
In Moscow, they are ready to discuss the proposal of the President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky on the extension of the ceasefire, the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov said.
Peskov emphasized that so far there are no “specific plans”, but there is confirmation of the readiness of President Vladimir Putin to discuss this issue “taking into account the analysis of the experience of Easter truce”. He left the answer to the direct question when Moscow answers Zelensky’s proposal, only saying that "this proposal needs to be discussed."
“That is, if we talk about objects of civil infrastructure, you need to clearly differentiate in what situations these objects can be a military purpose, and in which they cannot be. [...] He [Putin] said that if a meeting is held there, for example, militants, is this a civilian object? Civil. But is this a military goal? Military. Therefore, there are nuances that make sense to discuss, ”Peskov said.
The day before, Putin said that Russia needs time to evaluate the results of the "Easter truce." He admitted that Moscow could begin negotiations on the ceasefire at civilian facilities. Putin did not blame Ukraine of failing the “Easter truce”, noting that “in general, a decrease in the activity of the enemy was observed,” although he quoted the Russian Ministry of Defense on violations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Last night, Peskov confirmed that speaking of a potential discussion of the termination of attacks on civilian facilities, Putin meant precisely possible bilateral negotiations with Ukraine. As Reuters recalls, Moscow and Kyiv have not conducted direct negotiations since the spring of 2022.
Putin's statements about readiness for negotiations were made amid the threats of the United States to stop its intermediary mission if the parties do not show their commitment to the early end of fire in the very near future.
The plan of peaceful settlement, developed by the Donald Trump administration, involves the creation of special forces that will control the compliance with the ceasefire, the New York Post reports with reference to the source. There is no confirmation of this information.
According to the publication, a “joint commission” will be created for this, which will include Russians, Ukrainians and representatives of a third country that is not part of NATO. Members of this commission will observe what is happening on the front line.
The USA may also be involved in the work of the commission as “cash together with the third party,” the interlocutor of the publication said. He did not specify what is meant. At the same time, the presence of the Americans is not directly “on Earth”.
The New York Post also said that in the framework of the provision of guarantees to Ukraine, the possibility of deploying European troops on its territory is now being considered. He called the issue of guarantees of security to Kyiv "the most difficult."
The plan of the Trump administration last week was discussed in Paris with the participation of Ukraine and its European allies. The new meeting will take place in London on April 23, it is also expected that in the near future one of the senior advisers of the American president will go to Moscow to submit proposals to the Kremlin.
For some details of the plan for several days, citing sources, various large American media wrote. According to them, the United States is ready to recognize Crimea by Russian territory and offer to remove sanctions from the Russian Federation in the event of a long truce. The occupied territories of four more regions of Ukraine will remain de facto under Russian control.
Officially, public faces neither in the USA nor any other details of the plan were commented. Trump himself the day before said that he would tell the details of the agreement over the next three days. He also expressed confidence that the transaction could be concluded this week.
M. (Moscow). From February 24, 2022, I fell into a state of rage and, it seems, only on it and still hold on to this day. I went to the first rallies. Friends from Ukraine stopped talking to me - I respect their decision. First, weapons should shut up, then you can talk.
Since I have no desire or the opportunity to leave Russia, I simply observe the emerging eyes of the layman, who, like everyone, shut their mouths. For three years I notice a change in the views of my neighbors, parents, in lines and so on. [Instead of] the patriotic fucker and slogans from the TV began to sound that it was time to stop the war, and in general all this is nonsense and sur. True, how to do this, no one has thoughts. Some acquaintances of acquaintances go to the war to "earn extra", but if a person has chosen the murder of other people as a part -time - I do not want anything good. I still meet people who are surprised once every three or four soared prices for everything. Yes, really, what happened? After the end of the wars, it would be nice to introduce a lesson in logic and building causal relationships on the entire planet. The city of my childhood is in complete devastation, and what, is NATO is also to blame? America personally bombed our roads?
I am perplexed in half with contempt for those who left, who walk a white coat in Europe and know how it is better for us to live here. It would seem that the Internet should unite us, but in fact the information bubbles were impenetrable.
The worst thing now is to continue your work. Suddenly she became dangerous. I never thought that I would find myself in one of those books that we took place at school in high school (Solzhenitsyn, Ginzburg) and discussed: it is nonsense and good that it doesn’t happen. The worst thing is that Russia has opened some endless hole in Hell, and now the whole world looks at the maniac with an ax in his hand and every “strong leader” sees that he can also be so. And there will be nothing for anyone. The whole world is immersed in some new centers, and you can objectively do nothing with this. I'm just waiting for it to end [...].
"Jellyfish"