Immoral insanity

Some important gentlemen and ladies suffer from an incurable secret disease

18+ This material (information) was produced, distributed and (or) sent by foreign agent Minkin Alexander Viktorovich or concerns the activities of foreign agent Minkin Alexander Viktorovich.

Minister of Justice (Justice - Lat.) Chuychenko and Deputy Minister of Justice of Sviridenko sang in chorus to foreign agents, very popular in our atmosphere of the venue ...

The named lawyers performed at the legal (yes) forum in St. Petersburg.

Doctor of Law, Actual State Councilor of the Russian Federation of the 1st grade (corresponds to the military rank of Army General Sviridenko, announced the tightening of the participation of foreign agents.

Sviridenko. Minor fines do not contribute to the observance of the law by persons recognized by foreign agents, and by the foreign agents, until recently, triumphs in the fact of their inclusion in the register. The Ministry of Justice will offer initiatives, I think that the deputy corps will support us, because the criminal liability needs to be introduced. This is a new concept. Enough to nurse these subjects who do not bring anything good to our country.

Of course: for Mr. Sviridenko, fines of 30 and 50 thousand, which are pulled from foreign agents, of course, are insignificant. But for me, a pensioner, they are extremely heavy.

We (and those who are already foreign agents, and those who else will be appointed, and me personally) threats Sviridenko directly concern. It seems to him that he is nursing with me, and I am sure that he is taking personal accounts with me. For after my article in the newspaper he was a decision of the qualification collegium of judges, he was dismissed from the post of deputy chairman of the Supreme Court of Russia. But he did not drown (as an experienced nomenclature person), but became the deputy minister of justice. In this new position, he signed an “order” about entering me in the register of foreign agents, which sharply complicated my life. And now this author of a certain dissertation (which caused doubts in the scientific environment) decided to make me a criminal. Well, damn it. God will not give out - the pig will not eat.

And about the one who does not bring anything good to our country, then it would be nice to argue with Sviridenko publicly, with documents in his hands. And not only about what I brought good, but also about how much and what I brought (or deduced from circulation).

***

Konstantin Chuychenko is a rare case. He is both the actual state adviser to the Russian Federation of the 1st grade, and the actual state adviser to the justice of the Russian Federation - that is, immediately both the Army General and just a colonel. Here is what the Minister of Justice said (justice - lat.), The half -head in a chair on the stage of a fair legal forum in the cultural capital of the Russian Federation.

Chuychenko. Unfortunately, the monarchy ( Russian. - A. M.) was very liberal and, I would say, even excessively noble. If we see how the Decembrists were punished for their rebellion ... On the one hand, it causes great respect for the autocrat, on the other hand, it probably illustrates a certain, and maybe significant weakness of his and political regime.

The “significantly weak” regime (the Romanov monarchy) lasted 300 years (after the Decembrists uprising is almost a hundred). But on the issues of arithmetic with Chuychenko we will not argue.

The significantly more cruel Soviet (mainly Stalin) regime lasted almost 70. The difference is significant.

A huge difference is even brighter among the repressed and in the objects of repression. The monarchy sent to hard labor and occasionally executed specific criminals. Council destroyed the estates and the “group” hundreds of thousands: kulaks, priests, nobles ...

To destroy scientists, to blame philologists and biologists, geneticists and cybernetics of wrecking is a real madness. The result and consequences of the Soviet regime are visible to everyone: phones, computers, cars, televisions, clothes, shoes, medical instruments and devices (MRI, etc.), beets, bull sperm, condoms, pencils, toothpaste, football - all the imported. Why?

The half sweat regime (much more cruel than Stalin) lasted only 4 years. So, contrary to the strange ideas of the Minister of Justice, the cruelty of the regime does not ensure its duration and vitality.

Chuychenko called the Nikolaev monarchy “very liberal” - they say, they hung only five. But it was, no matter how strange, illegal decision seemed.

The trial of the Decembrists had a unique official name:

Supreme Criminal Court of attackers,

Established by the highest manifesto,

June of June 1826

The preamble says:

“The court recognized and unanimously determined that the crimes, in acts indicated for the own confessions of the defendants, two times certified, are subject to all without removal of the death penalty.

Sim with one common sentence ended in all its legitimate accuracy.

Everyone who acted and agreed, and even participated, and even those who knew, but did not convey about the intent of an attempt on the sacred person of the emperor, or any of the imperial surname, also about the intent of the rebellion and military rebellion, all without removal are subject to the death penalty, and by the exact force of laws, they are considered to be this execution to this execution. awarded.

Thus (according to the law), all 121 criminal should have been executed. But the emperor ordered the distribution of “categories of punishment” in accordance with the personal and proven guilt of everyone. And 10 categories appeared in the verdict.

“Non -discharge. All criminals, who, in the special property and importance of their atrocities, cannot become part of the categories, put the death penalty in a quarter.

First. To all criminals, to the first category belonging to, put the death penalty by cutting off their heads.

Second. To all criminals, to the second category belonging, to determine the so -called political death in our laws, that is, put their heads on the block, and then send forever in hard labor ... "

Thus, five were sentenced to quarter, 31 - to the cut of the head ...

It should be explained: quartering is a painful execution.

QUARTERING. In Russia, it was carried out in the following way: the convict was chopped off with an ax, arms and then a head.

Encyclopedic dictionary.

Thus, not four pieces came out of the person (which would correspond to the term), but six.

But the monarch (after the sentence) replaced five with a painful execution with a light (hanging), and the ax ordered not to be used at all, so they did not cut off his head. Well, the hard labor was reduced to everyone.

Try to decide for yourself: this is atrocities or weakness, or just some humanity. Only at the same time, think not about the two hundred years ago Pestelier and Ryleyev, but about how you reacted to this if the case concerned your brother, husband or father. Would you reproach the ruler for excessive weakness?

It is quite obvious that Sviridenko and Chuychenko, looking into the history of Russia, see themselves by judges, rulers of fate, and they simply cannot imagine themselves on a gallows or hard labor. And therefore, all humanity in the ruler would be considered weak if it suddenly manifested itself (which God had been merciful so far).

***

For the completeness of the picture, for, so to speak, an increase in contrast in photographs of historical moments of 1825 and 2025, we quote the most important historical document giving an idea of ​​the principles of the highest power, which the Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation called "very liberal and even excessively noble." (This, by the way, is a very frank recognition of the minister. He believes that there is unnecessary nobility. In those areas where ministers/deputy ministers of this kind of excess function are unacceptable.)

The historical document begins solemnly:

God's mercy we are Nikolai the first,

Emperor and autocrat of the All -Russian,

and other, and other, and other

This 5-page rescript ends like this:

“We do not have, we cannot have other desires on how to see our Fatherland at the highest degree of happiness and glory, by providing it predetermined.

Finally, among these general hopes and desires, we include special attention to the situation of families, from which their related members disappeared by the crime. In all the continuation of this matter, compassion is sincerely regrettable their feelings, we are imputing ourselves with a duty, to certify them that in the eyes of our kinship the fame of deeds, the ancestors are embarrassed, but does not overshadow dishonesty for personal vices or crimes. Yes, no one dares to put them in kinship to someone in reproach: Civil law prohibits this, and Christian law is more.

In Tsarskoye Selo, July 13, 1826.

On the genuine, he was signed by his own imperial majesty, with his hand: Nikolai. "

It's clear? “Yes, no one dares to introduce crimes on kinship to someone in reproach.” This is a categorical ban not only to pursue relatives, but even to rebuke them.

We will not remember the native Stalinist abbreviations of Chsir (member of the family of the traitor of the Motherland), Algeria (Akmola camp of the wives of the traitors of the Motherland), etc. Why remember when you can look around him to understand ...

Is this Minister of Justice, this deputy - they at least once stood up for the persecuted relatives of political criminals? Suppose that famous people are condemned rightly, for example, their fault has been proven. But why are their old people who are persecuted? ..

This minister, this deputy - are they tirelessly baking about justice? About the prosperity of teachers, doctors, pilots, engineers, orderlies? -I do not see a single feature that would allow you to think about these state advisers-Generals. Maybe someone sees such signs, but I do not see such signs-ghosts; In general, I do not believe in ghosts.

***

You can often hear that our society is painful. And what?

In all pre -revolutionary encyclopedias there is an article “moral insanity”.

“Moral insanity is a mental illness in which moral representations lose their strength and cease to be a motive for behavior. With moral insanity, a person becomes indifferent to good and evil, without losing, however, the abilities of theoretical, formal between them of distinction. It is incurable. "

Encyclopedic dictionary F. Pavlenkov. S.-PB, 1905.

In the beautiful but brief dictionary of Pavlenkov, “moral insanity” occupies a dozen lines. In the famous Encyclopedia of Brockhaus and Efron (41st Plaim, 1897), this disease occupies a complete reversal of a large format; You read with horror, involuntarily applying the description of the XIX century by the XXI.

After the 1917 revolution, this article from encyclopedias disappeared. Cured of the incurable? Or, conversely, the disease took possession of the majority, and the majority does not like to be considered sick and poked such diagnoses in his nose.

What you do not call - that seems to be not. You do not call a person - it means that he is not. You do not call a certain phenomenon or illness - it means that they are not, everyone is healthy.

The Soviet government ended almost 40 years ago, but an unpleasant disease did not return to dictionaries.

* The authorities of the Russian Federation introduced in the register of "foreign agents."