And we will hit you with a square meter

The struggle of President Donald Trump with the prosecutor Leticia James reached a new level. Both sides were good. More precisely, bad

One of the most munitive affairs against Donald Trump by the prosecutors of the Democratic Party was started by James, who was chosen in 2018 by the Prosecutor General of the state of New York. During the election campaign, James repeatedly gave the voters a word that in the event of her victory, she would deal with Trump.

What to blame him for, she had no idea at that moment, but the prosecutor’s business is simple: there would be a man, but there would be a matter. And after Trump expressed a desire to exhibit for a second term, James aroused a lawsuit against him for deceiving banks that led him money. The deception, according to the prosecutor’s office, was that the defendant's corporation Trump Organizatiom systematically overstated the value of his real estate in order to receive loans at a preferential percentage.

Few saw this case with a good judicial perspective. The defense said that almost all real estate sellers first ask for more for her than she stands. Trump's lawyers even accused the prosecutor’s office of underestimating the market value of Trump real estate and, for example, estimated his estate Mar-A-hala in the unfortunate $ 18 million, although any Florida homeless will tell you that it is much more expensive.

Trump's lawyers said that in any case, banks did not believe the sellers for a word, but rely on professional appraisers, and noted that, submitting documents to the bank, the Trump company itself recommended not to rely on its grades, but to order its own.

Representatives of banks also did not complain about Trump, but, on the contrary, extolled him in their testimony, said, they said

That he gave the money on time and with the promised interest, and expressed his readiness to lend him further. Trump’s defense has repeatedly noted that not a single bank lost a cent, and everyone earned.

The prosecutor’s office retorted that the defendant deliberately overestimated the value of his real estate, that is, violated the law, and “no one is higher than the law,” said Prosecutor General James. She repeated this formula repeatedly, sometimes expanding it to "no matter how steep, rich or powerful you have imagined yourself, no one is no higher than the law."

Now Trump’s camp repeats this phrase with rapture.

Even before the process, Judge Arthur Engor concluded that Trump was guilty of fraud of banks, and the debate of the parties concerned only the size of the punishment. Since the matter was civilian, James was powerless to wrap Trump into prison, but could tear off a large amount from him. However, few assumed that Manhattan judge Arthur Engon will oblige Trump to pay hundreds of millions of dollars.

Critics called this amount of unprecedented and "grotesque."

When the defense was scored, James threatened that she would begin to sell Trump's real estate from the hammer, and the judge ordered Trump to be deposited before the decision of the court of appeal in unheard of 455 million. Meanwhile, the interest on punishment continues to grow, and recently Trump has already exceeded the debt for half a billion. He is still waiting for a decision of the appeal, which pulls the rubber unusually long even by the turtle standards of American jurisprudence.

Judging by the replicas of the appeal judges in the debate of the parties, they may well make a decision in favor of Trump and if the verdict of Engoron is not canceled, they will almost certainly reduce the punishment he appointed.

In November, Trump again knocked into the president, which sharply expanded his opportunity to settle scores with his offenders. He is not one of those who neglected such opportunities, and the other day the director of the Federal Department of Financing Housing Fund sent a letter of recommendation to the Ministry of Justice to initiate a criminal case against ... the Prosecutor General of the state of New York Leticia James, which allegedly violated the law on the provision of mortgage loans.

As stated in a recommendation letter, asking for a loan for the purchase of real estate in Virginia, James falsely indicated that this building would be her permanent residence. This allowed her to take a loan under a preferential percentage.

The Prosecutor General also allegedly reduced in the documents the size of her house in Brooklyn: it had five apartments, and she allegedly claimed that there were four, and therefore had the right to claim financial benefits in New York.

Not only did she allegedly bother almost the same way, according to her, Mukhovna Trump: the New York Law obliges the general prosecutor to live in the state of New York, and James told the bank that she would be registered in Virginia, where, according to the neighbors, she almost does not happen.

Secondly, as stated in a recommendatory letter, James indicated in the documents that she and her father are a married couple. In recent years, America has known many varieties of innovative marriages, but I still met such a combination only once: the progressive member of the House of Representatives Ilkhan Omar, supposedly went out for her brother, who needed Grinkart.

No one has yet seen the indictment in the case of Prosecutor General James, which has not yet been attracted for anything, and it is unclear whether they will attract, and if they are attracted, then for what exactly.

Her critics encourage each other with reminders that in December, for similar fraud with mortgage loans, the Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby was sentenced to year of house arrest and three years of vowel, that is, such cases have a judicial prospect.

But Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at the metropolitan University of George Washington, noticed last week that New York is a kind of city whose courts may be more favorable to James than Trump.