon manifested in the "patriotic" channels.
Olesya Krivtsova is a wiring at the Arkhangelsk Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Two criminal cases were instituted against her: on December 13 - about the “discrediting of the Russian army”, two weeks later, on the day of the search - about “justification of terrorism”. They are based on pacifist posts in social networks: Storis on Instagram and texts in closed telegram chatting classes. One of these texts is the repost of the publication of the emigrated activist Ilya Leshukov about how students of the SAF of the university went to the rally in support of the referendum on the accession of Ukrainian territories to Russia.

The impetus was a denunciation: correspondence in a student chat surfaced in the media, where future historians actively discussed where to convey to Krivtsov - to the police or immediately to the FSB. We agreed on the second option. One of the students (their names are hidden under nicknames) replied: "Donation - the duty of the patriot." And he suggested seasoning the case of half the girl.
Harming was not long in coming: on the day of the first hearing, two nights in front of which Krivtsova held in the IVS, Timur Bulatov (aka Isaev) joined the story. Since 2008, this person has terrorizes a variety of people in social networks, sending denunciations to law enforcement agencies-to those who seemed to him LGBT Persona-as well as looking for and sending to the police photos of certain, in his opinion, dressed Russians against the background of temples: this is usually enough to initiate cases of insulting the feelings of believers. The most famous “feat” of Bulatova-Isaeva is a criminal case against the artist Julia Tsvetkova, who was preceded by Stalking in Bulatovsky. Recall that in the end the court acquitted Julia, but nothing is known about conducting an audit on the fact of a knowingly false denunciation.
On the day the prosecutor's office demanded that Olesya Krivtsov be placed in custody,
Bulatov wrote that things against the girl were excited "after his timely signal in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the CPE to colleagues from Arkhangelsk."
The Klyaznik clearly refers to the center for countering extremism of the Arkhangelsk Ministry of Internal Affairs, but for some reason the name of the structure of “colleagues” writes incorrectly. It is also not mentioned in the case file, so it is possible that on a potentially loud business it simply makes an advertisement - as he himself understands it. And continues to write nasty things about the student.
Krivtsova found out that one of the classmates merges correspondence with Olesya security forces in May. Then the girl was fined 30 thousand rubles for sticking on Lenin Square Leaflets that veterans of the Great Patriotic War also live in Ukraine. This police considered this army discrediting, and it was the presence of an administrative protocol under this article that gave the security forces the opportunity to institute criminal proceedings against Krivtsova. During the May survey in the police, Olesya noticed a printout of the correspondence with her one of the students on the interrogator's table. Subsequently, this student replied to her questions that he did not know how the materials got to the police. Also, during the hearing to choose a preventive measure, it became known that Olesya’s telephone conversations were earlier.
Before the trial of December 28, Olesya held on. And in the cage she cried - when she heard that the prosecutor demanded to send her for two months.
The foundation - Krivtsova allegedly threatened the witness, student of the East Faces Safu Roman Huseyn. In addition, the investigation did not like that Krivtsova was registered with her father in Belgorod, and in Severodvinsk, in her mother’s apartment, which guaranteed that the girl would live with her during the investigation, there is the Internet.

In the meeting, the testimony of the student Vladislav Sergeyev also appeared, according to whom Olesya allegedly gathered, if someone reports to her, to leave the country. The pages of both witnesses are currently closed, it is impossible to contact them.
They introduced to the case and the characterization of Krivtsov, signed by the director of the Higher School of Social and Humanities and International Communication, SAFU Artyom Makulin: “Motivation to study low, there are debts, there are often missing classes, there is no interest in the profession. Uses protection tactics by any means. ” For the first time in the media field, Makulin appeared when in March he refused to sign a statement that emigrated after the searches of the Sota correspondent, Daria of the Otradina on the passing of the last final exam in remote mode: due to the inability to appear at the State Daria, which went to the red diploma, subsequently expelled. In the same month, he spoke at the conference “Patriotism. Law and order. Public Security ”, which took place on the initiative of the Regional Political Council of United Russia and, according to the organizers, the goal was “ consolidating the healthy forces of society, state institutions in the face of threats from the West in connection with a special military operation ”. In the report, Makulin spoke of a preventive weapon for the forces of the West, which Russia has given since the time of Peter the Great and now "finally enters the right field of activity."
The teaching staff of the university, where Olesya Krivtsova is studying, appears in the case more than once. It was in the bowels of the SAFU that an expert opinion was born regarding the presence of signs of extremism in her story.
The defense, however, at first managed to recapture the arguments of the prosecutor's office: the court appointed Olesa a ban on certain actions - it was impossible to receive and send mail, use the Internet and phone, except for the academic necessity. However, on January 3, the student was again detained right on the street. The next day, she again ended up in court - and the prosecutor again demanded to send her to a pre -trial detention center. The argument-December 30, the girl was put on the wanted list due to the fact that she was supposedly not found in the village of Umsk, where she lived before the first detention. At the same time, Krivtsova had no ban on leaving the house or the obligation to be in Uemsky, and when choosing a preventive measure, it was noted that the suspect was planning to live with his mother in Severodvinsk.
According to the investigator, on January 3, the tickets were taken in the name of the border of the Russian Federation (Isacco-St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg-Pskov, Arkhangelsk-Moscow, Moscow-Vladikavkaz).
The mother of the detainee on the eve told the activists that in the name of Olesya supposedly-from the words of the same investigator-tickets were taken to Perm and Kazan. At the same time, Krivtsova’s Russian passport is invalid, that is, in any case, she could not use them.
Note that this is not the first time when tickets or simply reservations of those in the name of the suspect arose unexpectedly for him in cases where the investigation did not get other arguments for detention. For example, the ex-director of the Far Eastern Institute of Marine Technologies, Alexander Shcherbatyuk, who spent half a year on suspicion of using official powers contrary to the interests of the service, was detained after a booked ticket to Belarus was discovered in his name. The defense insisted that the professor himself was not going to buy any tickets.
The petition of the lawyer Olesya Krivtsova Alexei Kychin about the request from Russian Railways information on where, when and by whom the indicated tickets were purchased, the protocol of the last court hearing was acquired, where it was discussed that Olesya would live in Severodvinsk with her mother, and the interrogation of a “secret” witness who allegedly informed the girl’s intention, were rejected.
The court, however, made a compromise decision and decided to place Krivtsov under house arrest.