Take -up and falling Churchill

The telegram channel "Steel helmet" writes about how the conservatives won, and then lost to the lab anomes:

“Winston Churchill had a long -term and exciting political career. He became deputy minister in the year 31 in 1905, the minister - at 33 years old in 1908. Churchill spent the next twenty years with short interruptions in ministerial seats, jumping between parties: either from conservatives to liberals, then back.

<...> In 1929, the conservatives lost the elections to the Laborists, and Churchill lost his chair, and soon quarreled with the leadership of his own party and even left the shadow cabinet. <...>

Cumbek happened at the beginning of World War II. Churchill as a man who warned of the Hitler threat even when it was not a mainstream, at first he was appointed to his old post of the First World War - the First Lord of the Admiralty. And in May 1940, a revolution of <...> took place inside the conservative party. According to the results of backstage negotiations, George VI instructed Churchill to form a coalition multi -party government, which he did.

The National Coalition successfully led the country during the war and led it to victory over Germany in May 1945. Immediately after that, both leading parties - conservatives and the Labor - agreed to hold new elections <...>, without waiting for the victory over Japan.

Conservatives hoped to leave at the expense of the cult of Churchill's personality as a “national leader” who won the war. The pre -election posters called for "helping him to finish the work." <...> They spoke little about domestic politics. They promised some vague reforms, but it was difficult to understand what kind of reforms they would be.

But the Labor, on the contrary, focused on domestic policy. In their pre-election manifesto “Let's look into the future without fear”, they promised to launch a program of large-scale socio-economic reforms: to conduct the nationalization of the Central Bank, heavy and mining industry, to massively build new housing, to expand the system of social insurance and state education, to create a universal system of state health. On the Labor Plants, images of soldiers showed up with an appeal “help them to finish their work”, that is, to provide veterans with a decent life for which they fought at the front. <...>

Most of the British social reforms within the country were more important than geopolitics and imperial greatness. The Laborists received 48% of the vote and took 393 places in the House of Commons, while the conservatives were content with only 36% and 197 places. The 1945 elections became one of the most devastated defeats of the conservative party in its entire history.

The Labor ruled Britain from 1945 to 1951. And during this time they created here the “state of universal well -being” promised by them with all its pros and cons. "