Hatred of freedom

The popular in certain circles Archpriest Andrei Tkachev reports:

“What, in particular, is a good monarchy in comparison with the“ cattle yard ”that is called democracy? Many. For example, the lack of a political struggle in the already familiar sense. The usual I call the fight of wallets and black PR against the background of the most primitive phraseology.

An endless series of elections is an endless series of chatter, streams of compromises, mouse fuss of some unheard of geeks, multiplying exponentially. This is the dulling of the voter in order to lightly manipulate his consciousness. This is some kind of antisecalization that takes human specimens from the bottom every time the previous ones.

Actually entropy or the process of accelerated decay of the human masses, formed as a political process, is democracy.

Only a person who is underdeveloped as a person, prone to suicide (for universal death with democracy, gains visible features), or an immoral type that strives for power, can love her. This type is simply clear that in other formations a gallows awaits him, and only in democracy is there a chance to get upstairs.

The word "democracy" itself does not specifically mean anything in the political science. Behind this term is hiding something. But in the life sense, it means "a holiday of villains", climbing power on the heads.

The police protects the layman from the thumbnails at the station. The same role, only in a much higher sense, is played by the monarchy. She protects the soul of the layman from talking crooks, offering different concepts of "eternal bliss."

The very tendency to represent "democracy" as something non -alternative and inevitable smells of a conspiracy. This idea of ​​the inevitability of democracy and its superiority over other formations is simply a "scheme", totalitarianly planted on a planet scale. "

For some reason, it is not specified that liberal democracy is a corrupt girl of imperialism. This is a serious omission.