Translated material
Wipe posthumously
The police want to ban any mention of Navalny. So far only in Murmansk
Photo: Alexey Dushutin / "New Gazeta"
“A public demonstration of Navalny’s photo recovery is the propaganda of attributes and a symbol of an extremist organization.” Leaving aside the grammatical clumsy of this formulation, we draw attention to its essence: the judge of the October Court of Murmansk Roman Girich, by his decision, declared an outside the law of man. Not any person, of course, but only one - Alexei Navalny. Until now, the world legal practice of such decisions seems to have not known.
The amazing verdict Judge Girich issued the administrative case of Marina-Victoria of the Nagorny, who allegedly placed the photo of Navalny in the thicket of trees at the residential building-and sent it for seven days to Kutuzka. He did this immediately upon the release of the Nagorny from the IVS, where she had already served the same period - for a poster with the name of the deceased politician. For the first time, the judge of the same court Elena Shilovskaya sent the girl under arrest. She decided that this was the “data leader of organizations”, which are recognized as extremist. That is, in fact, she also announced the name of the opposition "forbidden symbols."
In the decision of Girich, this thought is repeated: “Navalny’s surname is contained in the name of the“ headquarters of Navalny ”*, which is recognized by the extremist court and his activities are prohibited,” he writes. So:
The symbol that was not invented by someone, not an image from a poster or chevron, is not invented, but the personal personal data of a person to which the corresponding law classifies both the name and surname and the photo are declared extremist symbols!
This is what identifies two decisions of one court from the total mass of repressive cases against Supporters of Navalny. Moreover, it will not come out to write off the individual work of a particular person in the mantle-the judges are different. And they did not come up with this themselves: the decision relies on the testimony of specialists.
In itself, their presence in an administrative offense, and from the side of the prosecution, is significant. Remember if the protocol against an ordinary picketer was often sent to the court with the application of a bouquet of specialists? More often they come with a bouquet of grammatical errors.
These, however, are also in a court decision. What is worth, for example, the mysterious “coordinational center for the formation of an active civil position among youth”, an employee of which, part -time associate professor of the Department of Law of a Local University, assured that the photo of Navalny was an extremist symbol. The name of this specialist is exhausted, as well as the names of the other two: the professor who expressed the similar opinion of the professor is unknown what discipline and a member of the Society of Political Sciences (this exists in the same university where the previous “specialist” works), as well as an expert of the UFSB linguist.
To collect so many “police assistants” in one case, it was necessary to work hard. It is noteworthy that all these burdened by higher education, and some people did not come out of science with scientific degrees at all from science. Even to some extent, on the contrary. After all, the discovery that Navalny’s name can be prohibited at all, recognizing extremist, made a modest precinct Denis Moroz a few days before them. It was he who, in the protocol drawn up on the Nagorny, was the first to write: “He carried out a public demonstration of the poster with the inscription:“ Alexei Navalny was killed ”; The text contains the name and surname of the founder and leader of the organizations, which used the name and surname "Alexei Navalny" as paraphernalia and symbolism. " Further, it is indicated that these organizations are prohibited, which means that the Nagorny demonstrated extremist symbolism.
I don’t know if Major Frost will give some reward for the opening. It would be necessary to give. After all, it is it - if it enters the circulation - can allow you to clean all these, with flowers that are the day of the cemetery day. Declare the law of the deceased himself, name, surname, person. Watch out!
No, I'm wrong, this is not a know-how, it was already. When the names of the repressed were exhausted from the circulations of books, and excessly scrape out from group photos. Only procedurally, this seems to have not been issued.
By the way, attempts to attract for the photo were already the other day, a little earlier.
They tried to detain the girl in Barnaul because of the T-shirt with the image of the serial character Michael Scott-the police mixed him up with Navalny. Packed - released.
And if a man in a costume depicted on a T -shirt would have been a little more like a Russian politician, it turns out that they would also be sent under arrest?
It was more difficult to deal with the dead oppositionist than with the living. There are more people who come to honor his memory than we saw at rallies. This is clearly annoying the security forces. Will they be able to ban the whole person? Name, face, memory?
So far, Vika Nagorny has become experimental in this legal, but not legal experiment. She fell ill, already serving the first "day", an ambulance came to the court. But the girl was immediately sent again. The decision of Girich is especially noted (for this a linguist from the FSB was involved) that in the photo of Navalny, attached to a tree, there was an inscription "Immortal", which "expresses the recognition of the significance of the personality of Navalny." Here they want to destroy the personality posthumously.