In the Kremlin The results of the week. Time to evaluate the ferrets September 10, 2010 Alexander Golts Once again, miserable renegos and insinuators, who in powerless malice, claimed that there were no elections in Russians, were shameful. Before our eyes, such an election campaign unfolds in the country that no Pindos dreamed.

On the day of the explosion in Vladikavkaz, Russian President Medvedev, in a boring voice, uttered the usual Kremlin mantra - “punish the murderers in accordance with the law,” and then, in a sudden surge of frankness, clarified: “In case of resistance - or in other cases - destroy.” What other cases , Dmitry Anatolyevich? Isn’t it the same one on the occasion of which the special services shot terrorists in “Nord-Ost”? So that no one, God forbid, begins to testify?

The Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration, the author of the term “sovereign democracy” took part in the Yaroslavl “world” political forum.

In uniform Sutyan distorts the facts September 10, 2010 Andrey Soldatov, Irina Borogan Igor Sutyan, in his answer to the article by Yulia Latinina, refers to our 2004 investigation, as Julia Latynina did before. Thus, a rather strange situation has developed when a discussion of what we did and investigated is underway without our participation. Igor Sutyan directly distorted the facts regarding the material under discussion, the authors of which we are.

After the meeting of the Public Chamber, where the textbook by Alexander Barsenkov and Alexander Vdovin was discussed, it seemed to me, a naive observer, for a moment that “the incident was ruined”: all participants in the discussion admitted that the manual contained unverified data, the authors operated with dubious hypotheses, used unscientific versions. Verdict - such manuals cannot be recommended for training; they must either be radically reworked or reclassified as a monograph.

“But if you want to bring / People to bitter tears, / It’s safest to tease them / On the radio,” wrote Grigory Oster. The Kremlin prefers to tease people on TV. Luzhkov was greatly offended because he openly took the side of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in the conflict over the Khimki forest, approved the idea of ​​​​building a highway through the forest, and equated President Dmitry Medvedev, although without naming his name, with talkers who do nothing.

In the Kremlin Blood on the hands September 10, 2010 Anton Oresh “This person has blood in his arms,” Putin said about Khodorkovsky, when at the meeting in the so -called “Valdai” shice, they once again asked about the fate of the MBH. And even the divine person changed in the person, according to Adam Mikhnik and some other participants in the discussion.