Translated material
"Grandfather died, but the case lives ..."
The queues for the Mausoleum closing for the reconstruction make it possible to assume that Stalin may also appear there soon
18+. This material (information) was produced, distributed and (or) sent by foreign agent Vishnevsky Boris Lazarevich or concerns the activities of the foreign agent Vishnevsky Boris Lazarevich.
The Lenin Mausoleum on Red Square by the decision of the Ministry of Culture is closed by a two -year restoration - until the spring of 2027.
The agency says that “Work on waterproofing and injection of walls, the device of carpentry and engineering networks, as well as strengthening the enclosing structures of stair gatherings” is planned, while the main hall - where Lenin’s body lies - the restoration will not affect.
In anticipation of a temporary parting in the mausoleum, a huge line was lined up, not from foreigners, as usual, but from Russians. Some of them are lamented: what if Ilyich will not return to place after restoration? And how to live?
... ”Grandfather died, but the case lives - it would be better to the contrary,” this verse was very popular during the years of perestroika, when previously forbidden topics began to be discussed, including Lenin’s biography, the theory and practice of his “all -conquering” teaching were subjected to a critical assessment.
And it turns out that the whole life of the “grandfathers of Lenin”, about which my and other generations was told in childhood and youth and which countless books, dissertations, articles, films and performances are devoted to a careful examination to a collection of myths.
Lenin will create one of these myths to himself, others will order Stalin on the tablets, who will need to imagine himself the heir to the great leader and teacher, the others will invent the court historians of the Khrushchev and Brezhnev eras, canonize the image of the “human person”.
However, the theoretician, who “enriched” Marxism and fieryly fighting with the “opportunists” and “revisionists”, will turn out to be either a clever compiler or an audionist: many of his innovations are fundamentally diverge from Marx's ideas.
“The great philosopher and natural scientist”, the author of “Materialism and empiriocriticism” and the creator of “Leninist theory of reflection”, will turn out to be a profane that teachs professionals “from the point of view of Marxist teaching”: what, for example, is its denial of the possibility of mutual transformation of elements?
The Proletarian Leader, who was patiently preparing the revolution, is absent in Russia from 1900 to 1917 (except for several weeks in 1905), living in prosperous emigration and periodically asking the mother’s money. Lenin learns from the Swiss newspapers about the February Revolution of 1917: in the letter of Inessa Armand, he himself will write: “Today in Zurich we learned that a revolution in St. Petersburg won in Russia on March 14.”
The “organizer of the October uprising” from October 20, 1917 to the evening of the 24th, he mysteriously disappears, appearing in Smolny when the transition of power to the hands of the Petrosovet already became a failed fact.
The famous meeting of the Central Committee on October 21, 1917, where the leader pronounces "yesterday it was early, and the day after tomorrow, is late," the legend composed by John Rid.
Finally, countless films and ceremonial paintings depicting Ilyich with a beard and a mustache during the October uprising, ignore the fact (remaining in the memoirs of contemporaries) that Lenin was shaved then ...
But the essence of the matter is not only in the myths that accompany many famous politicians (although not all of them have been reproduced in textbooks for decades and become the dogmas of the “civil religion” - with their prophets, canons, ceremonies, sacred books, clergy, heretics and inquisition). The essence of the matter is that the person whose mummy is stored in the mausoleum has laid the foundations of monstrous teaching, according to which everything that serves the ultimate goal is permissible; It is possible and should violate the everyday principles of morality in order to achieve this goal, you can “go to all sorts of tricks, tricks, illegal techniques, silence, concealment of truth” (direct quote from his work of “childhood disease in the communism”).
Whoever is not with us is against us, if the enemy does not give up - he is destroyed, the end justifies the means - these are the basic principles of this teaching.
Then, in the era of the “thaw”, the thesis about the alleged distortion of Stalin of genuine Lenin teachings will become popular, which led to the cult of personality and repression, and the need to return to the “Leninist norms of party life”.
That's just “genuine teaching” and “Leninist norms” are as monstrous as the Stalin's, there were no essential “deviations”, but there was a direct continuation.
The practical application of the Lenin teachings in one individual country began with terror - to which the “most human person” was urgently called, sending out the dispatches with the demands to shoot, shoot and shoot enemies without any mercy.
It was according to his instructions that the courts were replaced by “revolutionary tribunals”, which made decisions for class reasons on the basis of “revolutionary legal awareness” and “proletarian conscience”.
His instructions created a punitive machine of the Cheka, combining the prosecutor’s office, investigation, court and making sentences to execute, the victim of which every “class enemy” or his “accomplice” could become the victim.
He, a lawyer on formal education, despised laws, saying that if the law interferes with the “development of the revolution”, it must be canceled.
He at the All -Russian Congress of Soviets in 1918 stated that “a revolutionary who does not want to hypocrite cannot refuse the death penalty” ...
Are there thinking about this in line to the mausoleum and sad (as they retell the media) that “we say goodbye to the era” and that “I'm afraid, we can not meet Ilich anymore”?
Or in their heads only “grandfather Lenin”, composing their historical works (as depicted in a popular picture), sitting in a suit with a tie on a hemp near a hut in a spill?
Would they like to move to the Lenin era with the help of a time machine and live according to the “Leninist norms” indicated? To get by the wave of the finger of your idol among the "class enemies"? That is, at any time to be subjected to “expropriation” at best, and at worst - to go under the execution by the decision of the Revil Bill?
No? Why, actually? The causal relationship does not work?
Just like the yearning for Stalin, a logical chain does not work, which allows us to assume that it would be with them personally in the Stalin era.
However, if things in the country continue to go as now, then, as it were, the Stalinist mummy, taken out of there in 1961, was not returned to the mausoleum.
But even without this, Yevtushenko is constantly recalled:
*As long as the heirs of Stalin are on earth,
It will seem to me that Stalin is still in the mausoleum.*