A person without status

The first witness appeared in the case of the murder of military commander of the Tatarsky

Dmitry Kasintsev, who, after the explosion in the Street Bar, hid the suspect Daria Trepova, officially received the status of a witness in the case of a terrorist attack on the murder of military commander Vladlen Tatarsky. This was reported this morning by some media and telegram channels without links to sources.

Meanwhile, in the IC of the Russian Federation, this fact was not confirmed on April 6. As the employees of the press service of the department told us:

“Everything that is published on our website is currently a maximum of publicly available information on the case” ( the latest messages here that Trepova was charged with a terrorist attack and murder, and she was sent in a pre -trial detention center ).

In addition, the press service of the IC of the Russian Federation refused to answer the question “New”, whether there are official witnesses in the case today. And this is important, because on the night of April 3 in an apartment in a suburb of St. Petersburg, mother and stepfather Trepova were also detained. Neither their fate nor statuses in the criminal case are still clear.

27-year-old Dmitry Kasintsev, according to social networks, was born in Ussuriysk, moved to Petersburg in 2016. He graduated from ITMO University. He lived with his mother in an apartment in the Vyborg district of the city. Recently he worked as a programmer.

As you know, the “new” of official sources, the security forces Dmitry Kasintsev detained the apartment in the apartment at the same time as Daria Trepova on April 3. Both were immediately taken away for interrogation. Theoretically, under such circumstances, it can be assumed that Kasintseva, having interrogated, was also detained in accordance with Art. 91 Code of Criminal Procedure.

Then the temporary silence of the investigation can be explained by the fact that now it makes no sense to publicly declare Kasintsev a “witness”, because in the near future his status may change on another.

On April 4, the content of the first interrogation Dmitry Kasintsev revealed the Shot Telegram channel ( more than 600 thousand subscribers ), setting it out in several theses:

“ - when he agreed to her ( Daria . - N.P. ) Arrival in the apartment, he ( Dmitry . - N.P. ) allegedly did not know about her involvement in the explosion.

- About what happened, Trepova told him allegedly only two hours after arrival.

- Dmitry was very scared, realizing that he could be attracted for aiding, so he began to collect his things and documents - he was preparing to run along with Trepova.

“The man claims that he is not at all involved in Trepova’s affairs.”

This interrogation of Kasintsev, declaring him the “first witness” on a high -profile case, today was quoted by St. Petersburg publications that are part of the Izvestia and National Media Group MIC project.

We also note that the same Shot telegram channel at about 15 hours on April 3 posted a video of the detention of Kasintsev (it was not published anywhere else, including on the website of the IC of the Russian Federation). On these frames, a man in handcuffs leads to the car. He is silent and does not answer the questions of Shot correspondents running to him (as they call themselves).

Recall, on April 3, in the Basmanny Court of Moscow, a meeting on the election of a preventive measure Daria Trepova was declared closed precisely “because of the disclosure of the preliminary investigation in the media” (then they reproached the Petersburg edition of Fontanka, which quickly laid out theses of the first interrogation of Daria Trepova). As we see today, these investigations continue to be disclosed ( and with the full connivance of the operatives. - Ed. ). And this causes resonance.

So, on the morning of April 5, threats from unknown began to act users of social networks signed on the accounts of Daria Trepova or at least somehow connected with her. According to the Petersburg telegram channel Rotonda, those St. Petersburg activists were attacked, whose data was published in groups devoted to the “investigation” of the case of an explosion in a cafe on the university embankment.

Femininist Elena Kondrakhina told Rotond that she was attacked by bots after she asked a question in a chat of volunteers about the possibility of making a trepy transmission in a pre -trial detention center. Now the anonyms are everywhere publishing the girl’s home address, they threaten to “put on a bottle” and “meet ***** all relatives”. Kondrakhina emphasizes that she has never been familiar with the accused or signed for her somewhere.

Today, this is only one of the cases in St. Petersburg, devotee. Not all the unknown threats are in a hurry to reveal their names.

But hearing the answer to the main question becomes even more important: who and why do you need such a resonance?