Who to become a stump

Styan Yenssen (left) and Jens Stoltenberg

From the editorial office

The head of the apparatus of the Secretary General of NATO Styan Jensen disavowed his own words about the possible exchange of Ukrainian territories for membership in the alliance. The scandalous statement was made in the context of discussing the scenarios of the end of the war - in an unofficial setting, with proper reservations about the fact that the decision belongs to Ukraine. But it sounded from the mouth of the closest assistant to the NATO Secretary General, and not an ordinary defeator from among experts.

There are no illusions: the notorious "scenario" is still discussed as possible, the "party of Chamberlain" does not give up. A noticeable part of the Western establishment is ready to allow the Russian terrorist regime to snatch a piece of Ukraine.

How many correct words have already been said that the formula "Earth in exchange for peace" means defeat, catastrophe, shame and continuation of the war. In a year and a half, all arguments are cast in granite. The idea of ​​exchanging does not withstand any criticism from the moral, neither legal, nor from a pragmatic point of view. It is most absurd, blasphemous, destructive for the world order, international law, the reputation of the Western Alliance, and murderous for those who are now in hostage by Russian occupiers. In fact, this is a validation of genocide. No agreements with Putin are impossible, and no agreements will quench the appetites of the Russian Federation. Each centimeter of Ukraine should be dected. Any alternatives to a full Ukrainian victory are the global success of terrorists.

But even a day does not pass so that one of the prominent Western politicians or experts does not belp the next portion of toxic peacekeeping rhetoric. In many ways, this is the result of many years of Russian efforts to create networks in Europe and the USA. Of course, not everyone does it with such shamelessness as the odious Nicolas Sarkozy: in yesterday’s interview with Le Figaro, the ex-president of France issued a full set of anti-Ukrainian theses, being personally guilty of conspiracy with the aggressor and receiving large cash handouts from him.

Of course, the main question is - what are the layouts in Washington. The representative of the White House John Kirby, commenting on the last briefing formula “NATO membership in exchange for territorial concessions”, grinned and assured that nothing like this was discussed, and all efforts were concentrated on Ukraine’s help. However, the fact that Washington is still afraid of the complete defeat of the Putin army is evidenced not only by numerous leaks, but also by the real state of affairs with the supply of long -range missiles and fighters. Harry Kasparov directly accuses the Baydenov administration of betrayal of Ukraine and his own national interests - backstage negotiations with Putin and inhibition of weapons.

The outlined success of the Armed Forces on the Southern Front should deliver a powerful blow to the "scribe" camp.

However, the successes of dectication will not stop the destruction of Ukraine from the air. And if a full -fledged membership in NATO is possible only after the complete expulsion of the invaders, then the only way to stop the Russian missile terror - Anglo -American guarantees of security for the unoccupied part of Ukraine. From the Vilnius summit they expected something like that. Such guarantees, of course, would be fixed by temporary territorial losses - but without an agreement with the aggressor and with an obligation to restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine.

Tug the rope between Churchill and Chamberlain continues. Fear of "defeat and collapse of the Russian Federation" remains a powerful factor in Western policy. As it turned out, the natural disintegration of Russia is more frightened by the violent dismemberment of Ukraine. And for some reason, it was Ukraine who are ready to imagine these respected people in the form of a state-owned state, and not Russia -after everything that it did with her and foreign peoples.