Translated material
From "Mutaborstsy" to "Westings"
Another area was discovered, not taken under control - this is a philosophy. The struggle for its "sovereignty" begins - said NT Columonist Andrey Kolesnikov*
In imitation of a great power that equates its “special operation” with the Great Patriotic War, claiming power at the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences-and this is the basic motive of their activity-the Zinovievites equate the cheeling of Alexander Zinoviev in Soviet times with the dismissal of the young “soil-based philosopher” Anatoly Chernyaev from this academic institution in 2021 (he spent a very short time at a very short time The director of the director). That phase of the struggle for power in Ifran ended with a forced return to the institute for post and. O. Director of a compromise and respected figure - academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Abdusalam Huseynov. It is difficult to suspect him in the fundamental “Western worship”, as well as many others who have not yet gone abroad and the employees of the institute in Russia. However, the nature of the accusations in the Putin regime is becoming more and more exotic. If, for example, in a second examination in the Berkovich-Petrichuk case, their play is charged with a “negative characteristic of Russian men”, then the “Zinovievites” who arranged their press conference in the state agency of TASS are accusing the institution that employees of the institute are engaged in “philosophy against the war”. This definition belongs to Leonid Polyakov from the Higher School, who has long occupied the ultra -conservative philosopher in power attractive from the point of view of political marketing. In the Institute of Philosophy, in his opinion, there were no truly Russian philosophers, the only Chernyaev was the only one who could not take power the first time. And this he speaks of his colleagues, whose professionalism is well known to him. About philosophers who have conducted serious scientific, and not ideological seminars on the 100th anniversary of Zinoviev, in Ifran. It is necessary to engage in "philosophy for the war", now is not the time for neutral "philosophers during the war."
The press conference in TASS began with the fighting appeal of the widow of Alexander Zinoviev Olga Zinovieva to all healthy forces, including the main philosophical body, the Investigative Committee, and separately to the president. Everything was tougher here than that of the refined Polyakov: “Russian philosophy in danger!”; “The Institute of Philosophy is the refuge of villains, traitors, foreign agents, Russophobes, extremists”; “Western headquarters of ideological invasion of Russia”; “Werewolves in academic mantles”; "Satanic bacchanalia of enemy agents"; "The institute must be prone to denacing." Well, and so on: from Zinoviev-Russian Saint-Exupery to the “philosophical deputies” who “support us”. As it turned out subsequently, such meant a large geophysicist and the head of “Fair Russia” Sergey Mironov - a philosopher, in essence, a beginner, because in absentia he took possession of this specialty in 51. By the way, the deputy Lugovoi, it turns out, is also in some way a philosopher, because he wrote a denunciation for a collection of articles of Russian humanities “in the face of a disaster” and has achieved the ban on the “spread” of this book in Russia. In the denunciation, he used the rich word "narrative".
These are the achievements of sovereigns on the philosophical front - not without the help of a former guard and specialist in tea ceremonies. This is not even the Middle Ages - then philosophers found out relations in open disputes. This is the stylistics of Lydia Timashuk and Vocabular of the late 1940s of the 1950s, the time of the struggle against the "rootless cosmopolitans." We have no other “philosophers” with another vocabulary in TASS - the site was not chosen by chance, probably, to give philosophical intervention the significance of an almost made decision. Moreover, it was not only about stripping the institution of philosophy, but also about the purge of philosophical education.
As the same Zinoviev Alexander Alexandrovich wrote in the "gaping heights", "We go forward, much ahead of our ass." The movement goes back - to the pogrom philosophical “discussions” of the late 1940s, when even the pogroms themselves turned out to be victims of their own initiatives. But then the debate had some kind of subject-in many ways fictitious, but with a discussion of authorities from Hegel to Marx. And now what? Well, the institution of philosophy will be cleaned, well, for example, they will put there to work “uninfunards”, “soils”, fighters with “zestopolonism” - and what will they produce? Marx died - who to rely on? Ilyina? Berdyaeva? Dugina, after all? Or will they take the old and familiar again - criticism of bourgeois exercises? It was from such books that played the role of reviews of literature, inquisitive researchers learned at least something about philosophical and political thought in the West.
I remember that our sovereign once quoted Berdyaev in his speech, although he knew about the same as Brezhnev about him about Marx, and the good part of the biography of the current president took place in the company of comrades who fought with the spread of all kinds of “Beliberdyaevs” - right now, now, Comrade Lugovaya fought with a philosophical collection. But this is not even the point: the support in the “sovereignty” of philosophical knowledge on Russian philosophy is destructive for the “next extent” to the same extent as the appeal of supporters of “special operations” to Russian classical literature, mainly anti -alien and anti -war. Because in almost every significant text of the classics, the same Berdyaev - continuous allusions on the present day, and not in favor of the current Russian regime and its intellectual service, the monopoly within which the Zinovievites claim. In one of his works, Berdyaev supported the resurrection of the Russian spirit in the First World War, but in a clear way was mistaken - all this ended for him and his colleagues with philosophical steamboats and trains to the same West.
But most of all in this story - no matter how it ends - this is what is amazing. The current Russian regime paved all living things, transplanted and squeezed out the entire opposition, drowned out civil society, blocked and banned almost all independent media, came to theaters, in the education system with his textbooks of fictitious history and artificial indocitriting disciplines such as scientific Putinism - “the foundations of Russian statehood”, and removed the unwanted professors, and he went to the school, and he burst into the school, and he burst into the school, and he went to the school. In private life with attempts to bans of abortion, formulated a state ideology based on conspiracy theories, expelled objectionable priests, taught people to hate the West for the fact that there are gender-neutral toilets at every step.
What else do they need? It turns out that for complete happiness they lacked the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Capture it - and finally heal.
* Andrei Kolesnikov, the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation considers the “foreign agent”.
Photo: rfe/rl, centre.einai.ru