
French President Emmanuel Macron in an interview with Le Figaro said Paris and London prepared a joint plan to stop the Russian-Ukrainian war. He performed a few hours after the European Security summit ended in London.
According to Macron, as part of the plan, the introduction of a partial truce for a period of one month is proposed. “Partiality” will be that the ceasefire will only apply to air and sea attacks, including attacks on energy facilities, but not to ground -based combat operations. According to Macron, compliance with the ceasefire on Earth "will be very difficult to check."
Macron also stated that at the second stage, within the framework of the European Country Plan, the peacekeeping contingent will be sent to Ukraine. He did not bring any details of this.
In an interview with Macron, he also stated that in the framework of European security strengthening, France would offer to place its nuclear weapons on the territory of the allies - to reduce European dependence on the United States. He did not call the country to which such an offer will be made.
Later, Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barro explained the meaning of a partial ceasefire: depending on its implementation, Ukraine and its allies will understand whether Vladimir Putin is in good faith and whether he is ready to start serious negotiations on a long-term peaceful agreement.
At the same time, the UK does not confirm Macron's words that the plan is already ready and agreed between Paris and London. British Deputy Minister of Defense Luke Pollard, in the comment of BBC, said that now "a whole set of options is being discussed." “None of them are agreed at this stage,” he emphasized.
U.S. President Donald Trump will discuss the possible abolition of military assistance to Ukraine on March 3, an anonymous American official told The New York Times.
According to the source of the publication, Trump will meet with the heads of the Pentagon and the State Department Pit Hegset and Marco Rubio.
The suspension of ammunition and equipment supplies that were allocated and paid under the Joe Biden administration will be discussed. We can talk either about the suspension, or about the complete cancellation of deliveries, writes NYT.
In the American press, on March 28, immediately after a quarrel between Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky, reports began to appear about the possible termination of American assistance to Ukraine. In particular, The Washington Post wrote about the presence of such plans. NYT sources then reported that the United States can completely stop even indirect support from Kyiv, for example, the exchange of intelligence and the training of the Ukrainian military.
The US share in the supply of weapons to Ukraine since the beginning of a full -scale war is about 50% - from 2022 to 2024 the EU and the UK provided Kyiv with 62 billion euros, and the United States - 64 billion.
According to European Pravda, an additional 20 billion euros per year, which would fully replace the American contribution, make up only 0.0001% of the EU GDP - but the main difficulty is not in money, but in the physical absence of weapons. Its reserves in the warehouses of the EU and the UK are coming to an end, and the pace of production is small, and in order to scale them, in any case it will take time. Bloomberg in his editorial article writes that this requires quick political decisions at the European level to increase the expenses of defense and closer cooperation between the European Union and Great Britain.
Egor (Belgorod). Since I live in the region with close proximity to the borders, the attitude to all this situation [over three years] has changed a lot. The main feeling from all this is fatigue. Everyone is madly tired. They say that the war reveals the worst in people, and here it is noticeably much stronger.
Initially, there was empathy and sympathy, and sincerely sorry that country and those people who turned out to be “enemies” only because they were born 40 kilometers west of you. And with these people you communicated perfectly at the university and never arose any debate or conflicts. But three years later, the situation changed, like all of us. Of the people who are sympathetic to the shelling in Kharkov, we ourselves turned into the same. Now Ukraine is no longer a victim for us. Given the support of Europe and the USA [Russia and Ukraine] almost two equal power.
We constantly hear the phrases: "Ukraine needs drones." But these drones fly into passing civilian cars, in kindergartens in Shebekino, which [we] know from the first lips, and not from the media. With the help of Vampire, shopping centers in Belgorod were fired (for example, the Belgorod department store, the City Mall shopping center). Civil, peaceful people die. This is far from military goals. Visiting the territory of the Kursk region and reprisals against civilians. The fight from beating differs only in whether the offender should be a response. Now this is no longer a beating, but a full -fledged fight, which should be stealing as soon as possible until the consequences have become much worse.
"Jellyfish"