In the spring of 2010, the court sided with the clown of Yuri Kuklachev, whom the mathematician Mikhail Verbitsky accused of his blog of abuse of cats: Verbitsky was asked to remove publications.
- Why do you think the court counted the position. - In the fact that in the comments to the records you can not swear obscenities. They do not like in our organs when they are publicly swearing, a well -known fact.
- Why did Kulachev decide to go to court?
- Because he is engaged in systematic purification of the Internet from unpleasant information. 34 The claim was called this figure by Kuklachev himself.
Will you defend your position further?
- The zoo defenders, in fact, are already doing this. Each performance of Kuklachev abroad is blocked by dozens of demonstrators accusing him of tormenting animals.
- How will this story end - your forecast?
- I think that the circuses with the people will gradually die, they are already banned in half of European countries. As for Kulachev, in Israel, he beaten two-demonstration girls (from one a video camera), in Germany it was brought up on zoomochision, it must be assumed that his circus will close much earlier.
A precedent with Kuklachev is an isolated case or an already established practice of making court decisions in Russia?
- Yes, this is the current practice. Judicial decisions are always made in favor of a person close to the authorities.
- You called the case with Kuklachev "an attempt to establish censorship on the Internet." Can you explain what you meant?
- Because Kuklachev systematically removed all the materials from the network where he was exposed as an animal tormentor. This is censorship.
- Why are your views on culture and common accepting so often on hostility?
- This is mutual. I also do not like society, society and culture.
Why?
This is called "critical thinking."
- You are called a specialist in the Western counterculture, a network publicist, blogger, writer. And what would you call yourself?
- Without swearing, it is difficult.
- What are the most powerful political entities in Russia, not counting the party bureaucracy?
- DPNI, however, and other National Mracobes. This is an obvious consequence of the fact that society is immersed in ignorance and wildness. I think that if everything continues in the same spirit, workers and cannibals will replace the DPNI.
- Is it possible to society without a system called "state"?
- The state is a machine of violence, one of the hundreds, and in essence does not differ from any other (church, school, corporations), so the right question is whether a society is possible that there is a possible violence. influence. . I am quite sure, there are a lot of literature on how public relations in society without material lack will be arranged. Obviously, there will be neither money (in the usual sense for us), nor work (I am talking about the obligation). It seems to me that society without coercion ((in T, including economic) is close to ideal - each resident should provide its material needs, and let him do what he wants.